Sharpstar 15028HNT-AL

10 replies434 views
Robert Sahari avatar
Hello to you all.

I just received my Sharpstar 15028HNT-AL and did a quick inspection of the scope. There's some changes being made to the carbon fibre tubed version.

The scope comes with the bare necessities, like allen keys, adapters and an collimation eyecap to collimate the scope.

The tube is now made out of extruded aluminum and has a nice textured finish. All other parts are made from aluminum aswell and either anodized black or red. So there's basically no temeperature coefficent differences anymore between all the parts. All the screws inside the tube are blackened very well.

The spider and secondary holder have been redesigned aswell as the primary mirror cell. This should make collimating easier and more stable according to Sharpstar. I'll keep you posted on that once I get the chance to do some tests.

The coma corrector is now easier to install and deinstall by using a collar that can be screwed on and off by the four hex-screws instead of the awkward it had before lockingring.

The focuser got rid of the flathead screws for the rotation and now has hex-screws there aswell. The maximum travel of the focuser is 20mm and it the rack&pinion mechanics feel very smooth. It's completely blackened inside and out.

One thing I'll do immediately after testing the optics will be to flock the tube with Protostar velour, aswell as the veins of the spider and the edge of the secondary mirror, which is unfortunately not blackened. And I'll have to 3d-print a dew/straylight-shield first thing tomorrow after taking measurements.

All in all this telescope feels and looks very good, but I'll have to test it first to make any statement about the optics ofcourse.

Sorry for the dust on the images, these are not scratches on the coma corrector for example



Helpful Engaging
Alex Nicholas avatar
I'm very keen on one of these, except I don't want to buy more narrowband filters just for this scope hahaha. I might get one and keep it just for LRGB imaging at dark sites. 

Nice pics and write up, looking forward to seeing some results from it!
daywalker avatar
I do love a newtonian..I so was close to buying one of these this week albeit the 130-AL but I bought a mount instead. Interested to see how easy you find it to work with this second generation.Are you fitting an EAF? I read somewhere they are a tight fit because of the focuser orientation and not being able to rotate the focuser on this new version?!
Robert Sahari avatar
Alex Nicholas:
I'm very keen on one of these, except I don't want to buy more narrowband filters just for this scope hahaha. I might get one and keep it just for LRGB imaging at dark sites. 

Nice pics and write up, looking forward to seeing some results from it!

As I'll be using a Player One Poseidon-C colour camera (IMX571) I don't really need any additional filters. Maybe the Askar C1 and C2 at some point, but for now the UV/IR and Ha+Oiii dual narrowband filters I allready have will do nicely. And yes, the UV/IR filter is needed as Player One doesn't have them preinstalled on their cameras.
I do love a newtonian..I so was close to buying one of these this week albeit the 130-AL but I bought a mount instead. Interested to see how easy you find it to work with this second generation.Are you fitting an EAF? I read somewhere they are a tight fit because of the focuser orientation and not being able to rotate the focuser on this new version?!

I'm not using an EAF. I need to setup the scope in my backyard everytime I have clear nightskies anyways, so I can aswell do some quick collimation and focusing with a tri-bahtinov mask. I remote control the miniPC and NINA from my iPad or PC, so I check regularily how the images look. I'm doing it this way for the last three years and it works well and gives me a reason to get some fresh air every now and then

EDIT: I did some quick testing of all the new electronics (mount, cameras, powerbricks and miniPC) to see if everything works. I use a Minix Z100-0dB with GSServer, PHD2 and NINA to control the setup, controlled via remote desktop over my WLAN router. All working as intended

Helpful
Alex Nicholas avatar
As I'll be using a Player One Poseidon-C colour camera (IMX571) I don't really need any additional filters. Maybe the Askar C1 and C2 at some point, but for now the UV/IR and Ha+Oiii dual narrowband filters I allready have will do nicely. And yes, the UV/IR filter is needed as Player One doesn't have them preinstalled on their cameras


I used to have a player one camera so I'm 100% aware that you need a uv/ir cut. Narrowband filters tend to only work properly with f/3.5~f/4. Otherwise you suffer bandpass shift. The f/2.8 scopes really need specific narrowband filters designed for f/3 and faster scopes... the c1 will be OK because it's bandpass is so wide. My narrowband filters are 3.5nm, and if i used the Ha filter with a f/2.8 telescope, it would not capture Ha, but rather something 2.5~3nm away...

