Playerone vs. ToupTek IMX533 Color

3 replies•143 views
FilippoTib avatar
Hello everyone!
I recently started to consider upgrading my camera and moving from my canon2000d (astromodified) to a camera with a 533 color sensor.


Looking around the classic alternatives are ZWO, PlayerOne and Touptek.

I would have ruled out the ZWO: higher price, I am not going to work with ASI Air and exclusive rear hub for ZWO accessories. On the last point I am not 100% sure but in any case it costs more than all the others.

I was leaning mainly toward the PlayerOne since on the quality level it seems really incredible. Recently, however, I saw that, at my local dealer, the ToupTek is also on sale for about 250 euros less than the PlayerOne .

What scares me about the touptek is mainly the absence of detailed documentation, reviews and information online. For example just to find the unity gain is already challenging.

In your opinion, does it make sense to invest that extra 250 euros to make sure everything runs smoothly?

Separate question for those who have switched from APSc to the square sensor of the 533: do you feel the sensor reduction so much? I almost see it as a benefit, but online you read all kinds of things!

Thank you very much!
C.S.
F.
Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
I got a Touptek, well, actually an Altair which essentially are Touptek rebranded or so I'm told. The only point I see in paying extra is if they incorporate a tilt adjuster which can be actually used in the field (and that discounts ZWO). So, if you are prepared to shim and tweak then I'll go for the lowest costing one or otherwise is the PlayerOne.
andrea tasselli avatar
As for the 2nd question, if it fits the required FOV is all good.
FilippoTib avatar
andrea tasselli:
I got a Touptek, well, actually an Altair which essentially are Touptek rebranded or so I'm told. The only point I see in paying extra is if they incorporate a tilt adjuster which can be actually used in the field (and that discounts ZWO). So, if you are prepared to shim and tweak then I'll go for the lowest costing one or otherwise is the PlayerOne.

Hi, thank you very much for your reply!
Yes indeed the playerone mounts the sensor tilter plate, although frontally and not at the rear, while the touptek does not seem to have this feature.

I was concerned about the lack of documentation, but actually, if you are willing to spend a little extra time on it, it shouldn't be a problem. I hope...

On the tilter I hadn't thought about that, it's probably a big selling point for the playerone....

Thank you very much again!
CS
F
Related discussions
Custom M54 tilt adapter to suit QHY CFW3M-SR & OAG-M system, fits within 55mm BF - Design Files Included!
Hello all. I have a QHY 294M-Pro, CFW3M-SR, and OAG-M fitted to my Vixen R200SS newt. I have been battling tilt with my 294M ever since I bought it, and have been stumped by the lack of suitable tilt adjusters available on the market (especially in M...
Both posts discuss challenges in selecting and acquiring specialized astronomy camera equipment and accessories for astrophotography.
Jan 1, 2025