My littte bad weather project: Sharpstar 13028HNT modification

5 replies194 views
Armin Lukas avatar

Due to bad weather in Germany, I wanted to do some modifications to my Sharpstar 13028HNT. I’d like to share my first experiences with these modifications, though there is still more to do.

A few things I wanted to try:

  • Create a new mirror mask (notches in the mirrormask worsen the star shape)

  • Eliminate internal reflections (only just started here, more to come)

  • Experiment with star shapes featuring 6 spikes (new secondary spider)

First, I 3D-printed a mirror mask:

  • No notches and 1 mm smaller diameter (to be safe)

  • I added velour tape on it

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

The initial result looked good: the star shape improved. But I wanted something more stable, so I decided to have it CNC-machined.

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

I am satisfied with the first test (comparison phots below). The material quality is fine!

The next step was blackening the surface beneath the primary mirror. Not all of it was black-painted in the original manufacturing.

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

No gluing needed: The Velour holds by itself, locked in with the screws (and can be easily removed).

Finally, a real challenge (one of my first 3D-designed models): the secondary spider with three struts.

A 6-spike star shape is not very common in amateur telescopes, so I was very curious to see it on my own telescope. The secondary spider was designed with FreeCAD.

Again, I printed a 3D prototype to get a good fit. After that, the CNC machining was completed.

CNC machined spider:

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

Comparison to the original spider:

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

The attached spider on my carbon 13028HNT:

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

(Btw, this was done by a manufacturer where you can have CNC parts and more made.)

Again, the build quality looks good to me. With no other modifications, I mounted it on the tube, performed collimation (works very well with OCAL). The collimation is very precise and easily done.

And finally, the first light! I was very excited and had waited a few weeks for this day. A quick test to see the performance on brighter and dimmer stars. But look for yourself. Don’t mind the strong crop; it was a quick test with no flats and a very short integration time.

M45:

41×60 seconds

Sony A7 III, ISO 640

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

NGC 1333:

25×90 seconds

Sony A7 III, ISO 640

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

Here is a comparison between the modifications:

upper left: before any modificiation (Didn’t use the Astronomik UV/IR Filter, probably the reason for stronger halo)

upper right: my new mirror mask

below: new mirror mask + new secondary spider

📷 grafik.pnggrafik.png

So far so good! I think I need to add some velour tape to the spider as well, since reflections occur on very bright stars. The tube is already flocked.

I’m happy to answer questions :)

CS

Armin

Helpful Engaging
Tony Gondola avatar

It looks like the new mirror mask made the biggest difference. I’m not sold on the three vane spider though. On paper there are benefits but in practice it might not be.

Armin Lukas avatar

Tony Gondola · Dec 12, 2025 at 10:39 PM

It looks like the new mirror mask made the biggest difference. I’m not sold on the three vane spider though. On paper there are benefits but in practice it might not be.

Yes that’s right, I think it’s more about the looks then any other advantage (if there is any).

John Stone avatar
Can you point us to the place you had the CNC machining done?

Also, have you considered a 3-veined (or even 2-veined) curved spider?

Lastly, why do you think the original spider didn't have strong halos like your spider does?   Is it made of different material or have a different surface finish?  If it's the finish, do you think adding knurling to the spider veins would make a difference?

Thanks.
Well Written Engaging
Armin Lukas avatar

John Stone · Dec 15, 2025, 12:12 AM

Can you point us to the place you had the CNC machining done?

Also, have you considered a 3-veined (or even 2-veined) curved spider?

Lastly, why do you think the original spider didn't have strong halos like your spider does?   Is it made of different material or have a different surface finish?  If it's the finish, do you think adding knurling to the spider veins would make a difference?

Thanks.

Sure. The machining was done by JLCCNC.

Yes, I was thinking about that, but I don’t think the curved spider will improve the star shape. The other thing is it need to be stable, to insure collimation stability. This gets more important with faster focal ratio.

But this can be easily tested with 3D printed parts. I am happy to test some ideas!

Regarding the halo I think it is, because prior I didn’t use the Astronomik L Filter (might help with the halos because of the coating).

andrea tasselli avatar
Armin Lukas:
Yes, I was thinking about that, but I don’t think the curved spider will improve the star shape. The other thing is it need to be stable, to insure collimation stability. This gets more important with faster focal ratio.


*The spider's diffraction spikes will disappear, that what is meant to achieve with  a curved arms spider.