Which Filter set for Mono narrowband Imaging?

andrea tasselli
26 replies596 views
Menelaos avatar
Hi there. I just aquired my first mono camera (ZWO ASI 585 MM pro) and i made the mistake to buy the cheapest SHO narrowband filters possible (the SV227 filter set). I now suffer from severe haloing. Although other than the halos the filters are actually not that bad considering, i get good signal. Anyway i am here to ask the question to the more experienced guys out here:
Which brand offers halo free filter set? I dont mind wider band like 7nm for example and it has to be 2" mounted filters. I know i will have to spend some money on this but as little as possible would be ideal.
andrea tasselli avatar
Chroma. Ain't the cheapest tough. Just the opposite. Other than that I haven't found halos (at f/4) with either Baader Ha filter (6.5nm) and Astrodon OIII filter (6nm). Both 1.25" version.
Gamaholjad avatar
I've found the Antlia range good for starting. I use dark series lrgb. And 3.0nm ha,sii,oii for nebula. Reasonable pricing.  I originally started with zwo filters and couldn't get on with them.  Have fun with your mono camera opens up so many options, and processing is fun too.
Quinn Groessl avatar
Good luck completely getting rid of halos. Generally you have to pay up to do that. AgenaAstro in their disclaimer for halos with Antila filters recommends Chroma or Astrodon filters. No matter what  you're going to be paying up, especially if you're insisting on 2" filters.
Helpful Concise
Brian avatar
Hi,

I own the 585 Mono by ToupTek.
Im using the 1,25" ToupTek filterset.
https://www.touptekastro.com/en-eu/products/sho-filters?variant=50556267266360
https://www.touptekastro.com/en-eu/products/lrgb-filters
I also own the 36mm set for my IMX571. 

No issues so far.

When you like to buy filters with a better reputation and quality (ToupTeks are good so far) take a look at Astronomik or Chroma.
I know several people with Astronomik. They are using the filters with fasters then f4 with no problems.

https://www.astronomik.com/en/Narrowband-Filters/HSO/
They have 12nm and 6nm in different sizes.

Chroma is quiet expensive.
But they offer filters with the same or better quality as Astronomik with tighter bands.
Helpful
ScottF avatar
Chroma filters. I can only dream of owning them at this point.
Well Written
Astro Hopper avatar
Antlia, good quality for reasonable price!!! I use them LRGB and 4,5 EDGE for SHO and no halos at all. And above all good contrast in narrowband set. I shoot from Bortle 7 and up until now had no issues wit them:
Arun H avatar
Quinn Groessl:
Good luck completely getting rid of halos. Generally you have to pay up to do that. AgenaAstro in their disclaimer for halos with Antila filters recommends Chroma or Astrodon filters. No matter what  you're going to be paying up, especially if you're insisting on 2" filters.

Astrodon of today isn't the Astrodon of old after Don sold his business.

Chroma is probably the only real option. 

Pretty reputable imagers seem to be having good luck with Antlia, but there are varying opinions on this. With Chroma, you get consistency and support, at a price.
ScottF avatar
If I could stomach the price, I'd get Chroma, but it's pricey for a half-baked imager like myself. lol
Dane Vetter avatar
Hi,

I have been using Astronomik filters for years and am very satisfied. I think they are very good value for money and I have not had any problems with halos so far. The filters from Chroma and Astrodon are out of proportion for me, and unfortunately even these manufacturers are not exempt from halos.

https://www.astronomik.com/en/Narrowband-Filters/
Seung-Jun Kim avatar
Based on my personal experience using Antlia, Optolong, Baader, and Astronomik filters, I personally prefer Antlia over the others. Antlia consistently produced very minimal halos, which significantly improved the quality of my images.

Additionally, Antlia filters are priced in a more affordable range, offering great value for their performance.

