Pink splotches in my images

22 replies372 views
IronMarcoPolo avatar

Hi all. Brand new to Astrobin and excited to share images and plug into a community. I have been doing astrophotography for about 2 years, 1 year on an S50 and now 1 year on my “big kid” set up. So still very much a beginner.

I am still young in the journey with a simplified workflow using graxpert, siril, and gimp. Not looking to get into pixinsight yet but considering swapping to seti astro. My equipment is linked to the image on my page.

My problem: On some bright targets, I get these pink splotches. starless_NGC7635-585mc414mm360s-10.11.25_recomp1.jpg Attached is my most recent example. They are located on and to the right of the bubble nebula. I am assuming they are a type of saturation/over exposure artifact. I also have some presumed green saturation artifact in the bubble nebula as well. However, I couldn’t fix them with lower exposure times nor reduced gain settings. I also tried different stretching, but they persist. For this image, they were in my star image (when I separated into nebula and stars with star net). I tried both my 2600mc duo and my 585mc pro. They are always in the exact same location.

Any thoughts or tips on what they are and how to correct?Not opposed to other reasonable feedback.

Thanks ahead of time!

Here are two other examples: M42 - DSS SUPER- 2.17.25 - LQE 414 mm - 120sec_recomp.jpg

ngc217 monkey 3.1.25 414 mm narrow 180 super recon v1.jpg

Helpful Respectful Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
Hard to say what you mean but in general I'd reckon they are likely processed noise from underexposed and over-stretched image.
IronMarcoPolo avatar

Thanks for replying. I am referring to the pink splotches in yellow.NGC7635-2600mc414mm300s-10.14.25_recomp1zoom.jpg

andrea tasselli avatar
Likely a by-product of your processing but to be more definitive I'd need to look at the unprocessed frame.
bigCatAstro avatar

andrea tasselli · Oct 18, 2025 at 02:17 PM

Likely a by-product of your processing but to be more definitive I'd need to look at the unprocessed frame.

I agree, in the Bubble Nebula example, one of the formations near the pink splotches has an unusual blue artifact. I would get similar artifacts when manually stretching too much in Siril or GIMP.

Well Written Insightful Respectful Concise
BlackStarsAstro avatar

Could be a filter issue. There is sometimes image shift using hi-speed filters with slower scopes and vice versa.

Habib Sekha avatar

You might want to share the raw unprocessed stack, pretty sure someone might want to give it a try using a program different from what you have used. This might help in excluding some of the causes and might help to narrow down the cause.

Helpful Insightful Respectful Supportive
IronMarcoPolo avatar

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

BlackStarsAstro avatar

My last idea is to shoot the target without that filter(even no filter) and eliminate that one link in the image train. I didn’t have much success with the svbony dual band filter. some have had success with them. both my 533 osc and 2600duo osc had similar results on my edgeHD8 and my sv550/122mm apo.

andrea tasselli avatar
I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

Nothing wrong with the data, it is just the processing (and the sensor doesn't help too...):
TiffsAndAstro avatar
I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?


I have same filter and with my C6 ay F10 and 533 sensor I get a similar ish result.
I had put it down to me trying to strech my 1h20m of data to within an inch of it's life
be interesting to find it's not  

https://telescopius.com/pictures/view/230459/deep_sky/lbn-549/ngc-7635-bubble-nebula-1h20m-haoiii-f10-bortle6/by-tiffsandastro
TiffsAndAstro avatar
My last idea is to shoot the target without that filter(even no filter) and eliminate that one link in the image train. I didn’t have much success with the svbony dual band filter. some have had success with them. both my 533 osc and 2600duo osc had similar results on my edgeHD8 and my sv550/122mm apo.


Seems it's our processing/stretching
ZigZagZebraz avatar

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 01:38 AM

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OWAApDMcSt_jMJxVuqOwYqUDJfgZzmYf/view?usp=sharing

As others mentioned, just processing. Link to the file in the google drive is above with editor permission. Please post a reply after download so I can delete the file.

