AstroBin is the home of astrophotography - Share full resolution images, preserve acquisition details, discover equipment, discuss techniques, and learn from the community.Discover AstroBin

So, what happened at the SPIE Telescopes and Instrumentation Meeting this year (2026)?

19 replies539 views
John Hayes avatar

I recognize that Astrobin is dedicated to amateur imaging and astronomy but I thought that some of you might be interested in what happens at a meeting of professional astronomers. As I write this, I’m sitting in the Copenhagen airport waiting for my long flight back home from the meeting. SPIE (the Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers) holds this meeting every two years in various locations around the world. I’ve attended the meeting before, but only as an exhibitor so, this was my first time as a registered attendee. It’s pretty expensive to attend and it’s aimed at professionals so only a handful of amateurs make it to this meeting, which is why I thought that it might be interesting to some of you to learn about what goes on.

📷 image.jpegimage.jpeg[Above] Entrance to the Bella Convention Center in Copenhagen

First, the meeting was extremely well attended. I couldn’t find official numbers but there were at least three thousand attendees. The meeting ran for six full days and there were many hundreds of presentations and posters—along with a vendor exhibit that was open for nearly three days. A large number of the attendees are Ph.D. level researchers working in academia but many were also from various observatories such as ESO, Keck and governmental agencies like NASA. This is a meeting where most of the heads of the world’s largest and most significant observatories are in attendance. It is definitely a gathering of who’s who in Astronomy and space science research.

Each day starts with a “Plenary Session”, which is an hour-long talk by an expert about various subjects and these were all absolutely outstanding. One of the talks by a NASA astrobiologist covered the subject of what should we be looking for as we search for life in the universe. Another talk, again from NASA, covered the plan for Flagship programs of the future with a lot of discussion about planning for the “Habitable Worlds” mission and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope scheduled to launch next month. A talk by a Chinese scientist detailed the status and future plans for astronomy and observatories in China where they are focusing on becoming a major player in astronomical and space research.

📷 image.jpegimage.jpeg[Above] The Plenary Sessions were always packed.

The technical sessions cover every aspect of astronomy and instrumentation ranging from ultra-long radio wavelengths into X-ray research. One of the phrases that I heard numerous times is the push for full-sky, “high cadence” imaging to look for fast occurring transient events. The new Argus program funded by Eric and Wendy Schmidt is aimed at this area of research. It will be an ultra-wide field, multiple aperture array of telescopes that will use 1,200 of the 200mm, F/3 SCT telescopes recently announced by Planewave. Those telescopes were developed specifically for the Argus program. You can learn more about this program here: https://argus.unc.edu

I heard a number of talks about the Mothra system located in Chile and was able to have a number of discussions with a few of the engineers working on the project. I won’t go into the details but there are still a lot of challenges to overcome before that system is completely dialed in. They hope to commission the completed system sometime around December of this year (2026).

📷 20260705_144008.jpg20260705_144008.jpg[Above] A slide from the Mothra talk

There were even a few folks with Astrobin accounts in attendance.@Gabriel Santos (professor at the Univ de Sao Paulo) gave a great talk about how to optimize cost effectiveness of telescope arrays using commercial components.@Gaston Baudat (Innovations Foresight) presented a very well received poster paper on his wavefront sensor work. I was delighted to get to hang out with Vincent, Gaston, and Gabriel for much of the week. Vincent is a professor and one of the two owners of Obstech in Chile.

📷 image.jpegimage.jpeg[Above] From left to right, Gabrielle, John, and Vincent.

The program director for the ELT gave an informative talk about the status of that telescope and it sounds like they are holding to their schedule. Mirrors are being made and the structure is being completed. I am particularly proud that they are using PhaseCams at Safran Reosc in France to measure the optics. It is a super impressive project that appears to be extremely well managed. Other large telescope projects are moving along but many are on a much bumpier path toward completion. GMT is still struggling for money and the TMT (Thirty Meter Telescope) has been thrown into funding limbo. TMT was planned for installation on Maui; however, they lost their NSF funding needed to reach preliminary design review. Spain has jumped in with a $400M loan and now there is talk of putting it in the Canary Islands. I hope that they can pull it off but it sound very shaky at this point.

The technical papers ranged in subject matter from very esoteric research projects to very simple, completely understandable projects. One poster paper described a project to simply add an off-axis auto-guider to a meter-class telescope. The authors presented analysis with graphs and tables to show before and after imaging performance and I had to chuckle. This paper basically described what virtually everyone here does to run a deep sky imaging system! Other papers were clearly aimed at other researchers working on very specialized topics and weren’t so easy to understand without a lot more background. I personally enjoyed learning more about stellar interferometry, AO systems, and programs to image exo-planets.