I do acknowledge that Chroma and Astrodon filters are superior in terms of quality. In nearly every comparison, they exhibit less halo and better peak transmission. However, their cost is roughly 3 to 4 times higher, which makes them less accessible for many users.
Well Written Helpful Respectful Concise
Dan Kohn avatar
I am also just starting out in Mono narrowband, and I went with the Scorpio SHO set (5nm, 3nm is about $100 more), a bit over $400 for the set.  I had seen excellent reviews on Cloudy nights, and so far no issues, no halos.  They are available on Aliexpress.  https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/938884-short-review-of-the-scorpio-3nm-sho-filters-on-aliexpress/?hl=%2Bscorpio+%2Bnarrow+%2Bband#entry13784240, example image: https://www.astrobin.com/6thckp/B/,  https://www.astrobin.com/yvcpph/F/
Helpful
Tony Gondola avatar
Brian:
Hi,

I own the 585 Mono by ToupTek.
Im using the 1,25" ToupTek filterset.
https://www.touptekastro.com/en-eu/products/sho-filters?variant=50556267266360
https://www.touptekastro.com/en-eu/products/lrgb-filters
I also own the 36mm set for my IMX571. 

No issues so far.

When you like to buy filters with a better reputation and quality (ToupTeks are good so far) take a look at Astronomik or Chroma.
I know several people with Astronomik. They are using the filters with fasters then f4 with no problems.

https://www.astronomik.com/en/Narrowband-Filters/HSO/
They have 12nm and 6nm in different sizes.

Chroma is quiet expensive.
But they offer filters with the same or better quality as Astronomik with tighter bands.

I have had the same experience with my ATR585M from touptek. All of the filters L,R,G.B, Ha, Oiii  and Sii work just fine with no halos.
Well Written Concise
jmdl101 avatar
Dan Kohn:
I am also just starting out in Mono narrowband, and I went with the Scorpio SHO set (5nm, 3nm is about $100 more), a bit over $400 for the set.  I had seen excellent reviews on Cloudy nights, and so far no issues, no halos.  They are available on Aliexpress.  https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/938884-short-review-of-the-scorpio-3nm-sho-filters-on-aliexpress/?hl=%2Bscorpio+%2Bnarrow+%2Bband#entry13784240, example image: https://www.astrobin.com/6thckp/B/,  https://www.astrobin.com/yvcpph/F/


That's the thread I started on cloudynights, and I'm still loving my Scorpio filters. I just ordered a 36mm LRGB and 5nm SHO set. I think they're out of stock on 1.25" 5nm SHO right now, but they restock fairly often.
Well Written
Lynn K avatar
I use Astronomic 6nm MaxFR for Ha & SII.  Chroma F3 3nm OIII.  Al are are halo free.

If you are slower than F4, you don't need the MaxFR and can use the regular Astronomic 6 or 12 nm.

Lynn K.
HR_Maurer avatar
I use Chroma, and i dont have an issue with Halos i think. My older Baader filters (bought 2nd hand like 7 or 8 years ago) didnt have an issue, too, as far as i would tell.
However, when i bought my filters from Chroma (4-5 years ago? Antlia was just new), i had to check the transmission curve, and after checking it i had to discuss with some engineers, to get one replaced. The transmission wavelength had been unsuitable for the desired aperture ratio. 
Chroma sent Transmission spectra, and these werent necessarily wrong, But you dont know exactly the incident engle and angle distribution in their spectrometer. And i cloud perform spectrometric measurements myself, including parametrization of the incidence angle.

Back then when i bought these filters, Chroma didnt cherry pick the filters for specific applications. I think they ran their coating process with certain parameters, and then sold their filters accordingly. If the transmission wavelength was a bit off, they didnt care. Back then, buying an Antlia filter could happen to give you better (and much cheaper) performance, since Antlia did cherry picking. As far as i know. 
I dont buy NB filters so often, but i think Chroma changed that procedure some years ago. That's the benefit of competition! As far as i read, they're now cherry picking their filters, considering the transmisison peak blue shift for the desired aperture ratio.
Brian Diaz avatar
HI

I use chroma , Antlia and astronomik. 
 

