Georg N. Nyman:
well, not easy to decide, I agree. My personal experiences with Astronomik are very good, I do not have any Astrodon filters, but I have got Optolong and ZWO. ZWO are "bread and butter" filters - they work, they are OK, but nothing spectacular. Baader are very fine and I would put them into the same performance class with Optolong. Astronomik - yes, very good and, what I liked very much, I was able to get a special diameter for a Ha filter for one of my Nikon mirror lenses - not much surplus price and all that within about 3 weeks delivery. Chroma sounds interesting because they are reknown to be excellent and are a bit less expensive compared to Astrodon - a set about 100 Dollar less. I don't know, what I would do, I know from my experience, that I first got a set LRGB from ZWO and later on I bought a better one from Astronomik.... I think, that is exactly, what you want to avoid, right? Well, probably I would go and gice Chroma a try, it can't be wrong...
I do have two sets of LRGB but from Cyclops Optics, called LUX-Series, the seller i bought from who also selling Optolong told me that it is better performance than Optolong, and i assume that means it will put it at Astronomik [not DEEP Sky] level and below Astrodon/Chroma, i did give it a test for DSO and i didn't like the results much, but for planetary it is amazing, but that could be my scope and my bad processing, i mean i didn't give it much test and yet i want to buy something else, the reason is as following:
1. I have QHY163M with 36mm, so this Lux-Series 36mm is fine because i am using Optolong narrowbanding SHO filters 36mm with it, and i won't buy high end at this size, but i am thinking to replace Optolong 36mm filters once by one slowly with something narrower but not from Astrodon or Chroma, so this set is done.
2. I do planetary with mono and color cameras, and i bought the second set of this Lux-series at the size of 1.25", and i don't need to change that, it is doing the job, for planetary i don't need the best of the best anyway, all filters will do the job even ZWO cheap one, but good i have a better one.
3. I had Astrodon Ha 5nm in the past at 1.25" and never giving it up, but i couldn't buy more Astrodon NB filters before, so i ended up buying Chroma OIII/SII instead, and this set now i need a separate extra LRGB at 1.25" for it, i don't want to swap/flip between planetary and DSO, so i will buy the final one, but i don't know which one to buy to match this Astrodon/Chroma filters, sometimes i was thinking about parfocal, but with autofocuser later i don't think having them all at same thickness won't be necessary, i mean i will be forced to spend more but maybe the results will be the same or can't see the difference, only i pay more for the name or design quality, but again, i don't mind if i have to.
I don't want to buy something and regret it, also most people are feeling better to have big name brand even if it doesn't add much, so someone with Astrodon/Chroma filters for example and scopes like Planewave or AP or Tak many will look at them as WOW, brand name also a trademark that some fall in trap for, i can't test them all to see which one i like more, the one i have so far sounds not good with bad scopes, while with good scopes it will perform nicely, now there are even more LRGB sets out making it more difficult to choose, in my mind i know that Astrodon/Chroma/Astronomuk those three are the top choices, then my set and Baader and Optolong, but even with the top three choices i must choose one really, sometimes i feel i want to go with Chroma for less price or Astronomik which is even cheaper, or with Astrodon because they have two series and they are known for quality since long time ago, and i can't just depend on one person experience/review there.