📷 20260706_173357.jpg20260706_173357.jpg[Above] Gaston Baudat discussing his poster paper with an attendee.

The vendor area is always a great place to hear about new things. ASA is about to deliver their first 2.5-m scope. ZWO had a nice motorized tip-tilt unit for small sensors. Vincent Suc (Obstech) and I tried to convince them that they need a similar product for larger sensors. Sam Wen, the CEO and founder of ZWO, was there and he seems like a great guy!

The folks at Imagine Optic (a French company) were showing a new compact AO module called “Caio Vis” designed for small telescopes. It is optimized for F/9 – F12 systems but it can be adapted to faster systems with some additional optics. It has a 14x14 Shack Harman wavefront sensor and a 40x40 active mirror and it can run at rates up to 1 kHz. The entire system only weighs 3kg and it looked very well made! The guy who designed it (Guillaume Dovillaire) had a lot of videos and images that he took using his personal C9.25 in his driveway. The useable field is pretty small and the price is pretty high (~$80k) so this is only for very high-end amateur equipment or professional applications. The planetary pictures that I saw were definitely impressive. The one thing that I want to emphasize is that this is a “real AO” system using a Shack-Hartman wavefront sensor and a medium authority active mirror. The old amateur AO systems such as those from SBIG that merely corrected for tilt had nothing to do with true active-optical systems.

📷 20260707_110105.jpg20260707_110105.jpg[Above] The CIAO Vis AO product looks very nicely made and simple to mount on any telescope.

Baader Planetarium had their new, research-grade spectroscopy system for “large aperture” telescopes >0.5m) on display. Ironically, they had it connected to a CDK17. It is a very nicely designed, fiber-fed Echelle spectrometer with high spectral resolution. Again, this is a system designed for professional applications but they told me that an amateur with a CDK1000 took delivery of the first unit. Unfortunately, if you have to ask for the price, you can’t afford it.

QHY was showing off a new, extremely large (98.3 mm x 98.3 mm) Chinese made 150 Mpx, CMOS sensor with 8-micron pixels and a 14-bit ADC. The spectral response curve looks very good with a QE of nearly 90% in the visible. They don’t yet have a camera for it and the price will be north of $100,000 so it’s not a “general-interest” item, but it is nevertheless very interesting. It was certainly the largest sensor that I’ve ever seen! Unfortunately, I didn’t have the presence of mind to take a picture of it.

The folks at ATIK were showing off their new IMX455 based cameras. They appear to be built like a tank—quite large and heavy and they use only optical fiber for data transfer. Unfortunately, these cameras are pretty expensive (roughly double the price of other competitors like QHY, ZWO, or Moravian) and they currently have no software. There are no drivers or anything else! I really like the idea of optical fiber connections but I don’t believe that these cameras are aimed at the amateur market. For most of us in the amateur world, the advantages of an optical fiber connection over USB are probably not worth the additional cost.

FLI was there showing their new Aurora CMOS cameras. FLI cameras are bullet proof and I really loved the ones that I’ve owned but FLI is very late to the CMOS market with a product that carries a premium price. Furthermore, they’ve had production problems that have slowed initial deliveries. From what I learned at the show, it’s going to be a while before they solve those problems. I wish them well and I hope they succeed but they have a steep climb to get back to where they used to be and in my opinion, much of the market has moved on.

These are just a few of the highlights that I gleaned from the meeting. There is simply no way to report on all of the things that I took away from this event. It was an amazing week and it was totally worth it to attend this meeting. I loved Copenhagen and I want to go back again someday—just to be a tourist. The next SPIE Telescope meeting will be held in Montreal in 2028 and I hope to be there again.

- John

Well written Helpful Respectful Engaging
Tony Gondola avatar

I’m curious if you saw or heard anything that might at some point be relevant to the amateur community either in hardware, process or data collection?

James avatar

Thanks for the report. This is all very interesting to me.

On Argus, I’m pretty sure its using DR280’s (11 inch Delta Rho scopes), not the FSCT8.

Well written Concise
John Hayes avatar

James · Jul 13, 2026 at 03:06 AM

Thanks for the report. This is all very interesting to me.

On Argus, I’m pretty sure its using DR280’s (11 inch Delta Rho scopes), not the FSCT8.

