Help needeed to fill the gaps of a mosaic.

3 replies116 views
JB Auroux avatar
Hi everyone ! 

Back in summer 2021, I captured a 2-panel mosaic of Sh2-119, and in summer 2023, a 4-panel mosaic of NGC 7000.
Both were done using the same setup and camera (TSA102 + Atik 16200).
 

While stitching the Sh2-119 tiles this weekend (yes, 4 years after acquisition — no rush here... 😂), I realized that both mosaics actually have enough overlap to be combined into a single, larger mosaic.


 

Unfortunately, since this wasn’t planned in advance, and as you can see in the image, I have a slight framing issue between the two sets — meaning I’d need to crop way too much for the larger mosaic to be of any real interest...
 

Since I’ve sold the camera in the meantime, waiting for this summer to fill in the gaps isn’t really an option.
 

So — if any of you happen to have raw data covering all or part of the missing regions and would be willing to share it, I’d be truly grateful! 🙂
It doesn’t have to cover every missing part — just enough to avoid excessive cropping in the final mosaic (especially sparing NGC 7000...).
 

Ideally, I’d need all three SHO channels; and if the data was taken with a refractor (for star profiles), that would be even better.
My sampling is 2"/px, so anything reasonably close would work fine.
 

Thanks a lot in advance, and feel free to contact me here or via PM! 🙂
 

Clear skies to all,
JB (aka “the framing king” 🙂)
Well Written Respectful Engaging
JB Auroux avatar
Well, no sooner had I posted this here than a solution presented itself!
Thanks for your attention, and see you soon with the final result! ;)
JB
Well Written
AstroDarks avatar
I have this data if you'd like to use. Let me know! https://app.astrobin.com/u/AstroDarks?i=zamwyz#gallery
Alan Brunelle avatar
JB Auroux:
Hi everyone ! 

Back in summer 2021, I captured a 2-panel mosaic of Sh2-119, and in summer 2023, a 4-panel mosaic of NGC 7000.
Both were done using the same setup and camera (TSA102 + Atik 16200).
 

While stitching the Sh2-119 tiles this weekend (yes, 4 years after acquisition — no rush here... 😂), I realized that both mosaics actually have enough overlap to be combined into a single, larger mosaic.


 

Unfortunately, since this wasn’t planned in advance, and as you can see in the image, I have a slight framing issue between the two sets — meaning I’d need to crop way too much for the larger mosaic to be of any real interest...
 

Since I’ve sold the camera in the meantime, waiting for this summer to fill in the gaps isn’t really an option.
 

So — if any of you happen to have raw data covering all or part of the missing regions and would be willing to share it, I’d be truly grateful! 🙂
It doesn’t have to cover every missing part — just enough to avoid excessive cropping in the final mosaic (especially sparing NGC 7000...).
 

Ideally, I’d need all three SHO channels; and if the data was taken with a refractor (for star profiles), that would be even better.
My sampling is 2"/px, so anything reasonably close would work fine.
 

Thanks a lot in advance, and feel free to contact me here or via PM! 🙂
 

Clear skies to all,
JB (aka “the framing king” 🙂)

You certainly would not need data from exactly the same camera to achieve a nice result. 

I have seen a decent number of "partial" mosaics displayed on AB while users are still in the processing mode.  But more rarely have I seen completed projects where the crop, or lack of cropping is displayed on purpose in the final display.  I think there are also well-known Hubble images that are done that way.  It is not commonly done, but I have kind of warmed to those presentations.  At least some of them.  Here, I think your mosaic does not lend itself to that sort of presentation with the data you have, but with a few more fields/frames, it might make a nice presentation.  I remember back in the day (decades ago) that print photos sometimes were presented with black borders.  This was also an artistic approach to highlight two things: 1. the black border itself made for a framing or effective matting of the image, 2. The black border was a verification that the full film frame was being displayed and that no cropping was done in the printing process.  This second point was a means for the photographer to brag that they had framed the subject perfectly during the shoot, rather than being lazy and crop after the fact, I suppose...!
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Related discussions
Help pushing back the clouds.
Hi Everyone, I asking for help finishing a 2 panel mosaic I started mid Nov 2023. I have been socked in with clouds. Got the Ha data on 2 consecutive nights then in the last 50 days have only had 1 clear night. This is what I have captured so far. ht...
Author discusses multi-panel mosaic challenges; similar data collection experience relevant.
Jan 22, 2024
Esprit 150 and 0.77x reducer Full Frame expectation
Hi, Anyone using the Esprit 150 + the 0.77x with full frame camera? Any Vignetting? How are the stars at the corners? Does it need cropping of image to get good stars at the corners? I am looking to create 3x2 Mosaic and Bad Stars/ Vignetting will hu...
Addresses multi-panel mosaic gaps and overlap considerations for astrophotography mosaics.
Aug 4, 2023