I still have issues with my imaging train and/or my guiding - any thoughts

Andy WrayDan WattJacob Heppellkuechlew
29 replies1.2k views
Andy Wray avatar
I tried a quick capture of the elephant's trunk tonight and this is my first 10 frames.  The stars are awful and I'm trying to work out if it is my imaging train being out of alignment, my backfocus or my guiding.  Any thoughts?



Quick Ha Elephant's trunk
David Redwine avatar
By awful do you mean square?
Andy Wray avatar
David Redwine:
By awful do you mean square?

Not really ... I can see that they change shape over the field from oval to square and even triangular.  I think I probably have multiple issues here that I need to address.
Steve Solon avatar
Hi Andy,
Looks like the stars are slightly stretched away from center toward the left and right - a possible misalignment or collimation issue? Any concerns with backlash, pinpoint guide stars, etc.? Did you check each of the subs individually for "one bad character"? Just a few suggestions.

– Steve
Helpful Insightful Respectful
David Moore avatar
What focusser do you have? I also have the 200PDS.
andrea tasselli avatar
You have the usual triangular shape (that pimary cell stuck still there, isn't it?) plus miscollimation so that the "good" portion is the far upper right corner. Now you need to move the "good" portion toward the centre of the image in terms of collimation, something you can do with the imaging train in place.
Jeff Reitzel avatar
The slight V-shapes I see in the large stars remind me of what I see when my collimation is just a bit off with my 11 inch SCT.  Blowing the image up I do not see everything off in the same direction. More like a spiral pattern around the image. I don't think that would be tracking or guiding error but could indicate the camera sensor spacing is just a little too far away.  Like others said it is difficult to tell with the info provided. Either way it is not much off. If it is a spacing problem a 1-2 mm change should let you know right away if that is the issue and what direction to proceed. BTW if spacing is too close you will see star trails pointing out toward the corners of the image instead of spiraling around it. My guess would be a slight bit of both errors going on. Good luck. These issues can be a bit of a tedious challenge to correct.
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Andy Wray avatar
Just checked my imaging train in daylight hours.  Two things I found:

* My coma corrector was slightly loose in the focusser; that would have introduced some tilt for a start.  (I have been trying not to overtighten the screws on the focusser, but I guess I was too gentle with them)
* My primary collimation had gone off in between me collimating inside and setting up the rig outside

From now on I guess I will check the collimation every time after having set up the rig as well as  making sure there is absolutely nothing loose.

On the plus side:  the secondary was still dead centre on the primary centre spot smile
Helpful Concise
Andy Wray avatar
David Moore:
What focusser do you have? I also have the 200PDS.

I have reverted back to the stock focusser as the low profile one I purchased to replace it was even worse.  I have replaced the original screw connection with a compression ring fitting.
David Moore avatar
I did the same re the comprssion fitting but it did not help collimation. I have a long coma corrector and it was a very sloppy fit at the scope end as there are 2 different diameters inside the focusser leading to slop at the far end. Mating up the coma corrector against the end of the focusser did not correct for tilt. I checked this out using feeler gauges between the corrector and the focusser wall when the focusser was off.  When I took the focusser off I could see, by laying a ruler right across the scope and adjusting the focusser position to be flat with the end that it was not aligned properly so I adjusted the 3 adjustment screws. I also packed the inside of the focusser with gorilla tape untill the coma corrector was a friction fit inside. I tapped a 3rd 120 degree screw thread (it only had 2) into the compression fitting I bought, to even up any remaining slack at the camera end. In practice there doesn't seem to be any.
I bought shims to correct for any errors in backfocus and have tried the out of focus star test for collimation though I have found my Cheshire eyepiece and Hotech laser collimator agree well and they collimate well. I may need to further refine backfocus. I also checked the laser collimator was itself collimated.
If you still want to remove the mirror I have done that by drifting it out gently at the mirror support edges, otherwise it was not possible. I uses a metal drift and hammer gently. It came out easily tapping around the diameter a little at a time. Getting it back requires easing over the metal tube join on the inside with a thin flat blade screwdriver. It is a sticking point.
After struggling for ages I now have very little tilt or none according the the ASTAP software. 
I have installed a mirror edge mask to remove sparkly light streaks radiating off the centre of bright stars. If you look at recent images of mine compared with older ones the improvement is obvious. I hope this helps.
My stars are not perfect but better than they were so that's progress.
Helpful
Dan Watt avatar
This looks a lot like pinched optics to me. How tight are your mirror clips?
Well written Engaging
Andy Wray avatar
Dan Watt:
This looks a lot like pinched optics to me. How tight are your mirror clips?

