Remote Imaging - which mini-pc

Byron MillerChris White- Overcast ObservatoryJerry GerberBill McLaughlin
32 replies1.3k views
Leonardo Landi avatar
Hi everyone. I apologize if the topic has already been discussed in the past, but I haven't found any recent posts on it and given that mini-PCs evolve quickly I think it's not wrong to open a new post. 
I'm thinking of buying a new PC for my remote setup. At the beginning I thought of using my Eagle 4 (basic version) but some considerations made me think:
- My Eagle is already three years old, and it is not excluded that sooner or later it will break down
- It's pretty heavy
- With the PC installed on the OTA, I should go up with an ethernet cable because remotely I prefer the wired connection to wifi
- At the same time, I need a ground USB hub to connect to the roll-off roof, the weather station and the MGPBox, and my mount does not have USB ports.
So, ultimately, I would have to go up to the Eagle with three cables: power, ethernet and USB.

By installing a mini-PC on the column, and a Pegasus Power box Advance on the optics, I could go up with only two cables: power and USB. I would also reduce weight and vibration on the OTA, which isn't bad.
So I would like some advice on what to choose. Many YouTubers use the Mele Quieter 4, which however is fanless. For me this is not essential, but I would prefer it to run on 12v. Obviously it must be able to turn on via smart plug when power is restored. So is Mele a good choice? Or could we find something better if we could have the fan?

Below I put a diagram of the setup and how the cable management should be

Helpful Engaging
Nick Grundy avatar
if you aren't going to mount it on the OTA, do you need the PC to run in 12v still? I only ask because most of the mini pc's that have better performance use a 19v AD/DC adapter. Do you even need it to be actual mini PC? (you could get something more robust if not)

I use a powerbox on the OTA and run USB3+12v power up to there. (2 cables) I've been using this Beelink SER5 and it's been great. (any lag on the remote PC drives me nuts)

https://www.bee-link.com/collections/mini-pc?sort_by=price-descending
Leonardo Landi avatar
Thank you Nick. You're right, I could use a 19v mini-pc or even  a 220v-powered laptop. I only need a +1 smart plug to turn it on-off regardless of the pegasus' 12V power supply. I'll have a look at your mini-pc. Nice wahoo in your pic BTWsmile
Byron Miller avatar
I don't do anything but run imaging on my remote pc, so the Beelink mini S12 N100 works fine..  perpetually on sale on amazon.  16gb ram and 512gb nvme, i put a 2tb ssd in for camera storage and it does well.. only about 7-11w draw
Helpful
Quinn Groessl avatar
I love my Beelink mini pcs. Super affordable. Runs NINA, PHD2, and Pegasus software all through the night with no issues. Sharpcap slows it down a bit, but I hardly ever use it. If I used Sharpcap more I'd probably get one with a Ryzen CPU. Right now on Amazon, there's a bunch on a bit of a sale. It's a regular 12v power cord so it's easy to use with my Pegasus Powerbox. One of them that I got is $170 at the moment. It's the BEELINK MINI S12 16G/500G/N100
Helpful Concise
Chris White- Overcast Observatory avatar
I'm getting ready to send my gear or a remote deployment….  I settled on a big NUC with cooling fans and lots of Ram, processor power, etc…    The PC is not mounted to the OTA. I have a powerbox on the OTA so I just have 2 cables running onto the mount.  Depending on where you are deploying, consider ambient temperature.  The mini PC's that are fanless and people mount on the scope will suffer in the heat and the processor will throttle back to prevent overheating.  My NUC is not one of the mini NUC's, it's pretty big.    It's got a large hard drive, multiple fans and can run programs like PI, etc… 

My recommendation is to always keep the PC off the OTA.
Helpful
Kevin Morefield avatar
This is the same decision I made and for the same reasons.  I went with an Intel i7 NUC with 32 gigs of ram and 2TB SSD.  This gives me room to store a decent amount of files and do some minimal processing remotely if needed.  It also handles the large IMX455 files without issue.  

