[RCC] sh2-155

Topic starter

Sep 21, 2023 · Edited: Sep 21, 2023

Hi there,

First time using the RCC thread. I've just completed a 21 hour Cave Nebula in SHO. Details and image here:

https://www.astrobin.com/jvtcv8/

This was processed using a starless workflow in PI using Bill Blanshan's unlinked stretch then GHS to make some minor adjustments to black point. my focus was to bring out the dark dust lanes as best as possible whilst also keeping noise in check.

I sharpened this image using a combination of unsharp mask in PS, BXT and the detail slider in NXT.

If I'm being completely honest, this is more than I usually sharpen and absolutely as far as I'd be comfortable doing so. But I'm interested to hear what some more experienced imagers have to say on that.

I'm six months into the hobby and have now been imaging in mono narrowband for about 4 months.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Chris

Well Written Helpful Respectful Engaging

Lasse Skov

Sep 21, 2023 · Edited: Sep 21, 2023

Hi Chris

I won't call myself and "experienced imager" by any means but I think this is really about personal preference. I'm guilty of sometime sharpening a bit too much using BXT - but I always try to aim for something that looks somewhat "natural" (whatever that really means when we're taking narrowband).

I think your image looks really really great - but I would personally sharpen a bit less so it's not so obvious that BXT was used. But again - it's about personal preference

Respectful Supportive

dkamen

Sep 21, 2023

I like it.

Tim Ray

Sep 21, 2023

Hi Chris,

The image looks great. I like the sharpness (as you say), however, I think you were a touch heavy on the LHE (Dark structure enhancement), if your using PixInsight…

I run NXT between 15 and 25 on the bottom slider.
BXT I leave the top slider at default and move the Reduce halo slider anywhere between 0 and -24, usually around -12ish. the bottom section is default.

Try LHE to help enhance the dark structure

Its a nebula. It should be softer than a lunar, solar or planetary image. If the subject supports a lot of sharpness go for it. I would not increase it any further with this image.

Hope this helps

CS Tim

Helpful

Chris Evans

Topic starter

Sep 21, 2023

Lasse Skov:
Hi Chris

I won't call myself and "experienced imager" by any means but I think this is really about personal preference. I'm guilty of sometime sharpening a bit too much using BXT - but I always try to aim for something that looks somewhat "natural" (whatever that really means when we're taking narrowband).

I think your image looks really really great - but I would personally sharpen a bit less so it's not so obvious that BXT was used. But again - it's about personal preference

Thanks Lasse, for sure I will do a revision with less sharpening.

Well Written Respectful

Chris Evans

Topic starter

Sep 21, 2023

Tim Ray:
Hi Chris,

The image looks great. I like the sharpness (as you say), however, I think you were a touch heavy on the LHE (Dark structure enhancement), if your using PixInsight...

I run NXT between 15 and 25 on the bottom slider.
BXT I leave the top slider at default and move the Reduce halo slider anywhere between 0 and -24, usually around -12ish. the bottom section is default.

Try LHE to help enhance the dark structure

Its a nebula. It should be softer than a lunar, solar or planetary image. If the subject supports a lot of sharpness go for it. I would not increase it any further with this image.

Hope this helps

CS Tim

Thanks Tim, never used LHE so I'll give that a go. Cheers for your BXT and NXT suggestions. Have you had any luck with "sharpen non-stellar then stellar" in BXT?

Tim Ray

Sep 21, 2023

I have played with that setting in BXT. When I did play, I saw no difference with it checked or not. So I left it default and left it unchecked. I might not have had data that benefitted from that option. I don't know. However, Play!!!! If you see a change or an improvement, go with it…

CS Tim

Related discussions

Keeping stars their natural colour

I'm really keen to keep stars their natural colour whilst also delving into the world of narrowband. My first attempt is the Crescent nebula below where I used Ha data combined with LRGB. Please would you point me at any other examples of this &#...

SHO narrowband example similar to author's HaRGB interest in nebulae.

Nov 13, 2021

Applying BXT as final step in processing

I was wondering if an application of BXT to the final image would be beneficial in some instances in improving the detail lurking within an image. Now I understand the science behind the BXT tool (that it should only be used in the linear state since...

BXT sharpening technique directly relevant to author's processing workflow.

Apr 10, 2025

[RCC] Trying to process at a more advanced level

I feel like I've hit a bit of a wall with my processing skills and am struggling to know where to look to make improvements. So far, I've learned most of what I know by following YouTube tutorials (The usual channels) but I'm looking for ...

Advanced processing improvements align with author's demonstrated skill level.

Mar 12, 2025

RCC: Please critique my dumbbell nebula (I’m new to mono imaging).

Hi all, I’m new to mono imaging and would like some honest feedback about my latest image. I use a very basic, straight forward SHO workflow in pixinsight. I usually struggle with stars and my background. In this case, I feel like the whole image jus...

SHO workflow and mono imaging processing techniques match author's methods.

Jul 14, 2025

[RCC] Honest Critique of my M51 Image

Hi there! I've doing astrophotography quite some time, and the processing gives me headaches. Once you get your head around Pixinsight, a new update is released (mars database for instance) and your whole workflow needs to be altered and you need...

Pixinsight processing challenges and techniques relevant to author's workflow.

Apr 22, 2025

Is this image oversharpened

Related discussions