James,

You certainly may be right; however, I was told that the SCTs are what they are using by a couple of folks. I’m merely passing along what I was told. Argus is not very far along so it’s certainly possible that both of those scopes were developed as a part of this project. The optics for the SCT are not being made by PW and the folks from the optics manufacturer were one of my sources.

- John

John Hayes avatar

Tony Gondola · Jul 13, 2026 at 01:33 AM

I’m curious if you saw or heard anything that might at some point be relevant to the amateur community either in hardware, process or data collection?

Tony,

The one photo contest at the meeting involving pretty pictures was led by Dr. Julian Drevon of ESO. It involved reducing VLTI stellar interferometry data to produce an image of an exoplanet and a very distant star cluster. Other than that, there is little to no discussion of processing the kind of data into the sort of pretty pictures that we as amateurs like to create. Mothra and ultimately Argus will use the same processing methods that we currently use but interestingly, they will roll their own code. As far as I can tell, astronomers love to reinvent the wheel when it comes to stuff like this. In my view, they could have simplified a lot of things by simply making big telescopes like the LSST at Rubin ALPACA compliant but they never do that. Instead, they write all of their own operating code for everything—and every telescope is different. The same goes for processing. Instead of using PI, they will just write all of their own custom code. Of course, in the case of LSST, that’s probably necessary; however, they do it even when they could just use existing code. I suppose that the big concern is control over the source, updates, and bug control.

The most relevant topics for amateurs were mostly in the vendor exhibits among the camera manufacturers. In spite of its price, the AO instrument that I described is a huge breakthrough. It is really the very first instrument of its type that is specifically designed for small telescopes. It is expensive now but I think that it heralds a potential new era for cheaper, less complicated AO systems for amateurs in the future.

My own interest in attending this meeting was to find out what’s going on in the bigger world of astronomy beyond simply creating pretty pictures with my own gear. The best meeting for learning more about amateur hardware, processing and data collection is probably NEAIC.

- John

Well written Engaging
James avatar

John Hayes · Jul 13, 2026, 04:03 AM

James · Jul 13, 2026 at 03:06 AM

Thanks for the report. This is all very interesting to me.

On Argus, I’m pretty sure its using DR280’s (11 inch Delta Rho scopes), not the FSCT8.

James,

You certainly may be right; however, I was told that the SCTs are what they are using by a couple of folks. I’m merely passing along what I was told. Argus is not very far along so it’s certainly possible that both of those scopes were developed as a part of this project. The optics for the SCT are not being made by PW and the folks from the optics manufacturer were one of my sources.

- John

Ah.. well that’s cool. That FSCT8 is on my radar. :)

Respectful
Michael Smithers avatar

I just really LOVE the bloke’s hair with the backpack on standing behind you John. He looks like I did 20 years ago! 🤩

John Hayes avatar

Michael Smithers · Jul 13, 2026 at 08:13 AM

I just really LOVE the bloke’s hair with the backpack on standing behind you John. He looks like I did 20 years ago! 🤩

Hahaha….yeah, there are all sorts of interesting things to spot at these meetings!

- John

Kevin Morefield avatar

John,

Thanks for this very good summary of the show. It all sounds very interesting and I’m bummed I wasn’t there! I’ll try to keep my eyes on the next one when they schedule it. True AO is a very tempting opportunity if it gets out into the amateur space. And I find the Mothra and Argus projects fascinating.

Thanks again!

Kevin

Well written Respectful Supportive
John Hayes avatar

Thanks Kevin. I’m glad you enjoyed it and I’d love to see you at the next meeting!

John

Well written Respectful Supportive
Dan Kearl avatar

Tony Gondola · Jul 13, 2026 at 01:33 AM

I’m curious if you saw or heard anything that might at some point be relevant to the amateur community either in hardware, process or data collection?

The last 3 paragraphs were about new camera’s for amateur photographers. You should read the post.

Tony Gondola avatar

Dan Kearl · Jul 14, 2026, 12:07 AM

Tony Gondola · Jul 13, 2026 at 01:33 AM

I’m curious if you saw or heard anything that might at some point be relevant to the amateur community either in hardware, process or data collection?

The last 3 paragraphs were about new camera’s for amateur photographers. You should read the post.

Not sure what your problem is Dan but I’ll be polite. The items mentioned really didn’t sound like anything that was headed to the amateur market anytime soon. In any case, I was really asking if John had heard to seen anything that wasn’t in the write up. A lot of interesting conversations can come up at events like these.