Kevin
Jerry Gerber avatar
I too am setting up at a remote site.   I purchased the MeLe fanless mini PC with 16GB of DDR4 RAM and 512 GB SSD drive.  https://store.mele.cn/collections/mini-pc/products/mele-quieter-3c-fanless-mini-pc-n5105-small-computer-portable-ddr4-windows11-hdmi-4k-wi-fi-6-gigabit-ethernet-bt-5-2-usb-3-2-3-type-c-dp-sd-card-ssd-support-vesa-mount?variant=42542909554866

It's very lightweight, would it be better to mount it below the Powerbox on the scope, or better to have it on the rack next to the pier?

The temperature inside the observatory gets pretty warm, it's in SW New Mexico.  

Thanks!
Jerry
Well Written Engaging
Dunk avatar
If you are happy with mounting the PC on your pier (or even just on the floor next to the pier), then the world is your oyster: there is zero reason to compromise on a mini-pc/NUC or pay the extra expense of an Eagle, when you can run a full-sized PC which will give you a lot more grunt for things like live-stacking and can be built from off-the-shelf components, upgraded over time, have loads of USB ports etc.

So yeah, I'd say full-size PC on the pier, powerbox on the OTA and you are good to go.
Helpful Concise Engaging Supportive
AstroShed avatar
I use the Mele 4c Overclock, 32gb version and it’s been flawless, and I had the 3c Overclock before this one, see my YT review here..

https://youtu.be/6QayJnl9-zQ?si=1kcS2J2k5SmMshzX
Mickael Coulon avatar
Hi ! 
We use a mele Quieter 3c with a Pegasus box. Our remote host advices us to use a fanless computer 

Everything works perfectly since a year now smile 
​​​​​
Huib Wouters avatar
Mele 4C is plenty powerful enough to run your remote setup. I run a stripped down Linux distro on an old Mele2 (16GB RAM, 1TB SSD), and even get acceptable framerates for planetary imaging. For deep sky imaging it's plenty plenty fast. As long as you don't do your image processing on your mini PC, there's no need for a faster PC.

Reason I choose the Mele (your situation may be different) is that it runs on 12V, as does the rest of my setup, so I can connect everything to a battery when travelling. Fanless was also a must for me, less vibration on the OTA, less noise (even the fan of my cooled camera is tuned down to 40%).
Helpful Insightful Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive
Jim Raskett avatar
AstroShed:
I use the Mele 4c Overclock, 32gb version and it’s been flawless, and I had the 3c Overclock before this one, see my YT review here..

https://youtu.be/6QayJnl9-zQ?si=1kcS2J2k5SmMshzX

I have used a Mele Overclock 3C for about a year and it does everything I need. 
I watched your video and saw that you also cloned the NVME (I had a 512Gb laying around) to the into EMMC storage.
I has performed great for me.
i have it velcro’ed  to my mount.

Jim
AstroShed avatar
Jim Raskett:
AstroShed:
I use the Mele 4c Overclock, 32gb version and it’s been flawless, and I had the 3c Overclock before this one, see my YT review here..

https://youtu.be/6QayJnl9-zQ?si=1kcS2J2k5SmMshzX

I have used a Mele Overclock 3C for about a year and it does everything I need. 
I watched your video and saw that you also cloned the NVME (I had a 512Gb laying around) to the into EMMC storage.
I has performed great for me.
i have it velcro’ed  to my mount.

Jim

Nice to hear you watched the video…appreciated and glad you found it useful 👍🏻
Chris White- Overcast Observatory avatar
I think it's important to distinguish between a remote setup, and a backyard setup.  I've run minux and mele for years in my backyard.  They are certainly more then adequate to handle the software I use for capture.  However, remote setups may have different requirements.  Are you looking to be able to run analysis tools like ASTAP Hyperbolic Curve analysis, or NINA HF?  When running programs like these, the mini computers really struggle especially in the heat. I noticed a massive performance difference between Vermont winters and summers… and my summers are not nearly as hot as many of the more popular remote destinations.  We're talking minutes to run hyperbolic curve analysis with IMX455 vs seconds when compared to a "real" computer. 

