You Can Be Successful with DSLR - RGB

Light Polluted skies 1 reply127 views
Gordon Hansen avatar
I agree that narrow band works in light polluted skies, but, you can get good images without them. I image from a Bortle 6 zone and the trick is to take many hours of exposures. I posted my M42 from last winter. A total of 3.6 hours using a modified Canon 6D.  That’s on the low end of integration. I typically try for 6 hours or more. I also try for targets above 40 degrees in altitude - the higher the better.

Gordon
Well written Helpful Engaging Supportive
Wido's AstroForum avatar
Gordon Hansen:
I agree that narrow band works in light polluted skies, but, you can get good images without them. I image from a Bortle 6 zone and the trick is to take many hours of exposures. I posted my M42 from last winter. A total of 3.6 hours using a modified Canon 6D.  That’s on the low end of integration. I typically try for 6 hours or more. I also try for targets above 40 degrees in altitude - the higher the better.Gordon


I completely agree Gordon. This also works in a same way for narrowband. The more data the higher quality picture you get. Reading your message has convinced me not to switch to a second target tonight. I'm staying with the California Nebula :-).

Thanks for sharing! 8)
Related discussions
Drizzle with refiltered EOS6D: peanut stars & star eater - SOLVED
Given the time spent scratching my head on this one, I thought sharing my experience might spare others a few headaches. When two years ago I started to drizzle the subs taken with my refiltered EOS6D, I was always getting stars that looked like in I...
Addresses Canon 6D-specific imaging issues relevant to poster's camera choice.
Aug 6, 2021