Weird "star" on only 1 5-min Ha acquisition

15 replies822 views
Jure Menart avatar
Dear forum,

I did first light on my new refractor (Takahashi FSQ-106edx4, camera ZWO asi294mm, Baader Ha 7nm filter). I have a lot of issues still (late nights, a lot of other things) with focuser and also auto-guiding, so no final image yet But first few images were 5-minute subs with hydrogen alpha on Pelican Nebula.

I am quite happy with them (not other filters and full project yet, quite defocused etc etc ). But I am wondering if forum would know what is happening on 2nd sub. There is additional star that is not there on 1st, 3rd or any other out of 18 frames I did in that hour and half:


I hope it is visible, it stuck out quite obviously when I did blink in PixInsight. One can see normal satellite trails but this star is there only for 1 5-minute sub. Any idea what could it be?

Zoomed in picture shows the star is a little bit deformed (in the frame with other lower bright star for comparison):
Sean Mc avatar
I’ll throw out a guess…. Aliens. 

or… maybe a geo sat that just happened to flare at that time?  I’m guessing it flared for shorter than 5 minutes, which gave it that funny shape.
Scott Badger avatar
Could be a meteor moving straight towards you. So, no visible trail, just a bright spot that appears for a couple seconds and then fades.

Cheers,
Scott
Well Written Insightful Respectful Concise
Oscar avatar
a random splatter of hot/cold pixels maybe
Jure Menart avatar
Sean Mc:
I’ll throw out a guess…. Aliens. 

or… maybe a geo sat that just happened to flare at that time?  I’m guessing it flared for shorter than 5 minutes, which gave it that funny shape.

Hi Sean,

I was thinking the same - it could be geo satellite, it's still weird to flash only once - but for me it's most plausible explanation at this moment
Jure Menart avatar
Scott Badger:
Could be a meteor moving straight towards you. So, no visible trail, just a bright spot that appears for a couple seconds and then fades.

Cheers,
Scott

Hi Scott,

Maybe. But that would be reeeeeally weird a? But it's one of the possibilities of course
Jure Menart avatar
a random splatter of hot/cold pixels maybe

Hi messierman,

Maybe. But would be really weird to have so many temporary hot/cold pixels grouped together I think...
Scott Badger avatar
Jure Menart:
Hi Scott,

Maybe. But that would be reeeeeally weird a? But it's one of the possibilities of course

I've seen meteors in that way 3 or 4 times. The last time was just last week. I looked up and and saw what appeared to be a planet, but brighter than Venus, a little redder than Mars, and where there shouldn't be a planet (near Polaris). It didn't move and was visible for a few seconds then quickly faded away.

Cheers,
Scott
Well Written
TiffsAndAstro avatar
No idea but it looks square compared to your other stars
Jure Menart avatar
TiffsAndAstro:
No idea but it looks square compared to your other stars

Yeah it indeed does interesting and puzzling
Jure Menart avatar
Scott Badger:
I've seen meteors in that way 3 or 4 times. The last time was just last week. I looked up and and saw what appeared to be a planet, but brighter than Venus, a little redder than Mars, and where there shouldn't be a planet (near Polaris). It didn't move and was visible for a few seconds then quickly faded away.

Cheers,
Scott

Hi Scott,

Yeah it seems this is the most logical explanation. Funny though to have such a direct path Thanks for your comments!
John Hayes avatar
For some reason, CMOS sensors are not as susceptible to cosmic rays as CCD sensors; however, it's still possible to catch one every once in a while.  Depending on the angle of incidence a cosmic ray can produce all kinds of interesting patterns.  I don't know exactly what this is but I wouldn't rule out the possibility that it's due to a high energy particle.  I used to see stuff like this all the time with my 16803 based cameras.

John
Well Written Insightful Respectful Concise
Josh Walawender avatar
I think John is on the right track with a cosmic ray, that was my first thought.  Is the image you showed raw, or was it processed in any way?  A cosmic ray would typically have sharp edges, but processing steps such as shifting or rotating the image in preparation for stacking can re-bin the pixels and smooth the edges.

A geosynchronous satellite would trail over time (of order 15 arcseconds per second), so the flare would have to be very short lived to produce a point source.

-Josh
Well Written Helpful Insightful Concise Engaging
Sean Mc avatar
Aren’t geo sats supposed to be stationary?

cosmic ray sounds plausible too.
Jure Menart avatar
Josh Walawender:
I think John is on the right track with a cosmic ray, that was my first thought.  Is the image you showed raw, or was it processed in any way?  A cosmic ray would typically have sharp edges, but processing steps such as shifting or rotating the image in preparation for stacking can re-bin the pixels and smooth the edges.

A geosynchronous satellite would trail over time (of order 15 arcseconds per second), so the flare would have to be very short lived to produce a point source.

-Josh

The images I showed aren't heavily processed - I stretched them and convert them to JPEG just for me easier to add pointing finger.
gfunkernator avatar
I posted a new topic about this but was redirected here as I too have a weird "flash" of light in only one sub of the lagoon.  This sub is only 90" by the way.