My List :
Chroma
Astronomik
Antlia


CS
Brian
Arun H avatar
Lynn K:
I use Astronomic 6nm MaxFR for Ha & SII.  Chroma F3 3nm OIII.  Al are are halo free.

If you are slower than F4, you don't need the MaxFR and can use the regular Astronomic 6 or 12 nm.

Lynn K.

I also have considered a mix and match approach where I’d use Chroma for OIII and cheaper filters for everything else. The problem is that you’d have to readjust your OAG focus when changing filters due to the different glass thickness.
Well Written Insightful Concise
Anthony MICHEL avatar
Dan Kohn:
I am also just starting out in Mono narrowband, and I went with the Scorpio SHO set (5nm, 3nm is about $100 more), a bit over $400 for the set.  I had seen excellent reviews on Cloudy nights, and so far no issues, no halos.  They are available on Aliexpress.  https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/938884-short-review-of-the-scorpio-3nm-sho-filters-on-aliexpress/?hl=%2Bscorpio+%2Bnarrow+%2Bband#entry13784240, example image: https://www.astrobin.com/6thckp/B/,  https://www.astrobin.com/yvcpph/F/

I also have bought a full filters set of Scorpio LRGBSHO 2" 3nm.
They work very well, halo free, very happy with the results.
Bruce Donzanti avatar
I have two complete 2” mounted NB sets that I have used for years:

Chroma - on a C11” EdgeHD

Antlia - which have been used on several small refractors

I’ve never had any issues with either set.  While Chroma is the king of filters, I bought mine many years ago before the ridiculous price hike.   

Bottom line:  Chroma if you have the budget but Antlia is a viable option that you will be very pleased with.
Helpful Concise Supportive
Tony Gondola avatar
Bruce Donzanti:
I have two complete 2” mounted NB sets that I have used for years:

Chroma - on a C11” EdgeHD

Antlia - which have been used on several small refractors

I’ve never had any issues with either set.  While Chroma is the king of filters, I bought mine many years ago before the ridiculous price hike.   

Bottom line:  Chroma if you have the budget but Antlia is a viable option that you will be very pleased with.

If there are no issues with either set, what makes Chroma the king?
andrea tasselli avatar
Money.
danieldh206 avatar
Tony Gondola:
Bruce Donzanti:
I have two complete 2” mounted NB sets that I have used for years:

Chroma - on a C11” EdgeHD

Antlia - which have been used on several small refractors

I’ve never had any issues with either set.  While Chroma is the king of filters, I bought mine many years ago before the ridiculous price hike.   

Bottom line:  Chroma if you have the budget but Antlia is a viable option that you will be very pleased with.

If there are no issues with either set, what makes Chroma the king?

If you get halos with a Chroma filter, Chroma will exchange the filters, but I have never heard of anyone having halo issues with Chroma filters. With all other brands of filters, you are playing "halo roulette."  
You don't need Chroma filters for LRGB, and most narrowband filters with a width of 6nm or greater will not have a significant halo problem. It is when you get into the 5nm or smaller bandpasses that halos become an issue. 
I run a set of Antlia and Astrodon filters with no halo issues.
Well Written Helpful Insightful Concise
andrea tasselli avatar
Plenty of examples of halos with RGB filters and there is no systemic casual relationship between bandwidth and haloes.
Arpad R avatar
Dan Kohn:
I am also just starting out in Mono narrowband, and I went with the Scorpio SHO set (5nm, 3nm is about $100 more), a bit over $400 for the set.  I had seen excellent reviews on Cloudy nights, and so far no issues, no halos.  They are available on Aliexpress.  https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/938884-short-review-of-the-scorpio-3nm-sho-filters-on-aliexpress/?hl=%2Bscorpio+%2Bnarrow+%2Bband#entry13784240, example image: https://www.astrobin.com/6thckp/B/,  https://www.astrobin.com/yvcpph/F/

I have also been looking at these filters for a while. Great price if the specs are true. I'm just worried about bandpass shift at f/4 and below which is why I've been mostly looking at 6nm/7nm filters.
Well Written