I'd need a new set of narrowband filters to do narrowband imaging with this scope.
Helpful Insightful Concise
Robert Sahari avatar
Alex Nicholas:
As I'll be using a Player One Poseidon-C colour camera (IMX571) I don't really need any additional filters. Maybe the Askar C1 and C2 at some point, but for now the UV/IR and Ha+Oiii dual narrowband filters I allready have will do nicely. And yes, the UV/IR filter is needed as Player One doesn't have them preinstalled on their cameras


I used to have a player one camera so I'm 100% aware that you need a uv/ir cut. Narrowband filters tend to only work properly with f/3.5~f/4. Otherwise you suffer bandpass shift. The f/2.8 scopes really need specific narrowband filters designed for f/3 and faster scopes... the c1 will be OK because it's bandpass is so wide. My narrowband filters are 3.5nm, and if i used the Ha filter with a f/2.8 telescope, it would not capture Ha, but rather something 2.5~3nm away...

I'd need a new set of narrowband filters to do narrowband imaging with this scope.

Yes. If you use mono cameras and "real" narrowband filters this will be an issue. With colour cameras and the dual or multi "narrowband" filters it's no problem though, as these tend to have some 15nm or even wider bandpasses.

EDIT: First thing to do to test this new scope is to print a tri-bahtinov mask for proper star collimation. It doesn't get astronomically dark here anymore, but nautical dark will do to do a general test of the optics of this scope.

My Ender 3-S1 is barely big enough to print parts for this scope. I immediately need to peel off the teststrip on the lefthand side on the printbed, or it would be in the way. See the discoloured line on the left edge going through the outer circle of the print in progress.

andrea tasselli avatar
Alex Nicholas:
I used to have a player one camera so I'm 100% aware that you need a uv/ir cut. Narrowband filters tend to only work properly with f/3.5~f/4. Otherwise you suffer bandpass shift. The f/2.8 scopes really need specific narrowband filters designed for f/3 and faster scopes... the c1 will be OK because it's bandpass is so wide. My narrowband filters are 3.5nm, and if i used the Ha filter with a f/2.8 telescope, it would not capture Ha, but rather something 2.5~3nm away...

I'd need a new set of narrowband filters to do narrowband imaging with this scope.


Band shift occurs at any angle other than null, and it will be showing at f/4 compared to an f/6-f/8 system. CO also would make things rather worse than for an unobstructed telescope. Finally, at f/2.8 even wider bandpass will show shifting and you may run short of Ha in some case (where the Ha signal is of the same level of the Hb). Fast narrowband filters are the answer in these cases (ALP-T).
Robert Sahari avatar
I got an hour of clear skies before the clouds rolled in again yesterday around midnight, so I setup the scope, tested all the electronics, put on the tri-bahtinov mask and did a quick test of the collimation.

I didn't try to test anything else really as this was also the first time that I was using the miniPC with NINA, GSServer and PHD2 installed.

I did some initial test of the three-point polar align plugin and tried to get PHD2 to guide, but as it was -1°C I wasn't too keen on spending much time with it, when there's no opportunity to shoot anything for the next 5 month anyways. All I can say is that the setup works in general.

So here it is. This is a single 3 second autostretched subframe with the tri-bahtinov mask of Polaris. I must say that the collimation out of the box isn't too bad. The outwards radial pattern suggest that the backfocus is too close so I'll need to try out some spacers... 0.5mm maybe.

Helpful Insightful Engaging
Alex Nicholas avatar
andrea tasselli:
Alex Nicholas:
I used to have a player one camera so I'm 100% aware that you need a uv/ir cut. Narrowband filters tend to only work properly with f/3.5~f/4. Otherwise you suffer bandpass shift. The f/2.8 scopes really need specific narrowband filters designed for f/3 and faster scopes... the c1 will be OK because it's bandpass is so wide. My narrowband filters are 3.5nm, and if i used the Ha filter with a f/2.8 telescope, it would not capture Ha, but rather something 2.5~3nm away...

I'd need a new set of narrowband filters to do narrowband imaging with this scope.


Band shift occurs at any angle other than null, and it will be showing at f/4 compared to an f/6-f/8 system. CO also would make things rather worse than for an unobstructed telescope. Finally, at f/2.8 even wider bandpass will show shifting and you may run short of Ha in some case (where the Ha signal is of the same level of the Hb). Fast narrowband filters are the answer in these cases (ALP-T).