Also, depending on where you are going to locate your setup, internet connections may be slow and transferring large datasets very time consuming. Having the ability to preprocess on site with pixinsight can be very helpful and you're just not going to do this with a mini-pc. 

You will get all sorts of opinions on this topic, but that's because there are so many unique needs and use-cases.  I have a drawer full of mini PC's (minux, beelink, mele) and ultimately, I ended up spending a grand to get a real computer that could handle my current remote needs as well as unanticipated or future needs.  Like precise parts adapters, I seem to have a fortune spent and lost on mini-pc's….   For the backyard or for the nomadic imager a mini pc offers a tremendous value.  For a more robust remote deployment PC in harsh environments… I'd seriously consider looking elsewhere.  If you have a site with good tech support, maybe this isnt as big of an issue.  If you have to drive 300 miles to visit and service your own observatory, reliability is perhaps more important.  Either way, my mini-pc days are behind me.  Like everything, you get what you pay for.  Scopes, mounts, cameras, etc….
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Bill McLaughlin avatar
I know that most folks these days use the minis but I am not a fan of mini PCs myself. They are too limited. Self-made desktop PC with lots of power and a Powerbox to control power and USB are all I would ever run, at least for a permanent observatory. Minis are probably better for portable just due to size.
Huib Wouters avatar
Chris White- Overcast Observatory:
I think it's important to distinguish between a remote setup, and a backyard setup.  I've run minux and mele for years in my backyard.  They are certainly more then adequate to handle the software I use for capture.  However, remote setups may have different requirements.  Are you looking to be able to run analysis tools like ASTAP Hyperbolic Curve analysis, or NINA HF?  When running programs like these, the mini computers really struggle especially in the heat. I noticed a massive performance difference between Vermont winters and summers... and my summers are not nearly as hot as many of the more popular remote destinations.  We're talking minutes to run hyperbolic curve analysis with IMX455 vs seconds when compared to a "real" computer. 

Also, depending on where you are going to locate your setup, internet connections may be slow and transferring large datasets very time consuming. Having the ability to preprocess on site with pixinsight can be very helpful and you're just not going to do this with a mini-pc. 

You will get all sorts of opinions on this topic, but that's because there are so many unique needs and use-cases.  I have a drawer full of mini PC's (minux, beelink, mele) and ultimately, I ended up spending a grand to get a real computer that could handle my current remote needs as well as unanticipated or future needs.  Like precise parts adapters, I seem to have a fortune spent and lost on mini-pc's....   For the backyard or for the nomadic imager a mini pc offers a tremendous value.  For a more robust remote deployment PC in harsh environments... I'd seriously consider looking elsewhere.  If you have a site with good tech support, maybe this isnt as big of an issue.  If you have to drive 300 miles to visit and service your own observatory, reliability is perhaps more important.  Either way, my mini-pc days are behind me.  Like everything, you get what you pay for.  Scopes, mounts, cameras, etc....

I was a big fan of my Mele Quieter2Q mini pc, until this morning I realised that I loose 6% of imaging time because of calculations done in between frames (HFR etc.). With the very limited dark and clear sky time here, upgrading the PC iis probably more photons/euro than upgrading to a faster scope. The old Quieter2 still does the job though
Bill McLaughlin avatar
I think it's important to distinguish between a remote setup, and a backyard setup.  I've run minux and mele for years in my backyard.  They are certainly more then adequate to handle the software I use for capture.  However, remote setups may have different requirements.  Are you looking to be able to run analysis tools like ASTAP Hyperbolic Curve analysis, or NINA HF?  When running programs like these, the mini computers really struggle especially in the heat. I noticed a massive performance difference between Vermont winters and summers... and my summers are not nearly as hot as many of the more popular remote destinations.  We're talking minutes to run hyperbolic curve analysis with IMX455 vs seconds when compared to a "real" computer.


