Comet Lemmon Data Up for Review – Banding / Pixelation Issue

5 replies182 views
Tanja Schmitz avatar

I’m returning to DSO astrophotography after nearly eight years away, and needless to say, my PixInsight skills needed quite a bit of refreshing.

I’m using the same setup as before, but I’ve switched to a Sony A7 IV DSLR for imaging because of its versatility for both deep-sky and wide-field work. Previously, I photographed with a Canon 60Da and never really had any issues processing the data in PixInsight when using proper calibration files.

Last week, I photographed Comet Lemmon and ran into trouble processing the data in PixInsight. I captured 85 light frames (30 s each) along with darks, flats, and bias frames. After integration, the image looked fine, but as soon as I applied DBE or any background neutralisation, it turned into a pixelated mess with banding and generally poor results.

I’m trying to figure out whether the issue lies with my PixInsight skills or the DSLR itself. I had a similar problem when stacking some wide-field shots of the galactic core. Comet Lemmon’s session was under bright moonlight (about 84 %), with the ISO set to 800.

If anyone’s willing to take a look at the data or work on a subframe, I’d love to know whether this is simply user error or an actual data problem.

Original and calibrated/integrated files are available.
I can share a Google Drive link via private message.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Well Written Engaging
Jonathan Hill avatar

Hi Tanja! Welcome back to the astro world!

I’m interested to see the banding you’re referring to. If it's what i’m suspecting, it could be an artifact of the Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) array on the A7 IV sensor. It’s very noticeable in my Nikon Z6ii images (comets in particular due to low integration time) especially after background extraction.

I’d be happy to take a look at your frames and see if they match my Z6ii images, feel free to shoot me a DM if you’re still interested.

Well Written Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Jonathan Hill avatar

Hi Tanja, which bit of banding are you referring to in the below photos: The center column type band, the faint vertical banding, the right image edge banding, or something I missed?

📷 Screenshot 2025-10-14 225910.pngScreenshot 2025-10-14 225910.png📷 Screenshot 2025-10-14 225000.pngScreenshot 2025-10-14 225000.pngI need to dig through my Z6ii images to find an example of the PDAF banding, so I’ll share that when I find it.

Well Written Concise
Tanja Schmitz avatar

The center bit.📷 A.jpgA.jpg
Image A is the integration.
Image C is DBE applied, it’s where this now shows most prominent - and across the whole frame
📷 C.jpgC.jpg

Image B1 / B2 was with Background Neutralization only, which yielded a better result, but it is making it more prominent still. (b2 is stretched for effect
📷 b1.jpgb1.jpg 📷 b2.jpgb2.jpg

Jonathan Hill avatar

After a bit of research (and looking at some of my images from the Z6ii and D850), I think this center band may come from the Sony left/right sensor split technology. I can’t find much information online about the details of it (maybe the full frame sensor is split to increase readout speed for higher FPS shooting?); however, Mark Shelly gives some details on it here in his articles:

https://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/camera_summary.html → (see Manufacturer Generalizations section)

https://www.markshelley.co.uk/Astronomy/sony_concentric_rings.html#SplitSensor

While not the exact same artifact visible here, I wonder if it’s caused by the same sensor characteristic?

Well Written
AstroÅmazer avatar

I use a Z5 and there is a much thinner band in the center where the sensor is split for reads.

Related discussions
Can We Process Astrophotography Images Better Without Starnet?
I’m currently experiencing some issues with Siril on my new PC, which has been quite frustrating. In the past, I primarily used star processing to focus on the object itself, and I had no problems with Siril. However, I now need to figure out how to ...
Returning to DSO processing after break; author also struggling with processing workflow.
Dec 28, 2024
[RCC] Atlas Comet
Can anyone help me deal with the weird artifact at the comet core? Shows up immediately after stacking, probably due to the comet drifting throughout the frame during imaging. How do people deal with this?
Discusses comet imaging artifacts and post-processing banding issues.
Oct 21, 2024
Help - Vertical bands - Flats is the culprit - Can someone help me understand what's happening ?
Hi, Recently I am noticing some weird band like structures in my images. My setup - QHY600PH-M + Takahashi Epsilon 180ED + Astronomik Filters. I Captured RGB images in QHY 2CMS-1 Readout mode at 56 gain for broadband images. (mistake) After noticing ...
Banding/pixelation issues similar to author's band-like structures problem.
Nov 23, 2025
Photographing comet 3I/ATLAS: guiding issues with RC10 telescope setup
Hi everyone, I’m looking for some info… I’d like to try photographing a comet, specifically 3I/ATLAS, weather permitting. I don’t have any experience with this kind of imaging. My setup is an RC10 f/8 with an ASI 294MM, an ASI 174MM OAG on a GM2000 Q...
Author photographing comet; candidate discusses comet photography techniques and troubleshooting.
Dec 17, 2025
Green banding issue in WBPP when using flats
Does anyone know what might be causing this green banding? I’ve never encountered this issue before, and it disappears when I exclude flats from WBPP. I have inspected my flats, and they seem normal. I’ve yet to try retaking the flats or do more test...
Banding issue directly relevant to author's green banding problem in stacked images.
Feb 7, 2026