Chris Addison avatar
Heres what I’m working with.

HEQ5 pro (Rowan belt upgrade) 
ASI 294mc 
ASIAIR Plus via Ipad 
ZWO EAF 
Z73 scope 
30mm guide scope 
ASI120mm guide camera 

I’m 4/5 months into this hobby, i have noticed I’m getting bad numbers on my guiding 4/5” total error. Other people with similar set up are getting 1” and less.

I have focused the guide camera.
Dew heaters on guide and main scope.
No cable drag.
No winds.
Solid foundation.

The only thing I can think of is the RA seems abit sticky/stiff nothing major. HEQ5 mount is still new at 4/5 months old.

Could this be the issue? 

any help Would be great.
Thanks
Zi Ang Jia avatar
Are your guidescope focal length/pixel scale set correctly on PHD2? Are you balancing correctly? What is your guide cams exposure time? Have you polar aligned properly? Are you calibrating near DEC 0? The problem is you haven't provided enough information for us to help you much right now. There are lots of factors that can affect guiding.
Helpful
Kurt Van Wagenen avatar
The tight sticky movement is very common with this mount and can be corrected easily.   I had the same problem you're describing with the same bad numbers, I now have sub arcsec tracking any time the weather is nice...  I also added the belt drive mod from Rowan, which is common for this mount, that helps a lot too.

There are many videos about how to clean up the HEQ5 on YouTube.  My advice is to watch them, but you won't need to do the full 'hypertune' thing... There is no need (*usually) to spend a bunch of money on bearings, the bearings in mine were excellent quality Swiss bearings.

However, you will discover that the RA and DEC axis are over tightened.   By watching any of the hypertune videos you will learn how it all works and that makes it really easy to loosen things up and get it moving more freely which will help a ton with your guiding.

I am linking one below, this is the one I found to be the most direct, with the fewest naive assumptions... But again.. Just loosen things up a bit and see how you do before spending $150 on new bearings.  Afterwords adjust your lash and such as the video explains... You'll probably be much happier.  I know I was, and I now understand the machine a lot better also.

https://youtu.be/lwZnLkzNQlw
Helpful Engaging Supportive
Kurt Van Wagenen avatar
Also probably worthy of note that your star shapes in your images look good (I didn't get all pixel peeping about it, just at a glance) so it seems like PHD2 is working through the stiffness ok.  PHD2 Developer often says "Don't worry about the numbers, if the star shapes are good, then the guiding is working just fine."

And that is correct, but, freeing up the movement means a lot less work for your motors, etc.  So… Do with that as you will.
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Chris Addison avatar
Kurt Van Wagenen:
The tight sticky movement is very common with this mount and can be corrected easily.   I had the same problem you're describing with the same bad numbers, I now have sub arcsec tracking any time the weather is nice...  I also added the belt drive mod from Rowan, which is common for this mount, that helps a lot too.

There are many videos about how to clean up the HEQ5 on YouTube.  My advice is to watch them, but you won't need to do the full 'hypertune' thing... There is no need (*usually) to spend a bunch of money on bearings, the bearings in mine were excellent quality Swiss bearings.

However, you will discover that the RA and DEC axis are over tightened.   By watching any of the hypertune videos you will learn how it all works and that makes it really easy to loosen things up and get it moving more freely which will help a ton with your guiding.

I am linking one below, this is the one I found to be the most direct, with the fewest naive assumptions... But again.. Just loosen things up a bit and see how you do before spending $150 on new bearings.  Afterwords adjust your lash and such as the video explains... You'll probably be much happier.  I know I was, and I now understand the machine a lot better also.

https://youtu.be/lwZnLkzNQlw

Thanks Kurt.

Yes it doesn’t seem to effect my stars at all but I thought I must be doing something wrong. 
I have already got the Rowan belt conversion, I will watch that video.
Thanks again
Chris Addison avatar
Zi Ang Jia:
Are your guidescope focal length/pixel scale set correctly on PHD2? Are you balancing correctly? What is your guide cams exposure time? Have you polar aligned properly? Are you calibrating near DEC 0? The problem is you haven't provided enough information for us to help you much right now. There are lots of factors that can affect guiding.

Im controlling it all by ASIAIR plus via Ipad.

Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).

All balanced correctly.

Polar Aligned usually to error of 00.01.30".

Calibrated and re calibrated. What is this Calibrating near DEC 0? ive never heard this before with the ASIAIR?

Guide cam exposure usually 2 seconds.

300sec subs, don't seem to see any star elongation, but I just wondered if I was doing something wrong as I've seen a lot of people with same set up get sub 1 arc second. Or am i just chasing numbers and shouldn't be worried.

Thanks for your reply.
Chris
DavesView avatar
Chris,
I'm working with the same mount and controller as your setup. Also at the same focal length with my flattener/reducer. Been doing this since end  of Jan/23, no expert, but I can relate what I went through. Out of the box I was getting .5" or worse. I had plenty of stiction in the mount and didn't address it right off. The first thing I did was change my guide scope from the 30mm ZWO to the W.O. 50mm uniguide. That helped greatly. I then started seeing .2x" to .3x" when seeing was good (Bortle 6 or worse backyard). There are two groups when it comes to leveling the mount. Those that give it importance and those that don't. I'm in that first group.  Do not believe the mount bubble level. It is probably wrong. Level your tripod with a torpedo level and then check your mount bubble level. If you find it off, using some sort of tap (common blade screw driver), after leveling the tripod, make the mount bubble level match. Tap up from the bottom (align the eyepiece tray so that a large eyepiece hole sits directly below the bubble level hole). Note: place the blade of the screwdriver to the side up in the hole so that it rests on the plastic bushing surrounding the bubble level and 'baby steps'. I only use the mount level as a check after setting the mount on the tripod to see if I changed anything. I do not have the belt upgrade... yet. I did replace all the bearings with Timken bearings, except for the worm drive bearings. They are SKF. I can now spin the mount, RA and DEC like a top. Enclosed are a couple of ASIair Plus screen shots from my Samsung phone that I use to control everything. Hope it helps. Bad guiding stinks!


Helpful Supportive
DavesView avatar
Chris Addison:
Zi Ang Jia:
Are your guidescope focal length/pixel scale set correctly on PHD2? Are you balancing correctly? What is your guide cams exposure time? Have you polar aligned properly? Are you calibrating near DEC 0? The problem is you haven't provided enough information for us to help you much right now. There are lots of factors that can affect guiding.

Im controlling it all by ASIAIR plus via Ipad.

Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).

All balanced correctly.

Polar Aligned usually to error of 00.01.30".

Calibrated and re calibrated. What is this Calibrating near DEC 0? ive never heard this before with the ASIAIR?

Guide cam exposure usually 2 seconds.

300sec subs, don't seem to see any star elongation, but I just wondered if I was doing something wrong as I've seen a lot of people with same set up get sub 1 arc second. Or am i just chasing numbers and shouldn't be worried.

Thanks for your reply.
Chris

One other note: I normally polar align to within .0x" , not 01.xx" and mostly use the ASIair 3 plate alignment method. I also have the PoleMaster and use it when I am on the north side of my backyard. Are you using the mount polar scope? If so, try the ASIair All-Sky Polar Align, 3 plate alignment. You'll have to enable it in the ASIair under the 'i' icon.
Helpful Concise
Chris Addison avatar
Chris,
I'm working with the same mount and controller as your setup. Also at the same focal length with my flattener/reducer. Been doing this since end  of Jan/23, no expert, but I can relate what I went through. Out of the box I was getting .5" or worse. I had plenty of stiction in the mount and didn't address it right off. The first thing I did was change my guide scope from the 30mm ZWO to the W.O. 50mm uniguide. That helped greatly. I then started seeing .2x" to .3x" when seeing was good (Bortle 6 or worse backyard). There are two groups when it comes to leveling the mount. Those that give it importance and those that don't. I'm in that first group.  Do not believe the mount bubble level. It is probably wrong. Level your tripod with a torpedo level and then check your mount bubble level. If you find it off, using some sort of tap (common blade screw driver), after leveling the tripod, make the mount bubble level match. Tap up from the bottom (align the eyepiece tray so that a large eyepiece hole sits directly below the bubble level hole). Note: place the blade of the screwdriver to the side up in the hole so that it rests on the plastic bushing surrounding the bubble level and 'baby steps'. I only use the mount level as a check after setting the mount on the tripod to see if I changed anything. I do not have the belt upgrade... yet. I did replace all the bearings with Timken bearings, except for the worm drive bearings. They are SKF. I can now spin the mount, RA and DEC like a top. Enclosed are a couple of ASIair Plus screen shots from my Samsung phone that I use to control everything. Hope it helps. Bad guiding stinks!



