Esprit 100 & Starizona 0.65 Reducer

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED Reducer Coma
4 replies•692 views
Christian Schulbert avatar
Christian Schulbert avatar
Hi,
I got a Starizona 0.65 Reducer for my 100 ED. The nominal backfocus distance should be 58 mm. I tested a lot, but I got always elongated stars in the corners, which indicates, the camera (APS-C-IMX571) is too close. I am now at 59.5 mm and still get elongated stars. Has anyone found a working distance with this combo?

Clear skies,
Chris
Andreas Kenda avatar
Andreas Kenda avatar
Hi Chris,

I am using the same combo and started by accident at 60mm backfocus. I did not like that BFL as I got tangentially deformed stars. I am now at 58.5-59mm which is the nominal 58mm + 0.7mm to account for the 2mm thick filter. I think it is working better in terms of getting small stars round. However, bright stars produce violent bursts: https://www.astrobin.com/full/fq0wcd/0/
Do you see the same effect?

CS, Andy
Helpful Engaging Supportive
Jan Erik Vallestad avatar
Jan Erik Vallestad avatar
Following this as I have been keen to add a smaller FL option, but a working reducer could also be an option. I've always been a bit skeptical towards the Starizona though as I haven't really seen any compelling results or a general consensus considering backfocus.
Don avatar
Don avatar
Following this as I have been keen to add a smaller FL option, but a working reducer could also be an option. I've always been a bit skeptical I use towards the Starizona though as I haven't really seen any compelling results or a general consensus considering backfocus.

I use the 3” Explore Scientific .7x. It works really well on multiple scopes
Christian Schulbert avatar
Christian Schulbert avatar
Andreas Kenda:
Hi Chris,

I am using the same combo and started by accident at 60mm backfocus. I did not like that BFL as I got tangentially deformed stars. I am now at 58.5-59mm which is the nominal 58mm + 0.7mm to account for the 2mm thick filter. I think it is working better in terms of getting small stars round. However, bright stars produce violent bursts: https://www.astrobin.com/full/fq0wcd/0/
Do you see the same effect?

CS, Andy

Hi Andy,

due to the bad weather, I could not make any progress on my experiments with the backfocus. But I think, 58+0.7 could be really the sweet spot. I can also confirm those burst on bright stars like here: https://www.astrobin.com/full/8mya6n/0/

I wouldn't bother me a lot, but BlurXterminator doesn't seem to handle those bursts nicely. Especially, if those bright stars a in the corners. BlurX corrects for the shape of the star, but not for the burst halo. That is surely because, it wasn't trained with images from the Apex-L reducer.

Clear skies,
Chris
Helpful Respectful Concise
Related discussions
ESPRIT 100 + RICCARDI 0.75 REDUCER BACKFOCUS ADJUSTMENT. CRAZIEST!
Hi i´m a owner of esprit 100 with sw flattener and i love this combo . In last week i get the riccardi 0.75 x reducer but I'm trying to adjust the backfocus. I've seen in the documentation that for this reducer, the distance for this scope va...
Similar backfocus adjustment challenge with different reducer on ED telescope.
May 29, 2025
How can I improve star shapes?
I recently acquired a new telescope and while first light was successful, I am a bit concerned about star shapes in the corners of my image especially as it's not a cheap scope and I am using a small sensor by today's standards. My imaging tr...
Directly addresses elongated stars in corners issue author is experiencing.
Jan 28, 2025
Proper backfocus with x0.63 reducer
I’ve been struggling quite a bit with dialing in the correct backfocus for the f/6.3 setup using the reducer, aiming to get as close as possible to the theoretical focal length — 1280.16 mm (2032 mm × 0.63). The originally proposed distance of 105 mm...
Backfocus tuning problem with reducer on ED scope, highly relevant.
Apr 22, 2025