I was imaging the spaghetti Nebula for the night and Mars was close by which made locating the Nebula super easy.
However during post processing I had to stretch the image by alot. The nebula was able to pop out but since mars was also close by I think its glare might be whitewashing the nebula. I make that assumption because the left side of the image (the area closest to Mars) is brighter then the left side.
So is all that gradient coming from mars or is it just the way stretches work ?
If the glare is caused by Mars should I dispose my old subs and start anew when Mars gets out of the way or should I keep my current subs and continue to process with them with new subs?
If you have to know I was using a canon t5i with 135mm Rokinon with astronomik 12nm Ha filter attached
Thank You!

However during post processing I had to stretch the image by alot. The nebula was able to pop out but since mars was also close by I think its glare might be whitewashing the nebula. I make that assumption because the left side of the image (the area closest to Mars) is brighter then the left side.
So is all that gradient coming from mars or is it just the way stretches work ?
If the glare is caused by Mars should I dispose my old subs and start anew when Mars gets out of the way or should I keep my current subs and continue to process with them with new subs?
If you have to know I was using a canon t5i with 135mm Rokinon with astronomik 12nm Ha filter attached
Thank You!
