MLPT within NINA is here!

ASA Community 12 replies298 views
Rupert Smith avatar

Dear all,

As a specialist dealer, I always try and get a little extra for my clients. Many years ago we started a discussion with ASA to update Sequence. Eventually a decision was made to progress an updated Sequence and also look at the possibility of third party support for MLPT. This progressed slowly and when new Sequence was released, sadly it only supported the current generation of mounts.

I’m sure many of you will be aware that there is an ASA Tools plug-in for NINA that allows the creation of models. A chance contact with the developer of this plug-in regarding an Observatory control product we offer, resulted in discussing the plug-in. The ball was set rolling after a chat with Wolfgang at ASA and as a result MLPT is now supported within NINA! Currently this is just for users of the latest generation of mounts as a new version of Autoslew is required…but wait

……support for legacy mounts (DDM60, 85, 160) is coming very soon!

Well Written Helpful Engaging
GerhardK avatar

Very pleasing! Thank you to everyone working on this. Best regards

Well Written Respectful
AnakChan avatar

I’ve managed to get AutoSlew 7.2.5.0 (I’ve got a DDM60) but new AutoSlew versions would require a new licence file. Do you know if this will be a free upgrade or would legacy DDM owners need to buy a new licence?

Well Written
BlackStarsAstro avatar

What is MLPT?

Rupert Smith avatar

Hi

Only Autoslew up to 5.2.4.8 is compatible with older mounts like your 60. These versions all have a licence key which sets the magnetic angle of the motors. The later versions of Autoslew have a licence file.

When the release version of Autoslew 7 is available, it will require a new licence. The suggestion so far is that this will be chargeable for users of legacy mounts. At the moment the final cost of this is not decided. The later versions of Autoslew also use the licence file to activate Sequence as this is also heavily revised.

To my knowledge while 7.2.5.0 supports MLPT via NINA with the latest DDM’s, its not going to be the release version for Legacy.

Note that with a good model, I have been able to achieve unguided images of up to 600s at 3910mm FL with a DDM85 in NINA. With Sequence I have managed 900s subs at the same FL. Therefore while MLPT should offer greater consistency, you should still be able to run unguided even without it.

Also note that if using an ASA mount via NINA, you must use the proxy hub or you will get Ascom errors. These are absent from the latest version of Autoslew.

Helpful
Rupert Smith avatar

MLPT stands for Multi Local Point Tracking. It was a proprietary ASA feature only available when using ASA Sequence for imaging. This is how it works;

  • Let’s say you choose a target and plan to capture 5 × 10min subs.

  • Sequence will look at the amount of time this takes inc AF, readout etc. Let’s say that amounts to 40min total.

  • Sequence will initially perform a local sync to confirm the target position. It will then take multiple images along the path the capture will take and plate solve.

  • The images will reveal the current tracking and PA error at each point. Sequence will make corrections to the drive on both axis so the residual error is 0 arc sec. This ‘local model’ is then sent to Autoslew. If you look in Autoslew you will see an icon on the top right called LPT (LPT came before MLPT). When MLPT tracking is active, this icon goes orange.

MLPT is predictive guiding as opposed to reactive. It is more accurate and far more predictable than normal guiding. It has limits and normally I would suggest each MLPT track is no longer than 45min. It can be capable of more but it’s a simple task to break up your imaging into a series of runs. i.e. instead of a single run of 50 images, you do 10x runs of 5, each with a new MLPT.

MLPT is only really possible with a Direct Drive Mount and probably only an ASA one due to the way an ASA constantly monitors itself. Once you use MLPT I can’t see why you would ever use anything else. Prior to this NINA development it relied upon Sequence, which needed both Maxim and Pinpoint.

Helpful Insightful Engaging Supportive
Rick Krejci avatar

Rupert Smith · Sep 30, 2025, 02:50 PM

MLPT is only really possible with a Direct Drive Mount and probably only an ASA one due to the way an ASA constantly monitors itself

Interesting. How is this different than geared absolute encoder geared mounts like AP and 10u? Users of these mounts (myself included) regularly can image long exposure unguided, in my case with Dec Arc model on a Mach 2. Takes me 10-15 minutes at twilight and I’m good for the whole night. Easily go 5 minutes at 1700mm.

Now ASA mounts are awesome, just trying to understand the limitations of non-ASA mounts you mentioned above.

Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Rupert Smith avatar

Any mechanical system has limits. There will always be an element of free play in the gears. You cannot engineer that out. A mechanical system is also not able to react that fast. Of course the best mechancial mounts are capable of unguided images for short durations but its not really gauranteed. Different users have different experiences.

