New equation locks Hubble constant to light speed value

3 replies•139 views
David Hine avatar

Ho is now locked down or "fixed" to light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 71 k/s/Mpc


Measuring Ho gives the "ballpark" value of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that now locks Ho to light speed, C, which

has to be much more precise.

Note that in in the numerator, distance is multiplied by speed, and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by "spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift along just one dimension only.

In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


With very kind regards, David Hine.


Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com


David Hine avatar

Hi I will add another new equation that compliments the first equation, allowing easily calculation of the Hubble Horizon Distance;-

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc

My name is David Hine, and here is an interesting Hubble Constant equation that "fixes" Ho to local light speed, C.

Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc




In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........


Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to

local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by

"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just

one dimension only.


The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but

the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his

electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C..


With very kind regards, David Hine.


Email:- dhine2999@yahoo.com


=============================================================================================


Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.




oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years




In this equation, directly input the values below:-


oneMpc is 3260000 light years


C (local) is 299792.458 k/s


Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc


one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of

billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of

declaring light years as years only.



===========================================================================================


The "Hubble Tension Issue"


Note:- In the "Dynamic Aether Framework" of the Ho calculating equation in which Ho is "fixed" numerically to C,

the "Hubble Tension issue" is caused by the "DISTANT LOCAL VALUE" of C in the observed space regions being

directly affected by the presence of huge galaxies, black holes. or void areas, RELATIVE to the observer.

Download all attachments as a zip file

Salvatore Iovene avatar

Hi Dave,

AstroBin supports Latex syntax. You can edit your post so that equations are formatted properly if you want!

Screenshot 2025-10-15 at 23.02.21.jpg

Well Written Concise
David Hine avatar

The proper system of doing predictive algebra is to maintian the original units in the equations, and give the answers in the original units. To use the "SI" system for algebra creates errors and severe loss of units information. that then leads to wrong conclusions that wreck truthful cosmology science. I would say that is now the biggest problem that exists for theoretical cosmology these days. I will NEVER use the "SI" system of maths for anything "algebra maths predictive". Simples