Hi Louis,
From what others have said, It looks like the AM5 will be a great match with either scope. I have the AM5 with the carbon fibre tripod and love it. That’s with a 102mm refractor and full mono imaging train.
You’ll definitely need the pier extension. The PE200 has a higher weight rating than the one with three columns. I also hang a 5 kg dumbbell off the central knob underneath so it partly sits on the ground, for more stability. I also have the scope sitting on risers off the plate for added clearance as the EAF would sometimes still clip the tripod and rotate the camera. With the scope now further from the centre, I’ve felt more comfortable with a counterweight. All well within the limits of the mount.
I think a weighted base will do just as well for you as a counterweight but that’s something you can test by extending the scope and giving it a nudge. Would you be happy with the stability it shows if a gust of wind came along?
Where I’m living now is quite windy so at home I try to shelter the scope with outdoor furniture on the balcony or my car parked beside the scope in the driveway.
I feel the weakest link in these setups is the tripod, not the mount. In the last week, I’ve upgraded the tripod to something high end which is a beast but not as easily managed. With the Zwo tripod, I could flick the image train and it would vibrate like a guitar string. With the new tripod, it doesn’t budge at all.
That might be something to consider down the track. The standard setup has served me very well for a few years as it should for you.