John Nedelcu · Jan 2, 2026, 06:54 PM
I struggled to do this for ages with different techniques like continuum subtraction, but my last image (IC405) worked like a charm by following the guide from Dark Sky Geek.
At least, it’s miles better than anything I have been able to produce so far. There is a bit of fiddling with the numbers, but after getting it dialled in, it worked.
If you’re interested in trying, these two videos explain the workflow:
This is a good tutorial. This is not continuum subtraction, but rather a separate step in processing OSC data. It’s effectively the same thing I talked about in the first part of my comment.
Mikołaj Wadowski · Jan 2, 2026, 06:19 PM
The first two steps should be gradient extraction from both stacks and extracting Oiii from the narrowband stack. Due to how bayer matrix works, it lets quite a significant amount of Ha through the G and B filters, so your initial “Oiii” isn’t pure. I explained how to do it in my emissionless processing tutorial (step 1, you can ignore the rest). Whether you extract the gradient before or after Oiii doesn’t really matter, but I like to do it before.
The only difference is I don’t use any sensor characteristics as a baseline for the factor, since in my experience I would have to play around with them quite a bit anyway
John Nedelcu · Jan 2, 2026, 06:56 PM
I found the opposite for me. Granted, I’m not very good at CS, and all the guides I’ve seen don’t work with my data at all.
With OSC cameras it can sometimes be tricky. Especially if you don’t CFA drizzle - debayering does not preserve photometry, so it may not work properly, especially if you’re using automated scripts like PSC for continuum subtraction.
Either way, given a set of broadband and narrowband masters, it’s always possible to perform continuum subtraction. If you don’t you end up with results like these:
To be clear, in my opinion these are all good images, but display a pretty glaring technical error.