Request for critique

Nicely done but not the palette I would ever choose.

P.S.: and black point way too much in the red.

Thanks @Tony Gondola @andrea tasselli - noted on the stars, usually for nebuale with faint details and less interesting galaxy field i prefer reducing stars to highlight whats more interesting to me which is the faint neboulosity 

What im looking for is feed back on processing flaws, not necessarily color or saturation. hint: this is a mosaic 
however sometimes i wonder since I have a form of color blindess (Deutan: less sensitive to green/red) how people with normal vision see the picture

I agree with Andrea – wonderful image, but the red-tinted background detracts.  I think the nebula would pop with a more neutral background.

so, looking at it closely, I see:

1. background does have some red tint; Colormask script is good for manipulating just a certain color without changing the tint on the whole image
2. stars are just right - it's good to make it feel like they're just in the background, and not "in our face"; pushing them more would be a bad decision
3. the color of the HA is somehow not pleasing - I guess I like less green in the HA maybe? green looks better in the highlights of the HA, more than in the rest of the histogram. (you can get that fiery look if you adjust green just right)
4. OIII looks okay, could've possibly made it pop more though

I think it's a decent image overall

Overall a very nice and well done image - here my few points for consideration:

1. Black point is too red - this is unreal and harms the overall impression
2. Stars are too much reduced, probably slightly more visible would be beneficial
3. The red in the image is for my liking a bit to "brownish"

Positive is - the image is not oversharpened, not oversaturated and nicely composed

CS
Georg

I think the revision got it worse (or I mis-remember). The stitching between the two panels I still can't see. But I see mismatching (abrupt change between one emission area with the next badly stitched together) between Ha and OIII and an increase in noise in areas. On top of that saturation is gone even higher and the black point is even redder and stars even fainter (see caveat mentioned before). It's your jig so you can play like you want but this is what I found unpleasing. And the hues, that hasn't changed either. 

Nice PN you got there, by the way…

Thanks everyone for the look, Correct @Georg N. Nyman I think its a question of preference at this point. The dark areas are quite equal in RGB values now from where i was inspecting (Non Ha areas).

PN name: Pa-28 (Pk076.8-08.1)

I'd be more impressed (and deeply envious!) with the quality of your skies.

From where I stand B4.5 sounds like AP nirvana…