John Hayes avatar

I did notice one additional interesting thing at the meeting related to amateur astronomy. As I said, most of the attendees were professional astronomers in some capacity and yet whenever I walked by the ZWO booth, it was packed! A lot of the interest appeared to be directed toward the Seastar Telescopes that they had on display. So, it seems that even among the professionals at this meeting, there appeared to be a lot of interest in amateur imaging!

John

Well written Respectful Concise Engaging
Tony Gondola avatar

That’s great to hear. I used to run into professionals from time to time during star parties and they were always very enthusiastic. I remember one man telling me that it was great to reconnect with what got him started on his professional journey so long ago.

Well written Respectful Engaging Supportive
Charles Bracken avatar

Thank you so much for sharing this write-up, John! We appreciate you being our intrepid reporter from the amateur community. :)

My heart skipped a beat at “1,200 of the 200mm, F/3 SCT telescopes recently announced by Planewave.” That’s exactly the sort of thing I’d do if I won the lottery, so I’m thrilled to see that Schmidt is doing this with a small fraction of his money. We’re going to need pictures once it’s constructed.

And real AO for amateur-sized scopes? Wait until the planetary imagers get their hands on this.

It’s great to see the progress at the leading edge of our hobby!

Well written Respectful Engaging Supportive
Josh Walawender avatar

Hi John,

Thanks for the great writeup. I saw you there, but didn’t get the chance to say hi through the crowds.

I also noted the AO system you mentioned and spoke with them a few times. If I had the money, I’d buy it in a heartbeat. Even if it was useable on only one or two targets like Mars and Trapezium, it would be amazing to do visual observing with an effective AO system — a real dream come true.

I’ll also mention two presentations which I found very interesting from the amateur perspective.

First, there was a talk titled “On sky results for a solution for time domain follow-up in urban/suburban environments: light pollution minimization by use of new inexpensive NIR CMOS detectors” by Laird Close from Steward Observatory. The premise was simply that with the change in lighting from HPS, LPS, and incandescent lighting to LED in recent decades, we’ve seen an increase in sky glow which has been well documented. One of the problems with LED technology is that it emits a lot of blue light which scatters well increasing the sky brightness more than longer wavelengths do (hence the push for more amber LEDs). The interesting point he brought up, which I had not considered before, is that old lighting (HPS, LPS, and incandescent) all all emit light in “near-IR” (the wavelengths just past our photopic and scotopic vision, but below ~1000 nm), but LEDs are relatively dark there. His hypothesis is that the I-band sky should be darker than it used to be which opens up depth/sensitivity at that wavelength despite light pollution. He demonstrated this by using a low cost ZWO camera (I didn’t write down the model, but I think it was an IMX676 or IMX477 based one) and a fisheye lens to take images of the Milky Way from Tucson and showing that the I-band sky is a factor of 5-10x dimmer than shorter bandpasses. His argument is that this opens up much fainter transient events to a large number of amateur telescopes if the follow up is in I-band where CMOS sensors are sensitive and the sky is dark even in light polluted skies.

Second was a software poster about a telescope control system called Astra. I used to work in the small robotic telescopes world and while I’m now doing other things, I like to see what the state of that world is when I go to conferences like this. When I was in it (15-20 years ago), it felt like it was dominated by a bunch of small scrappy projects trying to experiment and do science one or two small telescopes, but now there are a lot of mega projects like Argus and even the “small” projects have a dozen or more telescopes working in a system with teams of people supporting them. That said, I did find this poster by a small team running 2-3 modest observatories with python code designed to interface with hardware using Alpaca. Now that I’m back home, I’m hoping to spin it up in simulation mode and see how it works. I’m in the final stages of my backyard observatory build, so this could be my control system if it pans out. The software is called Astra: https://docs.withastra.io. Likely this isn’t for someone who wants a turn key system, but I’m excited to potentially have something which I can customize have fun digging in to.

-Josh

Well written Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Tony Gondola avatar

Josh Walawender · Jul 15, 2026, 07:47 AM

“On sky results for a solution for time domain follow-up in urban environments: light pollution minimization by use of new inexpensive NIR CMOS detectors”

This is exactly right. It’s the reason I will often use an IR pass filter to create L frames for broadband objects. It’s a very effective technique under high LP.

Well written Concise Supportive
John Hayes avatar

Josh Walawender · Jul 15, 2026 at 07:47 AM

Hi John,

Thanks for the great writeup. I saw you there, but didn’t get the chance to say hi through the crowds.

