Anyone using this with a 120mm f/7.5 OTA?

2 replies128 views
Bob ten Berge avatar
I can't figure out what the adjustment value for this focal length should be.
The OTA I'm using this on is a Sky-Watcher Equinox 120ED Pro f/7.5, with a 900mm focal length.

This is the list that Teleskop Service provides with the required, but I can't for the life of me figure out the correct adjustment for my scope:
The following settings from the innermost position of the adjustment to the sensor are recommended:

aperture 80 mm / focal ratio f/6 - 81.2 mm

aperture 80 mm / focal ratio f/7 - 80.2 mm

Aperture 102 mm / focal ratio f/7 - 75.3 mm

Aperture 115 mm / focal ratio f/7 - 73.0 mm    (focal length: 805mm)

Aperture 125 mm / focal ratio f/7.8 - 69.7 mm    (focal length: 975mm)

Aperture 130 mm / focal ratio f/7 - 69.7 mm    (focal length: 910mm)

Aperture 140 mm / focal ratio f/6.5 - 68.0 mm    (focal length: 910mm)

Aperture 155 mm / focal ratio f/8 - 57.0 mm

I added the actual focal length in Italic behind the examples that are close to my scope.

The backfocus is determined by the last lens element in the imaging train, so it should be this corrector.
Since this corrector is adjustable, I'm assuming the backfocus changes when rotating the adjustment collar, and these recommended positions in the list above show the different backfocus values.

In my image train looks like this:

The rotator takes up 15.2mm and the filter wheel 20mm. The camera is directly threaded onto the filter wheel and adds 6.5mm to the actual sensor.
This totals to 41.2mm, so I just figured I'd set the adjustment ring to 13.3mm and get to a total backfocus of 55mm.
The images I take with this setting do appear sharp, but when I set the adjustment ring to something like 5mm the focus changes, of course, but the image does seem to be just as sharp after refocusing.
So, I wonder, how important is it to get this dialed in perfectly? Can anyone help me out here?

The answer to this question I got from Teleskop-Service was that the adjustment value should be "somewhere around 70mm", which is too vague for me tbh.
But if that is true, I would have to include the 11mm ring on my camera to get to 52.2mm and adjust the corrector to 17.8mm.

Thanks for reading this rant!
Helpful Engaging
SkyHoinar avatar
Hello,

I have this field corrector and I use it with a TS-Optics CF APO 80 mm f/6.

I am not sure I understand what your question actually is, but I will share my setup with this corrector.

My aperture is 80 mm, so according to the TS-Optics specifications, I should reach a distance of 81.2 mm from the corrector to the sensor.

In my optical path after the corrector I have:
- an off-axis guider, with an optical path of 21 mm
- a filter drawer with an optical path of 16.5 mm
- the camera with an optical path from the front to the sensor of 17.5 mm

This gives a total optical path of 21 + 16.5 + 17.5 = 55 mm

Which means that, in order to reach the 81.2 mm, I am missing 81.2 - 55 = 26.2 mm.

So, I have to set the corrector to 26.2 mm.
And this is more or less the value to which my corrector is set (see screenshot below)





Now, in your case, you have an aperture of 120 mm, so according to the TS-Optics specifications you are between:
- 115 mm aperture which requires a distance of 73 mm
- and 125 mm aperture which requires a distance of 69.7 mm
So for 120mm take the average between the two: (73 + 69.7) / 2 =~ 71.3 mm

I understand that after the corrector you have:
- a rotator of 15.2 mm
- a filter wheel of 20 mm
- the camera adding 6.5 mm

This gives a total of 15.2 + 20 + 6.5 = 41.7 mm

In order to reach 71.3 mm you need to set your corrector somewhere arround this value 71.3 - 41.7 = 29.6 mm.

This is my opinion. I hope it helps.
Helpful
Bob ten Berge avatar
Hi, thanks for your reply!

The thing that is confusing me, is that the aperture doesn't seem to be the only deciding factor.
As you can see in the example list from TS, the 125mm and 130mm apertures have the same adjustment value, while their focal differs.

But I guess your opinion/guess is good enough for me to try out the next time there's clear skies.
We'll see how that goes, it may take a while because the forecast is not that good!
Well Written Respectful
Related discussions
Dithering amount
I have a question, and truly I’m not finding my answer on the internet so I’m hoping someone can answer it for me. My question; is there a formula I can use to figure out the amount of dithering movements needed for a given focal length camera combin...
Discusses adjustment values for specific focal lengths, directly relevant to dithering formula question.
Dec 10, 2023
Skywatcher 0.9x coma corrector
Hello Just a quick question. I`m using a 150 PDS (FL 750 mm). According to my calculations using this corrector should come out at 675 mm. I took an image and it plate solved at 698 mm. Does this mean the spacing is too close or too far away from the...
Similar focal length adjustment and corrector spacing calculation problem.
Oct 4, 2023
How do I choose a camera sensor/barlow combination that will approximate the view given by a particular eyepiece?
I know that, for example, a 9mm eyepiece has a focal length of 9mm. Dividing a telescopes focal length by the focal length of an eyepiece used gives approximate magnification. We don’t think in terms of magnification when using a camera sensor instea...
Discusses focal length calculations relevant to telescope configuration adjustments.
Dec 31, 2025
Field flattener to camera distance, positioning the filter wheel correctly & what do I need?
[size=100]Getting correct (55mm) distance between field flattener and Camera CCD with ZWO EFW inbetween the two… Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum so please forgive my lack of knowledge as I am relatively new to astrophotography & se...
Addresses focal length adjustment values for optical configurations similar to yours.
Feb 1, 2024