Did a quick go at it in Siril. The steps were:

1. RGB Align

2. Astrometry

3. Background Extraction: Siril BG (RBF, 1.0, 100, 0.3, Dither ON), Siril Python Script, Graxpert (1.0)

4. Photometric Color Calibration (GAIA)

5. Starnet, Desaturate Stars (Amplitude 0.3 to 1.0)

6. Starless - Siril GraXpert BGE (1.0). GraXpert Denoise (1.0), Statistical Stretch (0.2, Linked, Normalize), A few GHS passes and Black point adjustment

7. Recompose Starmask and Starless

8. Statistical Stretch (0.05,Linked, Normalize)

Helpful
IronMarcoPolo avatar

andrea tasselli · Oct 19, 2025, 09:12 AM

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?


Nothing wrong with the data, it is just the processing (and the sensor doesn't help too...):

That solves that dilemma. Andrea, thank you so much. I appreciate your time. I’m already in love with this community.

This helps a lot. So the big question, what software did you use? Specifically, I got the pink splotches stretching the stars. I stretch them in the siril star recomp feature.

When you mentioned the sensor doesn’t help, I know it is entry-level. But I used it because the spatial resolution is 2.9 vs 3.67 on my 2600. Since I only have one scope size, I figured that was a better combo for smaller objects like this. Is that not the case? Should I just use my 2600 and crop until I can save up for a bigger scope for smaller objects?

Respectful
andrea tasselli avatar
This was done in PI but I bet it could be done equally well in Siril, except for BXT which has no equivalent in Siril. Yes, to answer your second question, the 2600 camera is a much much better option than the 585MC, better colour quality and less colour cross-talk. And 16 bit. Crop if you need to a have close-up frame but whit such a rich field it would be a waste, IMO.
IronMarcoPolo avatar

ZigZagZebraz · Oct 19, 2025, 12:56 PM

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 01:38 AM

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OWAApDMcSt_jMJxVuqOwYqUDJfgZzmYf/view?usp=sharing

As others mentioned, just processing. Link to the file in the google drive is above with editor permission. Please post a reply after download so I can delete the file.

Did a quick go at it in Siril. The steps were:

1. RGB Align

2. Astrometry

3. Background Extraction: Siril BG (RBF, 1.0, 100, 0.3, Dither ON), Siril Python Script, Graxpert (1.0)

4. Photometric Color Calibration (GAIA)

5. Starnet, Desaturate Stars (Amplitude 0.3 to 1.0)

6. Starless - Siril GraXpert BGE (1.0). GraXpert Denoise (1.0), Statistical Stretch (0.2, Linked, Normalize), A few GHS passes and Black point adjustment

7. Recompose Starmask and Starless

8. Statistical Stretch (0.05,Linked, Normalize)

Got it! Thanks! And thanks for putting your process too.

bigCatAstro avatar

andrea tasselli · Oct 19, 2025 at 03:22 PM

This was done in PI but I bet it could be done equally well in Siril, except for BXT which has no equivalent in Siril.

I’m always amazed when people are able to produce amazing and striking results with Siril. I spent hours and hours on tutorials and could never get good results. It certainly takes a skill that I don’t have, ha!

Well Written Respectful
ZigZagZebraz avatar

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 03:23 PM

ZigZagZebraz · Oct 19, 2025, 12:56 PM

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 01:38 AM

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OWAApDMcSt_jMJxVuqOwYqUDJfgZzmYf/view?usp=sharing

As others mentioned, just processing. Link to the file in the google drive is above with editor permission. Please post a reply after download so I can delete the file.

Did a quick go at it in Siril. The steps were:

1. RGB Align

2. Astrometry

3. Background Extraction: Siril BG (RBF, 1.0, 100, 0.3, Dither ON), Siril Python Script, Graxpert (1.0)

4. Photometric Color Calibration (GAIA)

5. Starnet, Desaturate Stars (Amplitude 0.3 to 1.0)

6. Starless - Siril GraXpert BGE (1.0). GraXpert Denoise (1.0), Statistical Stretch (0.2, Linked, Normalize), A few GHS passes and Black point adjustment

7. Recompose Starmask and Starless

8. Statistical Stretch (0.05,Linked, Normalize)

Got it! Thanks! And thanks for putting your process too.

You’re most welcome. My workflow is even more detailed. If you want, can copy-paste the one I used on my images posted.

