Processing the Moons of the Planets

3 replies121 views
Matthew avatar
I was wondering if there is a better way to stack photos of the moons of the planet Saturn because when I stack them in Siril, the stacked image is just blurry, so I am only limited to a single 2-sec exposure. I have a C-11 Edge scope F-10 and a ZWO ASI 183MC for my main cam.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thank you, Matt
Well written Respectful
Tony Gondola avatar
Unlike the planet itself, the moons are relatively faint. Even the brightest, Titan is mag. 8.4 at it's brightest. The rest go down from there. That means that the normal lucky imaging techniques you would use for the planet itself aren't going to be effective. The best you can do is expose properly for the faintest moons you want to capture, just know that you won't capture any details. They are too faint and small.
Well written Helpful Insightful Concise
Tom Williams avatar
Matthew:
I was wondering if there is a better way to stack photos of the moons of the planet Saturn because when I stack them in Siril, the stacked image is just blurry, so I am only limited to a single 2-sec exposure. I have a C-11 Edge scope F-10 and a ZWO ASI 183MC for my main cam.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thank you, Matt

Siril isn't particularly optimal as far as planetary stacking goes. I use Autostakkert!4 alongside many others. Depending on your seeing and stacking settings, it should be possible to obtain the moons in the "normal" captures that have Saturn properly exposed. Capturing in 16-bit mode improves your chances but I've still obtained Mimas (mag +13) in 8-bit mode. Siril is useful for processing the stacked images however; autostretch and atrous-wavelets transform can come in handy when teasing out the moons.

For what it's worth, I tend to stack at 25% (of 2 mins) for Saturn's moons. 12ms exposure at 500 gain with the Uranus-C/M at f/17.5.

CS, Tom
Helpful Respectful Concise
andrea tasselli avatar
Not quite sure whether you are after surface details in Saturn's moons (forget it) or actually exposing correctly so they look round. In my experience the typical short exposure to capture Saturn is enough to get all the main ones, down to m14 or thereabouts.
Related discussions
Would you replace the Built in UV/IR cut on a 2600MC with AR glass?
Hello All, I am looking to replace the built in UV/IR cut window on a 2600MC-Pro with AR window and using a better UV/IR cut filter with better cutoffs in the UV and IR (Baader cmos optimized UV/IR cut filter) so i get less UV and IR and better glass...
Discusses UV/IR filtering for ZWO cameras; relevant to image quality optimization.
Sep 18, 2025
Mysterious star trailing solved: a cautionary tale of fan vibration with a fan cooled (especially ZWO) camera.
Suddenly after no problems with star shapes, the next night out they were just terrible! Below I show a gif comparing two 2 hr stacks, one with the good stars, and the next with elongated stars. In this example the distortion was vertical. But later ...
Addresses image stacking issues and ZWO camera problems; directly relevant to blur problem.
Nov 18, 2025