AstroBin is the home of astrophotography - Share full resolution images, preserve acquisition details, discover equipment, discuss techniques, and learn from the community.Discover AstroBin
Rob Lyons avatar

I purchased the New Mesu Mount a few months ago and thought I'd share my thoughts here, since there isn't much information available on it yet.

Why I went with Mesu

I was building an array with five scopes, including two 8" Edge HDs, so I needed something formidable. I looked at the SkyWatcher EQ8-R, but it didn't inspire confidence. The Trident by JTW looked great, but they were unresponsive to some follow-up questions I asked, and it was rather expensive once you factored in the required accessories, pier, and shipping costs.

I finally landed on the new mount from Lucas Mesu, as it had an impressive payload capacity of 100 kg at a modest price. Spending a lot of money on something unproven was a gamble, but so is my whole project. The industrial design and "rough" finish did make me a bit hesitant, but Mesu's previous mounts have been performing well in large observatories around the world, and Lucas believes this mount is even better than those — so I was in.

📷 Mount Close Up.jpgMount Close Up.jpg

Ordering and build quality

Lucas Mesu was very easy to deal with. Despite our time zone differences, we found a rhythm for emailing back and forth. I paid a deposit and was quoted six weeks for production, which turned out to be exactly correct.

I'll link to the mount page HERE, but in a nutshell, the New Mesu Mount is an EQ mount that uses a friction drive controlled by OnStep. The beauty of this is that there's no backlash and no grease or maintenance to deal with. It weighs about 18 kg but can move up to 100 kg thanks to 40 Nm of torque from its six stepper motors. Using OnStep and cheaper motors brings the mount's cost down significantly.

It's also a bent-knee (flipless) pier design that doesn't require meridian flips. The pier is custom-built to your latitude for polar alignment. I don't run mine flipless, though — my imaging train is long and perfectly balanced, so I'm not messing with it.

📷 Mount Wide.jpgMount Wide.jpg

The mount and pier were very well packaged and arrived in great condition. Setup was straightforward — a few nuts and bolts and everything went together nicely. This mount is in a different league than my previous SkyWatcher and ZWO mounts, all of which I sold to fund this purchase.

📷 Mount Medium.jpgMount Medium.jpg

I went with mounting hardware from ADM Accessories. Adam is great to deal with, and his products are top-notch in terms of build quality. I have three scopes in tandem and two piggybacked, so it took a lot of hardware to build out. Five telescopes and all the gear weigh a lot — I'm not sure exactly how much, but it's well over 100 lbs.

📷 IMG_4266 2.jpgIMG_4266 2.jpg

One of the great things about the Mesu mount is that it offers an adapter to use 2" gym weights instead of the much pricier astronomy-specific counterweights. I purchased two adapters and had Lucas modify them to make more space, since I'm running 90 lbs of counterweight on this setup. It's a monster.

Software and setup

Using a mount that uses a 3D printer controller/motors with OnStep is nice because some of the parts and software are easy for the user to service. I accidentally fried a motor controller while testing and was able to order and install a replacement in under 24 hours for very little cost. It took a minute to get familiar with OnStep, but it's not overly complicated to use through its web interface.

Setting up the mount with NINA was annoying because of a conflict with longitude — it kept slewing in the wrong direction — but I eventually sorted that out, and it played nice after. My original plan was to run five separate instances of NINA on a PC in my observatory, and it worked for the most part. But I started getting driver conflicts from having five identical rotators, focusers, flat panels, etc. connected, which led me to miss several clear nights troubleshooting. I hate driver issues.

I've been a Mac user since I went to film school 25 years ago and don't have the patience to deal with Windows PCs and all their problems, so I ditched the PC and NINA and went back to ASIAIR. The only downside is that I can't synchronize dithering, but everything else is significantly easier. My first night with ASIAIR worked exactly as it was supposed to — seamlessly. My GoTos and guiding were great right away without messing with anything.

Guiding performance

Lucas claims the mount will guide in the 0.2" RMS ballpark, and he wasn't lying. My first couple of sessions were around 0.4" RMS, which is better than every previous mount I've used aside from PlaneWave. My third session guided at 0.25" all night with five telescopes and 90 lbs of gym counterweights — amazing.

📷 Guiding.jpgGuiding.jpg

The mount guides beautifully — perfect subs every time, except of course for the ones the secondary scopes take during dithering. I call that the dither tax. Long story short, the guiding performance is amazing. I'm sure with more tweaking, or different software with a sky model, I could push my RMS down further, but getting 0.25" RMS out of the box on an ASIAIR is a testament to Lucas' engineering. When I mentioned to Lucas that I was happy with the 0.4 RMS he seemed rather upset and wanted to see my guiding logs haha. He asked about my seeing conditions, and rightly so because they are atrocious. I am right between the ocean and the mountains in the middle of the Bortle 9 city, so seeing is absolutely the bottleneck for guiding here.

Final verdict

For the price versus performance, this mount is a tremendous value. It can move a lot of payload in an extremely accurate way, and at a very attractive price. I wasn't sure what to expect from such a new mount, especially with zero information or discussion about it online anywhere. My faith has paid off, and I'm extremely satisfied with this purchase — it's one of the best decisions I've made in my astronomy journey.

This mount lets me run five scopes on one mount in my observatory with a ton of automation to make my work a lot easier. I used to have five rigs on my roof under covers — this mount made my observatory make sense again, lol!

I can highly recommend Lucas' mount to anyone interested. It's incredibly solid and, in my opinion, a couple of steps above the nearest competition.

If you have any questions or comments, please leave me a note and I'll be happy to answer them to the best of my ability.

Clear skies!

Rob

Well written Helpful Engaging
Alex Nicholas avatar

Incredible write up, Rob.
Thanks for taking the time, and congrats on the new mount! Looks a solid beast to be sure!

0.2~0.45” RMS straight out of the box is amazing… Testament to the quality of the Mesu-Optics mounts.

Well written Respectful Supportive
Rob Lyons avatar

Alex Nicholas · Jul 20, 2026 at 06:48 AM

Incredible write up, Rob.
Thanks for taking the time, and congrats on the new mount! Looks a solid beast to be sure!

0.2~0.45” RMS straight out of the box is amazing… Testament to the quality of the Mesu-Optics mounts.

Thanks, Alex! I got the guiding down to 0.18 last night!

Tony Gondola avatar

The price point for this mount looks very reasonable considering payload and guiding results.

Well written Respectful
Craig Towell avatar

I’ve lusted after one of these for years. If I ever get permission for an obsy in our garden (unlikely) it will be the first thing on my shopping list

Tareq Abdulla avatar

I was thinking about Mesu mount in the past long time ago, and the price was almost same of this new which i consider as so expensive, but comparing to other mounts of same rated then i can think it is a reasonable price, but then i forgot about them and moved on in life and i didn’t hear from them much in years, i even didn’t know they made this new mount until i read this topic here, i can believe their new mount is a dream to have and pricing is fear, not cheap definitely but not expensive much, it is WAY more than many harmonic drives that are prices almost quarter to half of this mount and giving not even a quarter of this mount payload which is disappointing.\

I can’t say i can afford it easily now or soon, but i will keep it in my wishlist and see if this will be my choice or not, i don’t have that much setup i want to crank 50-100kg on a mount, but if i will do then i know where to look, thank you very much for your review and impression about it Rob.