What is the colour of OIII?

Here's a broadband image I produced of Witches Broom from a couple years ago.   I think it should properly answer your question, since Veil is rich in Oiii structure.  Colors are properly calibrated.

https://www.astrobin.com/3zmrlq/B/?nc=&nce=

I think the confusion comes from the fact that although there is a lot of green in O3, many folks (including me) find too much green in astroimages to be unesthetic so it is not uncommon to increase the blue and/or decrease the green when incorporating O3 into images. Therefore many images may not be exact true color in that band.  It does depend on the object and the imager's intent to a large degree so looking at other's images  may not result in scientifically accurate colors.

But then it almost never does! 

I tend to agree with @Bill McLaughlin on this and like Bill and probably many others tend to move the OIII channel toward the more bluish side but not “all” blue.
As others stated it depends on the object and certainly the person processing the image to what their eye likes.

Shine a white light through a OIII filter, there's your answer.. Generally, the emission is teal (bluish-green) and many nebulae show green in natural color...

EXACTLY what I was going to say.  Just look through it at a white light source!  This whole discussion is the optical equivalent of arguing over how many teeth are in a horse's mouth.

John

It's blue on picture cause of Hubble palette. That why every body try to make it blue (more pleasant to the eye to IMHO) and close to what we saw during the Last 30 years.
But that false color (same for SII that is not orange/gold) OP is good on the color. But as narrowband is false color you can finally choose what you want.

Try it with OIII as magenta for example.

Generally, OIII is green. There is a second OIII line which is slightly bluer, but it’s still quite green.  If you just image OIII with an NB filter, it should look green if you care about real color.

That being said, not everyone images pure OIII. If your final picture contains a mixture of filters, then its color can be anywhere between green and cyan, especially when broadband filters are involved. The reason is that both OIII lines are in the middle of G and B filters. Depending on the BB filters you use, OIII can appear differently. BB filters used in astrophotography are not designed to faithfully reproduce the color seen by human eyes. Even Bayer array filters found on digital cameras, which are supposed to give colors close to that from human vision, can give different OIII colors. So from this point of view, I don’t think there is a standard color.

Agree with the two posts that state "it is what it is".  However, the other two posts that refer to broadband Veil images may just highlight a complexity to our perception of color.  In isolation, a single color panel may appear to be very different colors when presented within a background of another color.  And when placing a true representation of OIII next to the very deep reds of HII, such as within these Veil images will certainly push our perception of the OIII to look bluer than it really is.  Such perception color shifts are really common and occur all the time in vision.  What would be better proof would be to clip the OIII sections from these broadband images and to align them with a spectral chart to find out what they most closely approach on the spectrum.  

One such example in visual astronomy is the the wonderful and colorfully contrasting double star Albireo.  Clearly when viewed, one sees a distinctly blue star close by a red (or reddish) star.  By standards of star color/saturation, if these two were to be viewed as individual stars, most would probably not really feel that either star was particularly saturated in its color and one might even think one or both was essentially white.  Certainly the "red" star would be classed more a yellow star.

Other examples of how the human brain messes with our color perception is the many examples you can find on YouTube, etc, that clearly show one's perception can be completely flipped to seeing blue vs. red for the same color depending on background!

So if you want your image to present proper color for OIII, then I suggest that you not rely on SPCC and its attempt at using the GAIA catalog (which in my hands is so often incapable of getting perfectly correct color), you might want to isolate a small part of a color segment that you can be assured includes exclusively only OIII and then with alignment against a color chart, manually correct your image in that channel.  I'll bet that it will open a can of worms...

The wavelength of each narrowband emitter can mathematically be transformned into sRGB or AdobeRGB tripels.

I have compiled a paper regarding this transformation. In this paper, at the end, you can find all (R;G;B) values for
every relevant narrowband line. I developed that method becuase for me, there was to much personal taste in each
astro image containing narrowband data.
False color to maximize contrast between different lines, however, assigns color in a way, such, that you have a maximum of 
color difference between all involved lines. My paper explaions, how to assign natural and correct colors to the emission lines.

http://jupiter.n-t-l.de/knowledge_narrowband.htm



CS
Markus

Okay, this is what I believe. I'm open to being told I'm wrong...if people are polite.

Photons have wavelength and frequency. Colour is not a fundamental property of a photon; in fact colour is a neurophysiological / neuropsychological construct that comes about when photons hit the three (in most people) types of cone cells in a retina and are converted into electrical signals that are "interpreted" in our optical cortex. This is why people can argue about whether a colour is yellow or green, for example; we're all a bit differently "wired".

I'd say that you should make your Oiii picture in a colour that pleases your eye.

"I take pictures for me. If other people like them then too bad." I was told this by a tutor on a landscape pics course. Can't remember if the quote is word perfect or who said it. It might be a quote/misquote from Jeanloup Sieff. (If it is I don't especially like his pictures, but then that's the point; it doesn't matter to him if I like his art.

I've always thought the point of narrowband is to differentiate the signals of the different emission lines, not make true-colour images, especially when we all see colour differently. When the James Webb telescope people published first images for public view they had to work out a palette to encompass invisible IR emissions, and they came up with a spectacular image of the Tarantula Nebula. They came up with a spectacular image, and didn't discard the IR data because you just cannot see it. Same for radio astronomers ad UV and X-ray imaging; I want some one to show me what's there, even if it is part of the spectrum that's invisible to my eyes.

I realise this is a subject that arouses passion. |Please all be nice about this.

Just another note to the appearance of OIII in broadband images as light blue. (as in the Veil image above)
This is absolutely normal and expected:
The OIII line is detected by the blue and by the green channel in a proportion defined by the transmission of the B and G  filters at the wavelength of the OIII line.
The camera does not know anything about the precise wavelength of the radiation … it simply counts photons in the different channels.
The SPCC calibrates against broadband sources (stars) in a way that the ratio of the photons it detects in B and G from the OIII line gives a blue hue. It depends a bit on the transmission curves of the G and B filter.
That is probably the main reason that the OIII line is associated to a blue hue and any false color mapping (SHO, HOO) uses a blue hue for representing OIII.

If you say, well our eye works similarly and sees 500nm as green: not entirely true: the blue sensors in our eye have a sensitivity at 500nm of about 0.15 while the green sensors have a sensitivity of about 0.5, so not equal and 500nm appears pretty green. Astronomik B and G filters e.g. have a transmission of more than 90% at 500nm … both approximately equal … which gives a more bluish hue.

So … yes, if we could really see colors by eye trough a telescope, OIII would be green. But we never do. We always "see" colors through a camera according to the sensitivity/transmission of sensor/filters which translates OIII into a blue hue for our eyes … if we use broadband filters as we usually do.