Unguided imaging with a mechanical mount is at best due to the mount maintaining a constant tracking variable rate instigated by the model.

Direct Drive mounts are able to react instantly to external influences like wind etc if the drive system is self monitoring. They can stiffen and relax on demand. This behaviour also allows them to effectively have a drive that is variable in nature so it can compensate. MLPT makes use of this. An ASA mount has good torque so it is not fazed by gusts of wind etc. Conversley a Planewave DD mount likes to showcase it can do 50°/sec which is trading torque for speed. In my experience I have seen these affected quite easily by wind.

Direct Drive mounts are preferred for Exo Planet research where targets need to remain on target to within a pixel.

DD Mounts can also be very fast and are the first choice for LEO satellite tracking. They can also guide on a satellite.

A DD mount has caveats. It needs to be perfectly balanced and the motors tuned. It is much less tolerent of balance than a mechanical. The technology does, however allow a manufacturer to leverage it to allow for new solutions. MLPT is one of those.

Helpful
Mark McComiskey avatar

Rupert Smith · Sep 30, 2025, 02:50 PM

ly an ASA one due to the way an ASA constantly monitors itself. Once you use MLPT I can’t see why you would ever use anything else. Prior to this NINA development it relied upon Sequence, which needed both Maxim and Pinpoint.

Actually, both the 10Micron and Astrophysics mounts support something more or less equivalent, called Dec-Arc modelling. Both have NINA plug ins that enable this capability. I’ve used the 10u plug in and its dec arc capability and the performance was good. My ASA100 mount does a better overall job, but unless you have a long focal length (1500mm+), you would be hard pressed to tell the difference.

Well Written Helpful Insightful Concise
Rupert Smith avatar

I’m not familiar with the AP option but there is whats called a ‘sidereal track’ option within NINA for 10M, which I assume is a sort of MLPT. The fundamental difference is a mechanical mount cannot be as accurate as a DDM. With less FL you might not see the errors but they are still there and still influence the image. The fact is the best images relay on attention to detail. Optimum tracking and focus etc. The better the fundamentals are, the better the end result.

Mark McComiskey avatar

Absolutely agree with that. I was really just pointing out that the benefits of MLPT were available on other platforms. A better mount with MLPT will always outperform a less good mount with MLPT (recognizing that those are all extraordinary mounts).

I sold my 10u mount to buy the ASA DDM100 because I believed the technology was better and needed more payload.

But it is fair to recognize that improvements in performance only matter if they make a difference in the end result (or, I suppose, ease of use). With my 1100mm fl refractor, the 10u could do 10 minute unguided subs and have perfectly round stars (85%+ eccentricities below 0.35). With the DDM 100, exactly the same result. At the sampling with that telescope, both mounts performed equally well from the perspective of the image. Now, the ASA DDM100 could do 30 minute unguided subs that were just as good as the 10 minute subs, which the 10u could absolutely not do. But 30 minutes subs were not practical for my light polluted skies.

At the 3200mm fl currently on my DDM 100, it absolutely outperforms the 10u.

So the performance improvement from the DDM technology is real, but you need the right use case for it to matter.

Helpful Insightful Engaging Supportive
xlong avatar

Rupert Smith · Sep 30, 2025, 11:24 AM

The ball was set rolling after a chat with Wolfgang at ASA and as a result MLPT is now supported within NINA! Currently this is just for users of the latest generation of mounts as a new version of Autoslew is required…but wait

……support for legacy mounts (DDM60, 85, 160) is coming very soon!

Rupert Smith · Sep 30, 2025, 02:37 PM

To my knowledge while 7.2.5.0 supports MLPT via NINA with the latest DDM’s, its not going to be the release version for Legacy.

Rupert Smith · Sep 30, 2025, 02:37 PM

When the release version of Autoslew 7 is available, it will require a new licence. The suggestion so far is that this will be chargeable for users of legacy mounts.

Hi @Rupert Smith,

First of all, thank you for all the effort, it really gives hope to older DDM mount users.

From your reply, ASA will release a new version of AutoSlew7 (higher than 7.2.5.0) and Sequence that supports the older DDM mount like DDM85 and DDM60, and that older mount users will also be able to use MLTP in NINA with the new AutoSlew 7 ?

cs

xlong

Mark McComiskey avatar

As an fyi, the person that implemented all of the ASA functionality in NINA is @Gerald , a super nice guy, incredibly technically capable and an ASA user as well a a great imager - see his recent IOTD: https://app.astrobin.com/explore/iotd-tp-archive?i=1hb9zy#iotd

He continues to improve his plug in and is one of the founding members of the ASA Users group topic on Astrobin.

Respectful Supportive