I have a CDK which I collimated manually using the Ronchi eyepiece for secondary spacing and an eyepiece to center the defocused secondary shadow. I also checked this with the SKYX collimation aid which places adjustable rings to make sure the shadow is centered. This worked ok but I wonder if collimation could be improved.
I have been considering using something like the CCDInspector collimation tool or maybe the Innovations Foresight Skywave software once it becomes available. Maybe there are other programs?
In Gaston's presentation on Skywave, he indicates that often best collimation is achieved when the shadow is slightly offset from center. Is the Skywave collimation method more robust? Will it approach the results of using an interferometer and test bench?
Please comment if you have used a software tool. Is it more accurate? How would we know? Any optical engineers that can share some insight?
Thank you, Randall
I have been considering using something like the CCDInspector collimation tool or maybe the Innovations Foresight Skywave software once it becomes available. Maybe there are other programs?
In Gaston's presentation on Skywave, he indicates that often best collimation is achieved when the shadow is slightly offset from center. Is the Skywave collimation method more robust? Will it approach the results of using an interferometer and test bench?
Please comment if you have used a software tool. Is it more accurate? How would we know? Any optical engineers that can share some insight?
Thank you, Randall





