Heart Nebula feedback needed

11 replies382 views
Rob Calfee avatar
Hi!

Requesting constructive critique for this one, the Heart Nebula: https://www.astrobin.com/5l2nju/B/

This is the first real multiple-night project that I coordinated for best SNR during acquisition and my first real attempt at deconvolution with so many subs behind it. 

Feedback welcome as I want to up my game a bit. I realize much of this is personal taste, though. 

Thanks,
Rob
Well written Respectful Engaging
rhedden avatar
Here's my constructive criticism.  The first thing that jumps out at me is that the image appears to be monochrome red with mostly white stars, which is usually not the most appealing palette.  You may want to look through the archives on Astrobin at Heart Nebula photos, sort them by Likes, and look at some of the IOTD and Top Picks winners of the past.  You can get an idea of what filter combinations people have used to produce more colorful images that gained some recognition from the community.

The stars in the corners of your image have some distortions with your setup.  You have some issues with optics, or with back-focus or tilt adjustments.  Most of us have some of these issues, but you want to work hard on eliminating them to the best of your ability.

There are some deconvolution artifacts , particularly along the lower border of your image.

Hope these suggestions are helpful!
Well written Helpful Insightful Respectful
Rob Calfee avatar
Here's my constructive criticism.  The first thing that jumps out at me is that the image appears to be monochrome red with mostly white stars, which is usually not the most appealing palette.  You may want to look through the archives on Astrobin at Heart Nebula photos, sort them by Likes, and look at some of the IOTD and Top Picks winners of the past.  You can get an idea of what filter combinations people have used to produce more colorful images that gained some recognition from the community.

The stars in the corners of your image have some distortions with your setup.  You have some issues with optics, or with back-focus or tilt adjustments.  Most of us have some of these issues, but you want to work hard on eliminating them to the best of your ability.

There are some deconvolution artifacts , particularly along the lower border of your image.

Hope these suggestions are helpful!

Thanks!
andrea tasselli avatar
I'd agree with the fomer poster: it is essentially a monochrome image. Don't know if because of the choice filter or something else. You might want to revisit the whole process as IC1804 is both an emission and reflection nebula (which seems to be cut off when you use narrowband imaging). Also, I'd not use deconvolution at you image scale/aperture. There are other ways to improve contrast.
Concise
Rob Calfee avatar
When do you use deconvolution? What scale/aperture. Thanks for the feedback.
Rob Calfee avatar
This critique is exactly what I needed. I'll tell ya, I never noticed the monochrome aspect, on mine or anyone else's. But now I can pick that out. So many times y'all point something out that I would've never noticed on my own. Makes me graphical design-challenged from fear. Thanks!
andrea tasselli avatar
Rob Calfee:
When do you use deconvolution? What scale/aperture. Thanks for the feedback.

I wouldn't do unless you are sampling the airy disk/seeing which at your image scale just isn't going to happen. But that doesn't stop most people from using it. Still, I find that this gives the image a very artificial look but YMMV. I guess you can forget about stars colours with L-extreme filter but you should be able to produce a false colour rendering if the OIII signal is significant enough.
Ian McIntyre avatar
To be honest I likes the first version. Some might feel that the redder red is less desirable, but to my eyes it maintains more detail in the nebula itself. Plus that version has considerably more color variation in the stars. This is just one novices opinion: in a standard pallette, I don't see a whole lot of images of the Heart that I would consider that much better. I'm not one to dig around in the corners of the photo that much either.

