Any idea what's caused this?

13 replies329 views
Piers Palmer avatar
I shot M74 last night and having processed the frames, have something that looks like amp glow. I know it can't be; my camera is an ASI2600MC Pro, but I can't work out what it is. 

It was taken through a Vixen SD115, so I can't imagine there were any light leaks and even if there were, wouldn't the brightness spread around as the scope tracked? I've checked the individual frames using Blink in Pixinsight and no visible issues there. 

Maybe there was a supernova just out of frame and I missed it? How exciting!

Well Written Engaging
Wei-Hao Wang avatar
reflection from a nearby bright star.
Scott Badger avatar
I agree it’s probably a star. Had the same issue when I shot M109 and it was challenging to process out. I ended up swapping pixels from another part of the background.

Cheers,
Scott
Well Written Concise
Die Launische Diva avatar
Maybe the star η Psc (Alpherg)? It has a magnitude of 3.8. Isn't it too far from your FOV to cause such a damage?
Piers Palmer avatar
Thanks all - I was just checking Telescopius and yes, that's the nearest star, but at magnitude 3.8 I'm surprised it has that much impact!
Brian Puhl avatar
As previously stated, it's an out of frame star.   

It's likely caused by using 36mm filters on your APS-C camera.      It's a known thing.    Basically that star hit the edge of your filters/masks and is bouncing directly at your sensor.    The solution is either getting better filter masks, or painting the ones you have with a blacker paint.  

As a band-aid, you can reframe your subject so the star does not hit that very edge, but this issue will plague you until you fix it.
Helpful Concise
Brian Diaz avatar
maybe some external light  check around you telescope site
 one image side  (  left or right side of sensor  ) , mmm , for me come for outside


CS,BRIAN
Piers Palmer avatar
Brian Puhl:
t's likely caused by using 36mm filters on your APS-C camera.      It's a known thing.    Basically that star hit the edge of your filters/masks and is bouncing directly at your sensor.


Thanks - that makes sense other than I wasn't using any filters; just the normal spacing rings I've used on scores of occasions. I shall investigate further. 
Brian Diaz:
maybe some external light  check around you telescope site


There is a street light directly behind, but it's not shining directly into the garden and it's never interfered before; it's my usual shooting place. All other lights were turned off. Wouldn't that show a broader area of pollution too, rather than from what looks like a specific point?

I bet the James Webb doesn't have these problems.
Brian Puhl avatar
Piers Palmer:
Brian Puhl:
t's likely caused by using 36mm filters on your APS-C camera.      It's a known thing.    Basically that star hit the edge of your filters/masks and is bouncing directly at your sensor.


Thanks - that makes sense other than I wasn't using any filters; just the normal spacing rings I've used on scores of occasions. I shall investigate further.



What do you mean you weren't using any filters?  Not even a UV/iR???      I did misread a bit tho, not realizing this was OSC, but I think you understand, it's still going to be something very near the camera bouncing that stray light at the sensor.       The easiest way I've found to locate these issues is to simply shine a light down the OTA tube from the objective end, the reflective areas will stand out with a glare.
l'AstroVan avatar
Hi,

​​​​​I think the bright star is Éta Piscium
Piers Palmer avatar
Brian Puhl:
Not even a UV/iR???


Only the window that covers the sensor; is that a cut filter? Nothing else. I'll check as you suggest though!
Piers Palmer avatar
l'AstroVan:
Hi,

​​​​​I think the bright star is Éta Piscium

I think it must have been that, but it's going to be clear tonight again so I might try again and reframe it to include that star. I'll keep everything else the same.
Piers Palmer avatar
I shot from exactly the same location last night - everything was the same, other than the target, but it was in the same rough direction.



No similar artefact in this one, so I guess it must have been the nearby star!
Thomas Groh avatar
I had this with moon-light, but it could also any lamp nearby.
Related discussions
Vignetting I have not seen before....
I am seeing some vignetting issues I have not experienced before. I was shooting some test shots on my lightweight rig - Samyang 135mm and ASI2600MM. Shooting in Oiii. The raw frame - autostretched: The raw frame Boosted Auto Stretch: I redid my flat...
Jul 30, 2024
Both posts describe astrophotographers troubleshooting unexpected image artifacts they're encountering with their ASI2600 cameras during deep-sky imaging sessions.
Flats wrong orientation during calibration creating dust motes?
I have run into this very bizarre flat calibration issue in Pixinsight. Just some background, I imaged a target with my Luminance filter on my 6200mm pro last night, 60s each frame, for a total of 250 frames, at gain 100, default ASIair offset (50), ...
Feb 14, 2024
Both posts describe astrophotographers troubleshooting technical issues they encountered while processing images captured with ASI cameras during their recent imaging sessions.
Should I drizzle? What are the disadvantages of doing so needlessly?
I understand the basic idea of drizzle. And I know that one of the "requirements" is that you be undersampled. For the large majority using small refractors and average sized pixels, drizzle is just a thing that is always done regardless of...
Feb 18, 2024
Both posts discuss technical challenges in astrophotography processing and image optimization.
Sharing data for knowledge exchange and discussion
Recently someone posted a topic to ask about safe sources to download data to practice processing. As a new astrophotographer I am getting a lot from this forum and sadly cannot (yet) contribute much so I came up with this idea to give something back...
Nov 11, 2023
Both posts involve astrophotographers seeking community input and collaboration regarding their imaging work and data processing challenges.