donld · Jul 13, 2026, 01:41 AM
The first building could easily be $50K. Most are staffed most nights when the roof is open. One very bad event and the company’s reputation is ruined.
IF - the building isn’t a tax write off for their parent company who builds and sells telescopes, piers and observatories, then yes, the cost of the building would probably need to be recouped via rental fees…
Also worth noting, that, lets say the building costs you 50K.
You rent 10 piers at $500 a month, the cost of the building itself is recovered in 10 months… Yes, less cost of operation, however, you make that 20 piers rented at $500/m, and the site has broken a profit in 12 months without a doubt…
I don’t think remote observatory operations need to be anywhere near the cost that they are per month. I think, however, that this hobby is one where people will pay ridiculous money for results… Look at the number of users of the Tak FSQ106, or the Tak TOA130/150 as a single scope investment… Now, just because MOST remote observatory operators capitalise on this fact, and charge 3x what it actually costs to host a scope (once the inital building setup is paid for) does not mean that every operator is of the same mindset, or that they are paying the same cost for land/observatory buildings etc… Remember, This company is run by a company that builds and sells observatories…. Do you think they paid market rates? Do you think they didn’t claim the cost of building the observatory structure/s as a tax debduction? I hardly think so…
I do not believe this particular site is manned every night… I could be wrong on this, but the information I have is that there is someone there once a week most weeks.
And again, if the people there are doing it for the love of astronomy, and they have a day job when they aren’t out at the site - then they may even be doing it as a volunteer or as a trade for having a scope or two on site..