Yes, this is what I mean. Any faster than F/4 or so, with a 3 or even 6nm filter will start to be problematic. As I'll mentioned, the Askar c1 filter being very wide at 15nm Ha, and 35nm OIII MIGHT be OK at f/2.8... however, with my 3.5nm filters, or even the askar D1 I used to have, you will run into trouble.
andrea tasselli avatar
My tri-band filter (2 in fact), the L-ENH, shows a severely reduced transmission in Ha despite being of around 14nm wide when tested @ f/2.8. I don't want to think what would happen with a CO of 45% (tested on a lens on my side).
Robert Sahari avatar
So, as mentioned before I flock the inside of the tube of this telescope.

The built-quality of this telescope becomes apparent, if you start to disassmble it. There's completely blackened M3 hexscrews used everywhere, but the focuser which is attached with blackened M4 screws. And these are not painted screws, but chemically blackened.

First I removed the spider with the secondary mirror holder. The secondary mirror is in pristine condition and exactly 70mm x 100mm. Unfortunately the edges are not blackened, but I'll get to that later.



Next I removed the primary mirror cell, which is attached with 6 of those M3 hexscrews, instead of just four like the parts in the front of the scope. I marked it down woth painters tape and a sharpie, to know which way to reinstall it. The fit of the parts don't allow for much tilt or rotation however. All the wholes and threads line up with 0.5mm clearences. The primary mirror mask has a clearence within the tube of about 1mm.

The primary mirror cell is improved compared to the older versions of this telescope. The aperture mask has springs to hold the mirror in place (see 1) and the fit of the mirror in the cell is snug using felt liners on the inside of the three "pillars" the aperture mask gets attached to.

The counterscrews to fix the mirrorcell in place after collimation are not threaded into the aluminum, but have a stainless steel insert, which allows it to be tightened well without getting loose do to the difference in materials of screw and thread (see 2).

The mirror touches the mirror-cell itself in only three tiny spots. Sharpstar continued to use copperpins here (see 3).



Measuring the inner circumference of the tube by using a long strip of paper nd marking down where it overlaps. No calculations or guessing needed.

Draw a centerline down the tube by connecting the holes that are used to attach the front-ring and the primary mirror cell. The tube itself is 410mm long, and the front of the aperture mask within the tube is at 350mm, where I marked it all round the tube to better align the flocking paper later. Having cut the selfadhesive velour to size I did a quick testfit.



Next I removed the remaining parts from the tube. The frontring, which actually connects the tube to the spider. The finder shoe is matching the radius of the tube to perfection.

Last but not least the focuser, which has a tiltmechanism built in (see the three red circled threads). The inner tube of the focuser is baffeled, which is a nice touch.

And we're left with a completely stripped aluminum tube.



The selfadhesive velour - I use ProtoStar flocking purchased form FLO - is peeled back about a centimetre at first and carefully lined up with the centerline and the front of the tube. We then peel back the backingpaper little by little and press the flocking down onto the inside of the tube using a 40cm ruler in my case to avoid bubbles from forming. Do this slow and in little increments and the result will be a nicely flocked tube without any bubbles or wrinkles.

The difference of reflectivity to the paint of the tube becomes apparent right away.

Now we use an exactoknife to cut out the hole for the focuser and the screws and start reattaching all the parts. The focuser I installed first, which I feared would be difficult to realign. However this was very easy, as the inside of the outer tube of the focuser is exactly the same size as the hole in the tube so it was very easy to lign up the two parts again.



Some additional shots to show the difference in reflectivity before we attach the findershoe, the frontring and the primary mirror cell in it's previous position we marked down with painterstape and a sharpie line.



Before installing the spider and secondary mirror assembly we adress the edges of the secondary mirror by flocking it with the same selfadhesive velour. I simply rolled the mirror onto a piece of the flocking material which I cut to size first (220x100mm). Then I trimmed the overhanging material with an exactoknife and reinstalled it all.

I attached the dewshield once more to make a before and after comparison of the inside of the tube. Bottom middle is with the flocking material installed and the bottom right was from a few days ago without it. I think the result was absolutely worth the effort.



And the scope is back together again, ready to be stored away until September when it gets dark enough again.
Helpful