This page gives a good start with Siril, if you’re interested.

https://perfectastronomy.com/astrophotography/processing-stacking-fits-seestar-s50-siril/

ZigZagZebraz avatar

bigCatAstro · Oct 19, 2025, 03:34 PM

andrea tasselli · Oct 19, 2025 at 03:22 PM

This was done in PI but I bet it could be done equally well in Siril, except for BXT which has no equivalent in Siril.

I’m always amazed when people are able to produce amazing and striking results with Siril. I spent hours and hours on tutorials and could never get good results. It certainly takes a skill that I don’t have, ha!

With the Beta 1.4.0, there are a lots of improvements. Many python processing scripts were added.

The latest version 1.4.0 Beta 4 incorporated QT6 (whatever that means) Python interface. Can add Seti Astro Suite Cosmic Clarity scripts in there as well. The end results are decent.

bigCatAstro avatar

ZigZagZebraz · Oct 19, 2025 at 04:49 PM

bigCatAstro · Oct 19, 2025, 03:34 PM

andrea tasselli · Oct 19, 2025 at 03:22 PM

This was done in PI but I bet it could be done equally well in Siril, except for BXT which has no equivalent in Siril.

I’m always amazed when people are able to produce amazing and striking results with Siril. I spent hours and hours on tutorials and could never get good results. It certainly takes a skill that I don’t have, ha!

With the Beta 1.4.0, there are a lots of improvements. Many python processing scripts were added.

The latest version 1.4.0 Beta 4 incorporated QT6 (whatever that means) Python interface. Can add Seti Astro Suite Cosmic Clarity scripts in there as well. The end results are decent.

Yes, you can absolutely do that and I salute anyone who does! I woke-up one day and made the decision to move to PI and the rest is history as far as I’m concerned.

ZigZagZebraz avatar

Two weeks ago, I was ready to buy PI.

But, cannot give a monkey a word processor and expect to turn out a novel.

Then, I discovered continuum subtraction in Siril. Guess, the monkey can write a short letter now. 😀

IronMarcoPolo avatar

ZigZagZebraz · Oct 19, 2025, 04:45 PM

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 03:23 PM

ZigZagZebraz · Oct 19, 2025, 12:56 PM

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 19, 2025, 01:38 AM

I greatly appreciate anyone willing to try. I included two fit files, each with different gain settings.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/iho16m0xlvxzj703blxhi/ABN_-rJp0NY8A0D-CDxr4q0?rlkey=wo1lgg0rqvnwobfsrmajvxm6t&st=tijqh1hz&dl=0

Thank you!

I used the SV220 narrowband (7nm pass) on a 6.4 scop. Is that incompatible? If so, do I need wider or narrower pass?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OWAApDMcSt_jMJxVuqOwYqUDJfgZzmYf/view?usp=sharing

As others mentioned, just processing. Link to the file in the google drive is above with editor permission. Please post a reply after download so I can delete the file.

Did a quick go at it in Siril. The steps were:

1. RGB Align

2. Astrometry

3. Background Extraction: Siril BG (RBF, 1.0, 100, 0.3, Dither ON), Siril Python Script, Graxpert (1.0)

4. Photometric Color Calibration (GAIA)

5. Starnet, Desaturate Stars (Amplitude 0.3 to 1.0)

6. Starless - Siril GraXpert BGE (1.0). GraXpert Denoise (1.0), Statistical Stretch (0.2, Linked, Normalize), A few GHS passes and Black point adjustment

7. Recompose Starmask and Starless

8. Statistical Stretch (0.05,Linked, Normalize)

Got it! Thanks! And thanks for putting your process too.

You’re most welcome. My workflow is even more detailed. If you want, can copy-paste the one I used on my images posted.

This page gives a good start with Siril, if you’re interested.

https://perfectastronomy.com/astrophotography/processing-stacking-fits-seestar-s50-siril/

That would be great if you are willing to share. I will check out your webpage too. Thanks!

Well Written Respectful
ZigZagZebraz avatar

IronMarcoPolo · Oct 20, 2025, 01:22 AM

Got it! Thanks! And thanks for putting your process too.

You’re most welcome. My workflow is even more detailed. If you want, can copy-paste the one I used on my images posted.

This page gives a good start with Siril, if you’re interested.

https://perfectastronomy.com/astrophotography/processing-stacking-fits-seestar-s50-siril/

That would be great if you are willing to share. I will check out your webpage too. Thanks!

