I have a budget that can be assigned to another bigger scope or to an Asi533mc pro.
Case for bigger scope : I can’t get details on jupiter, such as festoons with my 250pds,mounted on AZEQ6, camera Asi662mc, uv/ir cut filter, 2.25x Baader Barlow, 15000 frames, 10-15% stacked in autostakkert, wavelets in Registax. Jupiter > 40° altitude. Despite being sure the GRS was well focused. Only option left is to focus on a nearby moon, and try again. I’ve not seen many if any good images taken with the 250pds,but have with 12” F5.3. This is too heavy for me though. Other options, orion optics VX12 or VX12 L. C11 has lots of good images.
BUT, I’d like your opinion on whether i’m hitting issues with atmospheric issues here, in which case a larger aperture won't help. Perhaps an adc, but not sure, as I csn’t see any hint of festoons at all. Surely, the 250pds should be capable of showing the festoons.
Case for better astro camera: the Asi662 mc is too small. My D7000 is larger sensor, but not nodded. Asi533 mc pro looks a very good balance, and is next big step up. I have an asiair plus, several scopes.
So, which is the wisest choice for capital expenditure? Getting an even bigger scope, with risk that i’ll find it's no better if it's atmospheric conditions causing the issues or going for the Asi533 pro, virtually guaranteed to give better images for dso?
Thanks in advance
Mark