New first ever mount

DSO & under 2k $ range ?  I never had one, but my astro friends are happy with the EQ-6

In fact this is the mount i decided on, but i wasn't sure if it will be good enough, i won't buy so many scopes to use with it, and i think with the 2 scopes i am looking for in near future i hope this mount can handle each enough, but anything else or this mount is sufficient with some scopes that are not that much heavy?

Steve Milne:
I think the advice is sound - mount, mount, mount.  As to your question about the EQ6, it depends.  Think about imaging resolution.  I have two rigs.  One is a widefield rig, where my scope and camera combine to give me an imaging resolution of 3.2" per pixel.  The EQ6 would be perfectly fine with that since I would expect to be able to guide it with an accuracy of +/- 1".  That is why the EQ6 is such a popular mount for widefield imaging.  On my other rig the camera and scope (840mm) focal length mean that my imaging resolution is 0.9" per pixel.  Now I want a mount that can guide with an accuracy of 0.4-0.5".  That might be asking a bit much of the EQ6 (although no doubt others will tell you that their EQ6 is capable of this).If you are starting out in AP then I would recommend widefield imaging and so the EQ6 should be more than fine.  People image successfully with lesser mounts.

I would recommend though that you look at the new model EQ6-R.  It is belt driven which should improve accuracy and it can carry a bit more payload than the older model.

The problem will be where i can get that EQ6-R with international shipping, because from most online stores they don't ship to my country, and i think i didn't see anywhere about EQ6-R, but i will give it a try.

Sounds for starter with 2 scopes i am looking for or even DSLR this EQ6 whatever version is just fine, i really can't imagine which heavy scope i may get to need something more than EQ6, but i think i won't go that far yet not in 2 years i hope, but who knows what i may get within 1 year once i get the mount.

I hope i can find videos about setup this mount, because it is a very first for me to use a mount for AP or astronomy in general, so i don't want to screw up the mount due to first time, and i am really worry about the weight and load i may face, but sooner or later i must learn it and put it in use.

The only problem i should worry after i get all the tools needed is to have a clear sky, because i never go so far for darker skies, and i live in a city so light pollution will definitely have a big impact, but i don't know how much light pollution is too much or which can be handled or solved by some tools, it will be a big waste for me to buy a mount and scopes to do AP or even observing for nothing much, moon is crisp clear but stars or planets i can barely see more than 10 bright ones from my backyard.

In all cases, whether it is EQ6 or EQ6-R i hope to find a store which allow or have international overseas shipping, but also i hope to find a store that has a good price for the item itself and then the shipping price, because it is ranging between $1600-2100 as total cost if shipping available, so hope to find it soon.

I mentioned EQ6 which i believe it is equatorial mount, and from what i read or i think it is slight better than AVX, so if AVX is just doing the job fine then EQ6 is going to make it even easier, but i shouldn't put higher expectations on whatever mount i will get.

I can't wait, next month i will save the money to get the mount, but still until now i couldn't find the right store to buy from, and now i focus more on EQ6-R though, hope to find something soon.

I have a variant of the EQ6, the Orion Atlas.  If I were buying today, I would get the EQ6-R or the Orion Atlas Pro.  Both are belt drive vs the gear drive of the EQ6 and the altitude adjustment is better on both than the old EQ6.  I think the Atlas Pro has the best altitude adjustment capability of all these mounts.  It doesn't use the front to back wedge with adjustment bolts that has been a long term weakness of the EQ6.

http://www.telescope.com/Mounts-Tripods/Altazimuth-Mounts-Tripods/Orion-Atlas-Pro-AZEQ-G-Computerized-GoTo-Telescope-Mount/c/2/sc/35/p/102340.uts
 FWIW.

If i add Celestron CGEM II mount, how do you compare it to EQ6-R and Orion Atlas Pro? it is CGEM II, not CGE Pro or CGX, this CGEM II i found for about $1600, Orion Atlas Pro i said is very expensive out of range for me, so now it is only EQ6-R if i can find or this CGEM II or something else in same budget range [$1400-1600].

First mount is a bit of a conundrum.  It's usually your biggest expense when you are least sure if you will stay in the hobby.  Yet it is the most key component you need if you decide to continue and then want to upgrade your telescope to something bigger and heavier.  I went through the same thing a few years back and wound up with the EQ6 variant and that is still not a bad choice for the money.

The EQ6 is a great choice.  Really it doesn't matter all that much which variant.  The more expensive ones are better, but better enough to justify the cost?
  That's a decision only you can make for yourself.  I'd say if the cost difference is just a theoretical concern with no real difference to you, go for the best.

Much more consequential is this.  When you're ready to move on to a scope from the DSLR, go for the 80 first, not the 120.  Wait until
you're doing good images with the 80.  Unlike the choice "which variant of the EQ6", that's a very big deal.  You want to proceed in
manageable steps, not jump too far too fast.  Many (including myself) made that big mistake.  Difficulty increases fast with the size
of the scope, it's not close to being a linear relationship.