Weird artifact in CLSCCD images that won't calibrate away

8 replies136 views
Vin avatar

Hello,

I’m attaching two quick images taken on the same night (two different objects, saved as JPGs for size) - one HA, one CLSCCD filter (OSC camera). Flats taken with a panel that same night. If you look in the CLSCCD image, about a third of the way down the diagonal line that connects the top left and bottom right corners, you’ll see a dust bunny. That’s not there in the HA image.

Has anyone experienced s/t like this, or know what may be going on?

The only thing I can think of is that it is something on the CLSCCD filter (although that has been closed in a filter wheel for months). If it was on the objective or the sensor, it would show up on both. (I actually took images on two nights, cleaning the objective after their first night, and taking flats again on the second night and the same thing happens).

So it can only be on the CLSCCD filter right? I haven’t opened it up yet, but before I did that I thought I’d check to see if anyone else has ever experienced s/t like this? (SHouldn’t the flat calibration still remove it even if its just s/t on the CLSCCD filter? The FW and objective haven’t been opened for months, and this has never happened before).

Many thanks for any insights!

Vin

CLSCCD:📷 lbn_538_for Abin post.jpglbn_538_for Abin post.jpg

HA:

📷 LDN_909_for Abin post.jpgLDN_909_for Abin post.jpg

Helpful Engaging
Mikołaj Wadowski avatar

Some dust must’ve shifted on the CLSCCD filter, either mid-session or after session before flats. It might be possible to use old flats to get rid of it.

Vin avatar

Mikołaj Wadowski · Sep 24, 2025 at 02:10 PM

Some dust must’ve shifted on the CLSCCD filter, either mid-session or after session before flats. It might be possible to use old flats to get rid of it.

Thanks Mikolaj. I tried that with a couple of older flats and sadly no joy. I’ll have to hope that GIMP can come to the rescue, and also perhaps open up the FW to take a look at what’s going on w that filter.

Cheers

andrea tasselli avatar
I'm sure Graxpert would improve things quite a bit, then just a bit of cloning…
Vin avatar

andrea tasselli · Sep 24, 2025 at 11:37 PM

I'm sure Graxpert would improve things quite a bit, then just a bit of cloning…

Thanks Andrea - tried that and it stays as stark as before. I think it will indeed come down to cloning in Gimp to erase that bunny - frustrating (feels a bit like cheating!).

Bob Lockwood avatar
If you have Photoshop you could do a SXT, then use the clone stamp to replace the background.  Not sure if Gimp dose this, don't have it.

andrea tasselli avatar
andrea tasselli · Sep 24, 2025 at 11:37 PM

I'm sure Graxpert would improve things quite a bit, then just a bit of cloning…

Thanks Andrea - tried that and it stays as stark as before. I think it will indeed come down to cloning in Gimp to erase that bunny - frustrating (feels a bit like cheating!).

Oh, well... As for cloning, if you have another image of the same field you could used THAT as the source of the clone and you can do that in PI, too.
Vin avatar

Thanks both. Andrea sadly I don’t have another image. But Bob your idea of using clone stamp on the starless image is ingenious - I will try that. (It would never have struck me! In the past when I’ve used GIMP’s clone stamp, I’ve always done it on the final image and so had to tread very gingerly around stars…oops)

Well written Respectful
Scott Badger avatar

Leela.Astro.Imaging · Sep 26, 2025, 09:14 AM

Thanks both. Andrea sadly I don’t have another image. But Bob your idea of using clone stamp on the starless image is ingenious - I will try that. (It would never have struck me! In the past when I’ve used GIMP’s clone stamp, I’ve always done it on the final image and so had to tread very gingerly around stars…oops)

You can use the same technique to repair minor stacking issues; remove the stars, clone over the edge artifacts, and replace the stars. Saves you from cropping an entire image due to stacking artifacts in a single channel.

Cheers,

Scott

Well written Concise
Related discussions
Error in pixlnsight
This is happening to me in Pix. Is anyone else experiencing this, or has anyone else experienced it before? I've been searching for what it could be, but I can't find anything. 📷 Captura de pantalla 2025-12-01 a las 18.02.24.png
Troubleshooting image artifacts in PixInsight processing workflow.
Dec 1, 2025
Help - Vertical bands - Flats is the culprit - Can someone help me understand what's happening ?
Hi, Recently I am noticing some weird band like structures in my images. My setup - QHY600PH-M + Takahashi Epsilon 180ED + Astronomik Filters. I Captured RGB images in QHY 2CMS-1 Readout mode at 56 gain for broadband images. (mistake) After noticing ...
Investigating dust and defects visible in specific filter images.
Nov 23, 2025
PixInsight WBPP - dust motes/donut still not cleaned with flats
Hello, I am still seeing dust motes/donut shaped spots even after calibrating with flats. I tried few exposures with flats but no improvement. I use dark, bias and flat calibration frames and default wbpp settings. from the attached screenshot, you c...
Artifact in calibrated images that won't calibrate away
Sep 30, 2025
Problems generating my flats
Hi! Does anyone know why my flats shots have two circles in the center of the image? My equipment is a WO RedCat v3, and in the optical train I have a ZWO filter drawer, a filter wheel, and my ASI 294mm Pro camera. I have the filter drawer because I ...
Flat frame issues causing artifacts in astronomical images.
Aug 5, 2025
Problem with Narrowband Normalisation in 1.9.2
I'm having an issue where Narrowband Normalisation is giving me just a cyan image. See screenshot attached showing the image, the preview and the processing history. This is OSC data with a DNB filter (533MC Pro & L-enhance) in Pixinsight 1.9...
OSC camera filter artifact; similar OSC data processing issue in PixInsight.
Feb 7, 2025