AP is somewhat challenging in Florida. Acquisition time is precious when you live 2.5 hours from the nearest Bortle 4 site, in a state with 95% cloudy nights in the summer. In the winter, heavy dew and fog after midnight are big issues. (I’ve actually had a towel become too wet to use because I left it on a picnic table for two hours after sunset. Most mornings my rig looks like it was rained on.)
I’m thinking about 3 strategies for addressing this
Sending a scope out to a remote hosting site - If so, which one? My wife isn’t nice enough to pay for having multiple scopes hosted 🤣. I was going to send an SCT out there but after some discussion with a guy at the Chiefland Astronomy Village, am thinking that my 360mm refractor might be more appropriate. There is the Newt, but I’m not sure how well Starfront would take care of the collimation and what’s the point of sending your fastest telescope out to a place where acquisition time is much less of an issue?
Increasing reliance on fast Newts. In particular, my 6” F/4 Newt is amazingly fast when I slap my Nexus focal reducer on it and take it down to F/2.8. The problem here is that it seems a lot harder to keep dew off the optics than in the case of my refractors. And I had to cut my dew shield to half-length to prevent vignetting at F/2.8. I know there are some kits out there for applying a silicon heating element directly to the back of the mirrors, but somehow this just sounds like a bad idea. A second Newt would be reasonably affordable and I have several capable mounts.
Running two imaging setups with identical refractor OTAs and cameras in parallel and combining data - This will be rather expensive
I have a little bit of a budget for addressing these issues, though the third approach would be a stretch.
Thoughts appreciated, especially from those who have dealt with these issues.
