Guiding aggressiveness setup.

Guiding Help Needed
2 replies•22 views
Eric Gagne avatar
Eric Gagne avatar

This looks like pretty good guiding to me but I never really understood how to read the vertical lines in the chart. I understand it shows the corrections but how should it be interpreted ? Is it correcting too much, not enough ? Should I change the settings or be happy with sub 0.50” total error with an EQM-35 Pro mount and touch nothing ?

📷 IMG_0255.pngIMG_0255.png📷 IMG_0256.pngIMG_0256.png

Well Written Respectful Engaging
Tony Gondola avatar
Tony Gondola avatar

You should be happy with 0.5” RMS…

Tobiasz avatar
Tobiasz avatar

If your stars are round, don't touch it.

Related discussions
Fornax LighTrack II setup advice
Hello all, I bought a Fornax LighTrack II used for about 370€. It's just the tracking arm so that gave me room to improvise how I would like to have my rig set up and I've come to this final configuration. However, I am very open to any suggestions. ...
Reviews real-world guiding metrics for different mounts; directly comparable.
Jan 10, 2026
CEM120EC real-world review with actual guiding metrics
CEM120EC — Real-World Review (With Actual Guiding Metrics) I realised something: there is almost no modern, accurate, real-world information on the CEM120EC. Most people only post when something breaks. So let’s correct the record because this mount ...
Provides actual guiding metrics data; directly addresses interpretation questions.
Dec 7, 2025