I recently attempted my first multiple night session. My target was a wide field of the Elephant Trunk nebula. I went ahead and produced a version of the first night by itself. It wasn't great, but it was view worthy. When I tried to incorporate the second night the colors got all fouled up. Not sure what the issue was. Point is, I can attest to the challenges of integrating multiple nights.
Helpful Respectful Engaging Supportive
andrea tasselli avatar
Ian McIntyre:
I recently attempted my first multiple night session. My target was a wide field of the Elephant Trunk nebula. I went ahead and produced a version of the first night by itself. It wasn't great, but it was view worthy. When I tried to incorporate the second night the colors got all fouled up. Not sure what the issue was. Point is, I can attest to the challenges of integrating multiple nights

Not sure what the issue you guys have with multiple nights. I used to do multiple night across several years and not to flinch an eyelid. So I'll be courious to understand what these issue might be. Is it a software issue or is it related to the data?
Björn Arnold avatar
andrea tasselli:
Not sure what the issue you guys have with multiple nights. I used to do multiple night across several years and not to flinch an eyelid. So I'll be courious to understand what these issue might be. Is it a software issue or is it related to the data?


If I may just ask a detail about multiple night sessions: does it mean you do one filter per night (e.g. Ha today, OIII tomorrow) or each night some data for each filter?

EDIT: for NB targets, I‘ve been doing the first approach and haven’t noticed significant issues which I would attribute to different night.
Engaging
Steven avatar
I don't see the "monochrome" as a huge issue. It's the heart nebula… it's pretty darn red, that's just the way it is.
Yes, the star colour could be better to make the image pop, and the middle of the heart nebula could be more white/blue-ish. But it is a great image already.

I haven't seen the raw data, there might be more that you can pull out in the processing by using different settings, or focussing on different parts/layers of the image individually to pull out some more colours. 

But, it is for a very large part because of the filter. 
The "optolong l-extreme". It is a great filter for sure, but it has very tight passes in Ha and Oiii. So, usually it does lack a bit of colour if something isn't either red or blue. 

One thing I've been trying to experiment with is adding some more filter data then just my L-Extreme.
I use an "Optolong L-Pro" to take like 10-20 frames of 30 seconds each or so, to create a layer from the L-Pro that I will use for the stars. instead of white, the stars are then the yellows and blues that they are supposed to be and I layer those into on top of the L-Extreme.
Helpful Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
I don't see the "monochrome" as a huge issue. It's the heart nebula... it's pretty darn red, that's just the way it is.

True colours image is the only way to judge. And there is more colour depth and nuances to even that emission/reflection nebula. Obviously you're going to miss it by using a L-extreme filter. You can only play it in NB false colours and that's the end of it.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about:

Related discussions
[RCC] - Omega Centauri - my first attempt at a Glob
Hi all, I found this one very difficult to process and wonder I anyone can see any glaring deficiencies in my process. https://www.astrobin.com/oa8n80/ Acquisition details in the picture link. Processing Workflow: Stacked in Pixinsight using WBPP (si...
Similar multi-night project seeking processing feedback and critique.
Apr 29, 2023
[RCC] M101 Redux
After taking some feedback from my last attempt I decided to start fresh with a new data set https://www.astrobin.com/20t4vd/ I think I over did the saturation a bit, but I liked the way it looked and some feedback from my first attempt said it lacke...
Iterative improvement approach with new dataset after receiving feedback.
May 10, 2023
[RCC] NGC 7023 - The Iris nebula
This is my first topic on the forum I'm kindly asking about constructive critique of my Iris nebula. Frames acquired from Poland, Bortle 5, maybe Bortle 4 around this sky area (lower LP). Nearly 14 hours, L: 7 hours and RGB: 6 hours. Camera: ASI ...
First nebula critique request; similar learning phase and feedback-seeking.
Jul 19, 2023
RCC - M51, 4 hours from Bortle 5, is there more possible?
Hi, this is round about 4 hours at data, at 450mm reduced with an Apo 80mm f/7 natively. My usual equipment. I shot around 4 hours of data at Bortle 5, and I'm just not content, there's no H-Alpha visible at all (okay I didn't use a H-Alp...
Deep sky object processing feedback; optimizing data from limited conditions.
Apr 25, 2023
[RCC] Heart nebula. First time looking for feedback!
So I've always been more of a lurker of forums than interacting, but I've enjoyed where the astrophotography journey has taken me and would love to know more about how to do more with my images and such. Going to do an info dump below on the ...
Heart nebula feedback request; appears to be duplicate or related post.
Oct 9, 2023