What is going on With Graxpert?

Tony Gondola:
So there isn't a log file at the path location given in the error message?

There is, but it's hidden. The thing I don't understand is how to process a file in Graxpert like this. Every time I try to denoise or remove any gradient, the error is still there. These two issues are ruining the astrophotos you took. There's got to be a way to fix the error, right? Like, remove the log file or the data from the log file? I tried two different solutions: reinstalling Graxpert and re-processing the image, but it didn't work. Any idea how to overcome this?

Tony Gondola:

Szijártó Áron:

Tony Gondola:
So there isn't a log file at the path location given in the error message?

There is, but it's hidden. The thing I don't understand is how to process a file in Graxpert like this. Every time I try to denoise or remove any gradient, the error is still there. These two issues are ruining the astrophotos you took. There's got to be a way to fix the error, right? Like, remove the log file or the data from the log file? I tried two different solutions: reinstalling Graxpert and re-processing the image, but it didn't work. Any idea how to overcome this?

I have no idea. I would have tried everything you have. Remove the program completely and do a fresh install, that sort of thing. Also, what file format are you feeding it? Have you tried different formats or file sizes? Sort of that. I think this is a question for the developers. Have you contacted them?

I usually process fit files in Graxpert. Right now, I did a tiff file one, which is not even processed. Are there any files that Graxpert can't process? Like JPG or maybe Tiff? If so, then I don't need to contact the devs because it is kinda of obvious.

Tony Gondola:
Not sure why you'd ever want to feed it a jpg. I usually work with 16-bit fits and TIF files without any issues with input or output.

So, any fit or TTF files would work?  I currently have an autosaved tiff that has 20-second exposure times of the comet Tsuchinshan Atlas. I did it in Deep Sky Stacker, and since u can't process 20-second exposure frames in Siril, I had no choice but to stick to it. What I noticed before was that Graxpert worked just fine with the saved picture file I did from Deep Sky Stacker. So I don't know if the files would be the case. But if so, then I don't need to get into contact with the devs.

Tony Gondola:
Why can't you process 20 sec? Sub-exposures in Siril?

I don't know I just had that thought.
But because the file I tried progress was wrong or something. When I did that, I saved manually a bunch of images that I converted into Tiff, but Siril failed to stack them.