I also noted the AO system you mentioned and spoke with them a few times. If I had the money, I’d buy it in a heartbeat. Even if it was useable on only one or two targets like Mars and Trapezium, it would be amazing to do visual observing with an effective AO system — a real dream come true.

I’ll also mention two presentations which I found very interesting from the amateur perspective.

First, there was a talk titled “On sky results for a solution for time domain follow-up in urban/suburban environments: light pollution minimization by use of new inexpensive NIR CMOS detectors” by Laird Close from Steward Observatory. The premise was simply that with the change in lighting from HPS, LPS, and incandescent lighting to LED in recent decades, we’ve seen an increase in sky glow which has been well documented. One of the problems with LED technology is that it emits a lot of blue light which scatters well increasing the sky brightness more than longer wavelengths do (hence the push for more amber LEDs). The interesting point he brought up, which I had not considered before, is that old lighting (HPS, LPS, and incandescent) all all emit light in “near-IR” (the wavelengths just past our photopic and scotopic vision, but below ~1000 nm), but LEDs are relatively dark there. His hypothesis is that the I-band sky should be darker than it used to be which opens up depth/sensitivity at that wavelength despite light pollution. He demonstrated this by using a low cost ZWO camera (I didn’t write down the model, but I think it was an IMX676 or IMX477 based one) and a fisheye lens to take images of the Milky Way from Tucson and showing that the I-band sky is a factor of 5-10x dimmer than shorter bandpasses. His argument is that this opens up much fainter transient events to a large number of amateur telescopes if the follow up is in I-band where CMOS sensors are sensitive and the sky is dark even in light polluted skies.

Second was a software poster about a telescope control system called Astra. I used to work in the small robotic telescopes world and while I’m now doing other things, I like to see what the state of that world is when I go to conferences like this. When I was in it (15-20 years ago), it felt like it was dominated by a bunch of small scrappy projects trying to experiment and do science one or two small telescopes, but now there are a lot of mega projects like Argus and even the “small” projects have a dozen or more telescopes working in a system with teams of people supporting them. That said, I did find this poster by a small team running 2-3 modest observatories with python code designed to interface with hardware using Alpaca. Now that I’m back home, I’m hoping to spin it up in simulation mode and see how it works. I’m in the final stages of my backyard observatory build, so this could be my control system if it pans out. The software is called Astra: https://docs.withastra.io. Likely this isn’t for someone who wants a turn key system, but I’m excited to potentially have something which I can customize have fun digging in to.

-Josh

Thanks for your report Josh! I’m sorry that we didn’t meet but at times, it was indeed really crowded. I think that we need to figure out how to have an amateur gathering at the next meeting—even if it is an informal get together. SPIE might even be willing to give us an announcement and a place to meet. On my flight home, I sat next to one of the meeting organizers from SPIE and they are eager for suggestions to make the meetings better so I’ll have to look into that idea.

John

Well written Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive
SJK avatar

Thank you so much for the report.

You might have been busy with more important things and with so many exhibitors, but did you hear any whisper from these guys ?

They are specializing in ultra compact monolithic SCTs.

https://spie.org/astronomical-telescopes-instrumentation/presentation/Monolith-tiny-telescope-optics-mechanism-for-earth-observation/14154-12

It looks interesting mid-term for the amateurs Smartscope world once it gets to industrial production levels.

136671C.pdf

https://youtu.be/OWfiQys4NMs?is=1WYRUCZwerGTUHtf

John Hayes avatar

SJK · Jul 15, 2026 at 04:53 PM

Thank you so much for the report.

You might have been busy with more important things and with so many exhibitors, but did you hear any whisper from these guys ?

They are specializing in ultra compact monolithic SCTs.

https://spie.org/astronomical-telescopes-instrumentation/presentation/Monolith-tiny-telescope-optics-mechanism-for-earth-observation/14154-12

It looks interesting mid-term for the amateurs Smartscope world once it gets to industrial production levels.

136671C.pdf

https://youtu.be/OWfiQys4NMs?is=1WYRUCZwerGTUHtf

That’s a cool little telescope and I recall having seen something about it a while back. It reminds me of a two mirror component that I have banging around in a box of miscellaneous optics in my shop somewhere. Mine isn’t monolithic but it looks very similar. Unfortunately, I can’t remember where it came from. I personally didn’t see any papers at the meeting about it but that’s not to say that there weren’t any.

- John