Long story which a lot of people on here are fed up of hearing about ..... try as I might I have been unable to remove my primary despite loads of suggestions from people on here .... totally stuck .... and yes, I have tried very hard more than 10 times now to remove it.
kuechlew avatar
How about sending it in to the manufacturer - or maybe your vendor knows a good repair facility? Seems to me like you won't resolve your issues without addressing this topic.

Good luck and clear skies
Wolfgang
Andy Wray avatar
How about sending it in to the manufacturer - or maybe your vendor knows a good repair facility? Seems to me like you won't resolve your issues without addressing this topic.

Good luck and clear skies
Wolfgang

Thanks Wolgang and I do tend to agree with you.  Unfortunately the OTA only cost about £350 new in the first place, so the cost of having it fixed would probably outweigh that.  I should probably replace it with a higher quality OTA, however my wife gave it to me as a birthday present, so that is problematic.

I am going to persevere with fixing any tilt, collimation and backfocus issues as I am learning a lot by doing that.  If the mirror is actually pinched, then that will be the last thing I fix even if I have to take a hammer and chisel to it ;)
Well written Respectful Engaging
Andy Wray avatar
andrea tasselli:
You have the usual triangular shape (that pimary cell stuck still there, isn't it?) plus miscollimation so that the "good" portion is the far upper right corner. Now you need to move the "good" portion toward the centre of the image in terms of collimation, something you can do with the imaging train in place.

Thanks Andrea, that was really constructive and has helped a lot.  Last night was one of those drag the rig outside at the last minute jobs and I didn't check that everything was tight and didn't collimate properly after I had done it .... I will learn eventually.  I've re-done the collimation today and, although it's totally cloudy tonight, the stars do look more round across the frame.  Looking for clear skies to confirm.

One thing I will say is that I'm glad my wife gave me this 8" Newtonian as a present.  It is really versatile and, although I haven't dialed in the stars properly yet, they are much tighter and less fuzzy than a lot of refractor images I see on here.
Respectful Engaging Supportive
kuechlew avatar
Andy Wray:
How about sending it in to the manufacturer - or maybe your vendor knows a good repair facility? Seems to me like you won't resolve your issues without addressing this topic.

Good luck and clear skies
Wolfgang

Thanks Wolgang and I do tend to agree with you.  Unfortunately the OTA only cost about £350 new in the first place, so the cost of having it fixed would probably outweigh that.  I should probably replace it with a higher quality OTA, however my wife gave it to me as a birthday present, so that is problematic.

I am going to persevere with fixing any tilt, collimation and backfocus issues as I am learning a lot by doing that.  If the mirror is actually pinched, then that will be the last thing I fix even if I have to take a hammer and chisel to it ;)

The price of the OTA and the value of the OTA are two different things. The fact that it's a present of your wife increases its value to an extent that sending it in for repair is worth the money in my humble opinion. Just my two cents.

Clear skies
Wolfgang
Well written Respectful Supportive
Gamaholjad avatar
Looks like a tilt problem. Worth checking to elimate from possiable causes.
Dan Watt avatar
Andy Wray:
Dan Watt:
This looks a lot like pinched optics to me. How tight are your mirror clips?

Long story which a lot of people on here are fed up of hearing about ..... try as I might I have been unable to remove my primary despite loads of suggestions from people on here .... totally stuck .... and yes, I have tried very hard more than 10 times now to remove it.

