Crescent Nebula raw data available for processing - 21 hours collected

4 replies150 views
Fabian Butkovich avatar

Hello all,

The time has come again to offer up some of my raw image data for anyone to process if you’re up for it, specifically my 2025 acquisition of the Crescent Nebula in Cygnus. I captured this in a relatively narrow FOV with my Celestron C6 scope + 0.63X reducer. I have about 25 hours of data collected on it but my final integrated stack out of PixInsight WBPP module is 21hours, in Bortle 8. I imaged this object entirely with a OSC through an Optolong L-eNhance dual-narrowband filter.

📷 NGC 6888 (Crescent Nebula) 2025NGC 6888 (Crescent Nebula) 2025

https://app.astrobin.com/i/h788ec/

For my own processing I decided to try an do an HOO composition or treatment, of which was the first time ever I have done so. I did manage to extract quote a bit of the Oxygen and make it stand out quite a bit, but still not very happy with it, mainly the color hue, is still too close to green or cyan and not purely “blue”. I attempted to correct this with selective masking in Photoshop before bringing back into PI and it worked some, but also seemed to decrease the luminosity of the blue at the same time.

Moreover, I also want to see other processed versions of this because when I look at other astrographs of this DSO, I just am not pleased with my own version. I am striving in 2026 to get better about my image processing. Perhaps it’s because I tend to be a bit aggressive on the vibrance/color treatment, or I am bad at managing the sky background levels, or overstretching, but my images always end up looking too “fake”. So I would love to learn some tips and advice for how I can improve and also what should I expect. Ultimately in the end I remember that to some point image processing is artistry, and that no two images processed by different individuals will ever look the same even given the same base data.

Attached is all the raw image data, calibration frames etc. as well as an already integrated master light frame.

Crescent Nebula 2025

I have also included the PI project so you can see my workflow.

Happy processing and good luck! I am eager to see what can come out of this.

Helpful Engaging Supportive
andrea tasselli avatar
Fabian Butkovich:
I did manage to extract quote a bit of the Oxygen and make it stand out quite a bit, but still not very happy with it, mainly the color hue, is still too close to green or cyan and not purely “blue”


OIII is NOT meant to be "blue" but rather close to cyan instead so you got that right.
Jan Erik Vallestad avatar

Andrea is exactly right. The oxygen is more greenish than blue as can be seen from the chart below, and the fact that Oiii peaks at around 496-500nm or thereabout.

Basic Information of The Visible Light - AGC Lighting

Cédric PASTOR avatar

Hi Fabian!

Thanks for sharing your data, I’m really glad I got the chance to work on this target since I’ve never imaged it myself.
I started from your raw frames and here’s the result of my interpretation.
I’m definitely not an expert, but I tried to keep a natural look while bringing out the OIII a bit more, and keeping the Ha a bit more restrained for balance.
My workflow is a bit messy and I didn’t write down everything, but if you have any questions feel free to ask and I’ll gladly answer.

Great job on the acquisition, especially under Bortle 8!

📷 NGC6888.pngNGC6888.png

Well Written Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive
Fabian Butkovich avatar

@Cédric PASTOR amazing edit of yours! I am quite surprised to see how much of the Oxygen shell you were able to reveal, it stands out alot more than in my version. I assume you did a weighted combination of the OIII and Ha channels in PI PixelMath? Also, did you stretch the background to a different amount than the nebula itself? Perhaps that why in my version the blue doesn’t really stand out much because the background and nebula are all just red.

Respectful Engaging Supportive