Wow David, thanks for the reply.

Amazing I think I have a lot to learn.

I always went by the bubble on my tripod. Also your guiding looks awesome, when I say Total error of 5/4 I mean e.g 4.66”. Best I’ve had is 2.85”.

So I’m obviously doing something wrong looking at your guiding results. 
I’m in Bortle 5 West Midlands England. 
I’ve watched a few YouTube videos of re greasing and new bearings but I’m not that confident in taking my mount apart and reassembling it, abit daunting to say the least. 
Next clear night I will concentrate on better polar alignment I’m just to eager to start shooting. 

appreciate the response 
Chris
DavesView avatar
Chris,
Yeah! Pretty confident that if you level and align correctly, you can get to near 1.xx" or lower in clear skies. Then comes the tweaking. Which polar alignment method are you using? Of the previous three screen shots, the first was before tackling any problems @ .7x" total out of the box. Normally, if I am guiding at anywhere near 1.xx", then I'm ready to fix something or close up shop for the night, which has been rare so far. I see numbers sneak in like 1.xx" when the seeing changes on me (haze rolls in). Also, you mentioned England, haze is a killer on guiding.
Chris Addison avatar
Chris,
Yeah! Pretty confident that if you level and align correctly, you can get to near 1.xx" or lower in clear skies. Then comes the tweaking. Which polar alignment method are you using? Of the previous three screen shots, the first was before tackling any problems @ .7x" total out of the box. Normally, if I am guiding at anywhere near 1.xx", then I'm ready to fix something or close up shop for the night, which has been rare so far. I see numbers sneak in like 1.xx" when the seeing changes on me (haze rolls in). Also, you mentioned England, haze is a killer on guiding.

Nice one David I’m excited to try it.

erm I’ve never polar aligned using the scope I’ve always used the ASIair. I just click P.A in the app and away I go.
I’m pretty lucky as I can see North East West, only South is abit restricted because of my house. 

Yes England is a pain with weather but I have had some crystal clear nights in the last 4 months since I embarked this journey.

Light nights is the problem for us now as it goes dark about 11:30pm then light about 2/3am. Lucking forward to the winter so I can spend many hours improving.

Thanks Chris.
Joe Linington avatar
If nothing else, adjust the Ra and if you can the Dec axis. You don’t have to perform a full tear down. I don’t have your mount but have an EQM-35 and EQ6R and both were out of adjustment when I got them. No need to torture yourself striving for perfect level and alignment with your scope. I get the mount "level enough" and polar align with sharpcap to around 1 arc minute and have no issues guiding around 0.6 with my EQ6 and 1.2 with the EQM. In both cases that’s better than the sampling of the rig riding on the mount. I’ll image until the guiding is below the sampling. This can happen due to bad seeing. Nothing I can do when the seeing isn’t there. My mini scope can guide my mount more than well enough. The seeing is usually the limit not the guide scope. Using my OAG at 571mm I have once seen my rig guide at 0.3 arc seconds for about an hour but most days 0.6 is the seeing limit. My 30mm mini scope guides just fine to 0.6 arc seconds or better so no real advantage unless you have great seeing. 

If you are on soft ground, make foot pads for the mount. I just cut up a pressure treated fence board into pieces about 8 inches long and that made 8 inch by 5.5 inch foot pads that aren’t to thick.
Helpful
daywalker avatar
Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).
Thats your guide scope focal length?
Chris Addison avatar
Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).
Thats your guide scope focal length?

No Z73 main scope 430mm 
Guide Scope 30mm 

all checked and checked again.
daywalker avatar
Chris Addison:
Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).
Thats your guide scope focal length?