Ah. Well if you want to fix it than it's time for try #11. A mallet and a drift (or at least flathead screwdriver wrapped in tape) can do wonders. A scratched up tube is better than sub-par stars.
Jacob Heppell avatar
Andy Wray:
Dan Watt:
This looks a lot like pinched optics to me. How tight are your mirror clips?

Long story which a lot of people on here are fed up of hearing about ..... try as I might I have been unable to remove my primary despite loads of suggestions from people on here .... totally stuck .... and yes, I have tried very hard more than 10 times now to remove it.

How is the primary mirror attached to the cell in order to make it so stuck? (just curious!) Was it silicone-glued to the cell? On my 250 Quattro, the primary just sits on top of cork pads. 
Looking at your image, my diagnosis is pinched optics and tilt. Non-threaded connections are a bit culprit for tilt (I can personally testify). I've also seen pinched optics resulting from using compression rings on the SW CC and from glued primaries.
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Andy Wray avatar
OK, I've done the following:

* re-collimated the OTA including trying out an autocollimator for the first time briefly … boy is that sensitive!  I was a bit late in the day and the light wasn't that good, so not sure I made the most of it.
* re-calibrated PHD2 from start to end.
* tightened up stuff to try and make sure tilt was minimised.

So, I'm imaging at the moment and guiding RMS is varying between 0.47 and 0.52 arc secs.  That said:  RA is about 40% worse than DEC so I am expecting oval stars.

I will post my image below once I have about 20 Ha frames to see if there is any improvement.
Helpful Engaging
kuechlew avatar
Andy Wray:
...

So, I'm imaging at the moment and guiding RMS is varying between 0.47 and 0.52 arc secs.  That said:  RA is about 40% worse than DEC so I am expecting oval stars.

....

I see this kind of statement time and time again. However, I don't believe you get tracking induced oval stars as long as you stay below your imaging scale with the RMS. Or is this a misconception of mine?

Clear skies
Wolfgang
Andy Wray avatar
I see this kind of statement time and time again. However, I don't believe you get tracking induced oval stars as long as you stay below your imaging scale with the RMS. Or is this a misconception of mine?


I guess if the tracking RMS was way below your image scale, then it would be difficult to see, but when the RMS values are close to your imaging scale like mine are then it will be noticeable.  Let's see what my stars look like.
Andy Wray avatar
Here's my latest result ... not perfect, but tilt almost gone so that I can start working on other stuff.  Personally I think it may be 60% my lack of collimation skills, 20% guiding issues and 20% pinched optics  or maybe I am just expecting too much from a £380 OTA?  Thoughts?


and here's a close-up:


and here's the ASTAP tilt view:
andrea tasselli avatar
Not sure it is going to get much better than this until you get the three-foil aberration tamed.
Andy Wray avatar
andrea tasselli:
Not sure it is going to get much better than this until you get the three-foil aberration tamed.

and I guess you mean by that that I need to get that mirror cell out and get rid of the pinch?  To be honest, I can see the pinch just by looking at the mirror really carefully .... it is so frustrating that Skywatcher fixed it in there so tightly.  I will give it one more go with hammers, chissels or whatever it takes to get that mirror cell out, however I shouldn't need to.

FWIW:  I've really appreciated your help and actually feel quite comfortable with the whole collimation process now thanks to you and feel happy that my OTA is quite well aligned now.
Related discussions
Backfocus on T2 to Canon EF adapter - backfocus or other problem?
Hi there, during the last two weeks I put together a mobile rig to work with some students from my wifes school. This setup should be used to explain the basic steps of doing astro photography and hopefully attract some young people for the beauty of...
Backfocus issues directly mentioned as potential cause of poor star quality.
Aug 13, 2024
Troubleshooting Guiding Issues with ASIAIR Plus
The past 2 imaging nights I've had issues with guiding. I've noticed the guiding graph has been unusually whacky and it's causing blur and/or double stars. I always aim to get my total polar alignment error near 30" and normally, my ...
Guiding problems explicitly listed as one of author's troubleshooting concerns.
Jun 5, 2024