ASIAir versus Nina on miniPC?

I have both, ASIAir on my small setup when traveling because it is easy to operate, maintain and to setup. It is also very light and compact and it works exceptionally well. But I am using NINA and a miniPC on the bigger scopes because it provides a high degree of flexibility and free choice of hardware.
CS, John

All-in-one design and ease of use are two that come to mind. Assuming you've got the compatible hardware (mount, focuser, camera, etc), then the AAP is a single box solution for control and capture. It's got DC power points, USB ports, built-in WIFI, storage and a dedicated app that'll run on your phone or tablet.

Consider, too, the cost. $300. To get something similar, you need a PC, Pegasus powerbox and wifi router. A Pegasus PPBA alone will cost you more (currently $329) than that AAP.

Note - I run NINA on a Beelink miniPC, power and USB is through a PPBA and I have a wifi router. The advantage of that kind of system is in its modularity and full-featured programs (i.e. PHD2, NINA). The choice to go this route was more driven by incompatible hardware (Pegasus focuser and QHY guide camera) than any philosophical love/hate of one system or the other.

Jonny Bravo:
To get something similar, you need a PC, Pegasus powerbox and wifi router. A Pegasus PPBA alone will cost you more (currently $329) than that AAP.

FWIW:  I don't see a need to use a Pegasus PPBA for my setup ... I just use the power supply that came with my mount plus the USB ports on my miniPC. (N.B. My Newtonian doesn't need dew heaters).  The Mele Quieter3 PC is also less than £230 at the moment, so pretty cost-effective.  I did fork out on a wifi powerline extender, however, which cost me £60.  So, £290 in total which is about £50 less than the ASIAir Plus.