No Z73 main scope 430mm 
Guide Scope 30mm 

all checked and checked again.

and your using the focal length of the guide scope in your guiding software(not the 430mm.)The 430 mm of the main scope doesn't come into it,unless you were using an OAG. Sorry have to ask it may just be the way it reads and interpreting this wrong
Chris Addison avatar
Chris Addison:
Focal length all set accordingly (430mm).
Thats your guide scope focal length?

No Z73 main scope 430mm 
Guide Scope 30mm 

all checked and checked again.

and your using the focal length of the guide scope in your guiding software(not the 430mm.)The 430 mm of the main scope doesn't come into it,unless you were using an OAG. Sorry have to ask it may just be the way it reads and interpreting this wrong

Yes Sorry I’m using 430mm for my main scope and 30mm for my guide scope.

ASIAIR asks for my Main scope (430mm)
Guide Scope (30mm).
Usually all Automatically.
All in correct box’s.

I was just stating what focal length I was at, as I know the larger focal length the more harder guiding gets. 
Thanks Chris
daywalker avatar
ive never used an ASI air..

is it not asking for your guide scopes focal length?
Because i doubt very much it is 30.
Is 30 not its aperture?

if your sing 30 as the focal length then this would explain the high error number.

what guide scope do you have?
Joe Linington avatar
Your guide scope is most likely 120mm focal length. The common 30mm f/4 scopes sold under many names is 120mm focal length. Which also means if you divide your reported guiding number by 4, you are around 1-1.2 arc seconds which is more than good enough for a 430mm telescope with the big pixels of the 294mc.
Helpful
Chris Addison avatar
ive never used an ASI air..

is it not asking for your guide scopes focal length?
Because i doubt very much it is 30.
Is 30 not its aperture?

if your sing 30 as the focal length then this would explain the high error number.

what guide scope do you have?

Wow Daywalker…

I can’t believe it you are spot on I’ve been putting 30mm as my guide scope focal length, when in fact it’s 120mm. 
I have the ZWO 30mm f/4 Mini Guide Scope

What an idiot I am, I was close to dismantling my mount. 

Thank you for your input i would never of come to this conclusion.

Thanks again Chris
Chris Addison avatar
Joe Linington:
Your guide scope is most likely 120mm focal length. The common 30mm f/4 scopes sold under many names is 120mm focal length. Which also means if you divide your reported guiding number by 4, you are around 1-1.2 arc seconds which is more than good enough for a 430mm telescope with the big pixels of the 294mc.

Joe, You are correct I’m a fool and have been putting 30mm as my guide scope focal length instead of 120mm. 

Thanks for you input much appreciated.
Chris.
daywalker avatar
Chris Addison:
ive never used an ASI air..

is it not asking for your guide scopes focal length?
Because i doubt very much it is 30.
Is 30 not its aperture?

if your sing 30 as the focal length then this would explain the high error number.

what guide scope do you have?

Wow Daywalker…

I can’t believe it you are spot on I’ve been putting 30mm as my guide scope focal length, when in fact it’s 120mm. 
I have the ZWO 30mm f/4 Mini Guide Scope

What an idiot I am, I was close to dismantling my mount. 

Thank you for your input i would never of come to this conclusion.

Thanks again Chris

We have all been there.Glad it was somthing simple.
DavesView avatar
Chris Addison:
Joe Linington:
Your guide scope is most likely 120mm focal length. The common 30mm f/4 scopes sold under many names is 120mm focal length. Which also means if you divide your reported guiding number by 4, you are around 1-1.2 arc seconds which is more than good enough for a 430mm telescope with the big pixels of the 294mc.

Joe, You are correct I’m a fool and have been putting 30mm as my guide scope focal length instead of 120mm. 

Thanks for you input much appreciated.
Chris.

Chris,
Good find by Daywalker. These seasoned astronomers sure are a huge help. Have you had a chance to take your scope out since discovery? If so, what were your numbers? I had looked at your Astrobin pics and the pics were far better than the really bad numbers.
Chris Addison avatar
Hi @David Lindsay 
Oh yes I’m grateful for all the advice.

luckily the same night I read joes comment it was a clear night so I raced to test it out.

I spent more time on my PA to get better numbers, I also levelled my scope which I’ve never done before (not with the mounts level). 

Here are my Average numbers. I’m very happy with the results. 


Cheers David.
Chris
Joe Linington avatar
What a jump. 0.53 is great guiding.