I see a lot of posts where someone has less than perfect stars in a corner. The usual answer is that it's tilt so I'm trying to understand this better. In thinking it through, I would expect that in a simple optical system, meaning no reducers or correctors, anything that demands exact back spacing, the effect would be stars gradually going out of focus in the direction of the tilt, both positive and negative. It seems that the tilt would have to be really extreme to cause stars to be elongated to noticeable degree. Is that a reasonable assumption?
Tilt, field centering or collimation.
Well Written Insightful Respectful Engaging
I don't think so. Unless you have a flat image plane which is rather hard to come by.
So what would the appearance be? I'd really like to understand this.
They are all going to be different depending of the specific of the "simple" optical system, assuming "simple" being one without field correctors. E.g. newtonians would show coma in addition to tilt, with coma being the more preponderant the further out in the FOV you look and nil at the optical center, since tilt is constant throughout and newtonians are reasonably flat field instruments, at least for small angles.
Insightful
I shoot with a Newtonian and of course, coma is expected the further off axis you go. I suppose if collimation is confirmed and I see a difference in the corners then tilt would be the reason?
In the real world you can't reliably diagnose tilt from a single image. Differing optical designs display out of focus stars off axis in different ways.
The easiest way to figure out if your sensor is tilted is to frame two stars in opposite corners of the field and manually identify if they have differing focus positions.
The easiest way to figure out if your sensor is tilted is to frame two stars in opposite corners of the field and manually identify if they have differing focus positions.
Well Written Helpful Insightful Concise
Tony Gondola:
I shoot with a Newtonian and of course, coma is expected the further off axis you go. I suppose if collimation is confirmed and I see a difference in the corners then tilt would be the reason?
*Most likely, assuming an otherwise perfect optical system.
Seems that it really is a process of elimination and it might very well be caused by a combination of factors depending on the complexity of the system and the state of the optics.
Question about Wanderer ETA and multi-night registration
Hi everyone, I don’t have the WandererAstro ETA (Electronic Tilt Adjuster) yet, but I’m seriously considering it and I’ve been thinking about a possible side effect. As far as I understand, the ETA adjusts each corner of the sensor independently. Thi...
Discusses electronic tilt adjustment, directly relevant to understanding tilt effects.
Star test, need help interpred the result
Can someone help me interpred this star test? I struggle to find a good source explaining exactly what this means for my specific mirror. If this star test is even good enough to actually get something out of it. It doesn’t look to good, so I’m not e...
Star test interpretation helps diagnose optical issues like tilt-induced defocus.
Possible RASA 8 Mirror Shift Issues on Long Exposures
Hello all RASA users! I recently bought a RASA 8 that had been in use for several years. After the first tests I didn’t notice any problems, but when I moved to 15-minute exposures, the stars turned into streaks. It feels like the guide scope is not ...
Mirror shift issues cause similar corner star degradation problems as tilt.
OOUK ODK10 mirror spacing & corrector placement
Hello, I acquired an ODK10 from an German Observatory for a very good price and received it today. It’s used and has seen better days, but I want to see if I can make it work. Mechanically it looks OK and the Observatory fixed the weird unstable cork...
Mirror spacing and corrector placement affect focus and tilt-related problems.