This is the workflow I used for the Heart Nebula. I do get about 20 to 30 hours of data to reveal fainter details. (With all the explanations, the workflow is in the bottom of this comment).

I use the OSC preprocessing script, modified to include the true drizzle as the earlier one had a debayer step which was not working with 1.4.0 Beta 2. I am guessing the official script is modified suitably.

The main python scripts I use are GraXpert, DBXtract, Cosmic Clarity ones and Continuum subtraction. If they are not there, can be downloaded using “Get Scripts” menu or going to Preferences, scripts and downloaded there. For Cosmic Clarity, you might need to download it from Seti’s Astro website. Use the mirror site (google drive), if available, which is faster. Github is too slow.

(Step 4) DBXtract will extract Ha, Oiii and Sii, based on your sensor spectral response. You can select your astro camera sensor. Do not think it has DSLR sensors. For me Oiii signal is usually weak. I use an Antlia Triband RGB Ultra ii. SV220 will also work well for Ha and Oiii. Not sure about sulfur band.

Continuum subtraction, just followed the video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QQlwel2dAU).

After continuum subtraction, use Ha for R and Oiii for G and B for B for RGB recomposition (Siril menu). Have to do linear match, auto brightness adjust and align (all in the same menu panel).

For SPCC (I have the 10GB Siril SPCC data base downloaded). Found it somewhere and cannot find it again. May be this video will help (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNRGhY6W3SA).

After RGB recomposition, I do the color calibration. You can get away to Photometric color calibration. For SPCC, Siril will complain that there is no header data. This is because, DBXtract probably remove it in the Red layer. If you have not closed Siril, Astrometry dialog will still have the same object name. Just do astrometry and SPCC. If Siril had been closed, just put in the object name (Sh or IC or NGC), focal length and camera pixel size in micron.

Before GHS, if nothing is visible on the screen, do the python script for statistical stretch (stretch factor 0.2, linked and normalize ticked ON). Will have a nice pre-stretch. Sometimes, I had to keep the stretch factor to 0.1, if 0.2 is too bright.

For GHS (Step 8 below), I follow Siril’s official tutorial (https://siril.org/tutorials/ghs/). Type in stretch factor of 2.0 and symmetry point of 0.5. Use the local stretch intensity slider (to negative) to make the curve close to hugging the diagonal.

In the first pass, adjust the highlights close to 0.5 to preserve them. In the second pass, adjust the low lights (shadows) and if required the highlights sliders.

In the Inverse GHS stretch, type in 0.5 in symmetry point. May be about 1 in stretch factor and adjust shadows and highlights.

For Step 9, star recomposition, get the starless that was processed and the starmask into the menu. Typically do not have to stretch starless. For the starmask, type in 7 in the stretch factor. Zoom in to your Siril object window (mouse wheel) to may be 400%. Adjust black point. Usually, 0.03 to 0.04 is enough. You should barely see the black circle around stars.

For post processing I use ON1 Raw Max. There is an AI denoise, which is NOT regenerative. in Raw Max 2025 edition, the AI Denoise 2024 (not the high detail one) works well. Lum denoise of 70 and enhance details of 50 (defaults) and color denoise (100, default) works well.

Yesterday I found that running GraXpert Denoise with a value of 1.0 on the each continuum subtracted layer and the B layer (which are used for RGB composition) produces an end product with very minimal noise. But, might

1. RGB Align

2. Astrometry, Crop

3. Background Extraction: Siril BG (RBF, 1.0, 100, 0.3, Dither ON), Siril Python Script, Graxpert background extraction (1.0)

4. DBXtract, RGB Extract, Continuum Subtraction, Recombine RGB, R=Ha, G=Oiii Continuum Subtraction

5. Spectrophotometric Color Calibration (GAIA)

6. Starnet

7. Starless - Siril GraXpert Denoise (1.0)

8. Siril GHS: 2 iterations, Inverse GHS (1X), Black Point, Histogram stretch, Cosmic Clarity non-stellar sharpening (Default), GraXpert Denoise (1.0)

9. A. Star Recomposition from Starmask and Starless.

10. Save as .png

11. ON1 RawMax 2025, png for web

The above will give you a good start. Eventually, you will find your own settings based on the acquisition and other factor. Hope you find it useful.

All the best and Clear skies.