Certainly a factor. Also with remote sites one will often want to preprocess some of the frames (especially calibration frames) on the remote site PC so as to avoid downloading hundreds of frames and mini's do not do well with that. I just did that this AM in fact. Mine is a 12th gen i5 desktop with a high end over clockers cooler (it gets hot at the site this time of year) and tons of M.2 storage.
Ashraf AbuSara avatar
Not sure what mount you are using, but I recently got the Pegasus Saddle power box and it works great with the AM5, and is compatible with many mounts. You would put the Mini PC on the OTA, and the powr box is now the saddle. All you have to do is connect power to the Saddle, so that will be the only moving part. You can have your mini PC on the OTA connected to the Pegasus saddle and it has a USB hub on it an power distribution. It is a little pricy but has the humidity/ temp monitor built in.

https://pegasusastro.com/products/saddle-powerbox/

I have used the MeleQ3 fanless and the MeleQ4c with a fan and both are great. I will say the fanless design is far lighter than the overclock version, so if weight is an issue, get the fanless version.
Helpful
Jerry Gerber avatar
After reading all the replies here I see there are definitely advantages and disadvantages of both the mini pc and a desktop.

For my new remote setup I chose a mini PC with 16gb ram and 512 GB SSD storage, with a Celeron processor. 

​​​​​​Chris Fellows, the tech chief at the remote site wrote the following:

There are pros/cons of both choices
MiniPros

  • Can be installed on top of the DEC axis - Greatly reduces the chance of snags
  • Low power consumption - Will stay up longer on UPS in case of a power loss
  • Costs - Normally lower price point

Cons
  • Compute power - Typically not as powerful as a standard PC
  • Expandability/upgradeability - Typically wont have as many or any expansion slots


DesktopPros
  • More powerful compute power (this is important if you are going to pre-process your data prior to transfer)
  • Expandable/Upgradeable - If you need more power just add it

Cons
  • Must be installed below the RA axis - If you don't have through the mount cable management capabilities this is a big deal in a remote setup
  • High power consumption - Wont stay up as long on UPS
  • Cost - Typically higher price point
  • Not fanless - System will get dirty/dusty due to the air flow through the system


If you plan to preprocess your data before transmitting it out of DSPR then the desktop is the better solution. You can install a large HD and write all your subframes to the PC and install your processing software (Pixinsight or whatever). Then all you need to transfer are the stacks and not hundreds of raw subframes.
But! The cable management can be very difficult with a PC installed below the DEC axis. A mini PC can be installed on top of the OTA (with an appropriate bracket) and all cable except power can be kept on top of the kit. This avoids snagging issues that can plague remote setups.



I'm going to start with the mini PC and see how it goes. If I find any serious issues with it I'll replace it immediately with a more powerful desktop PC. 

Live and learn! 

Jerry
Helpful
Byron Miller avatar
My little N100 runs TheSkyX,  Nina, Roof Control, Weather, ascom safety, OneDrive (it's how everything syncs back home), Astap, PHD2 and its dealing with frames from a 6200 

I used to use a full-blown PC, but dust and especially bugs were problematic for anything that needs forced air cooling.

Beelink's using NVME for OS helps drastically with general performance for astro imaging and I just have a 2tb SSD that is the image drive to sync
Chris White- Overcast Observatory avatar
Byron Miller:
My little N100 runs TheSkyX,  Nina, Roof Control, Weather, ascom safety, OneDrive (it's how everything syncs back home), Astap, PHD2 and its dealing with frames from a 6200 

I used to use a full-blown PC, but dust and especially bugs were problematic for anything that needs forced air cooling.

Beelink's using NVME for OS helps drastically with general performance for astro imaging and I just have a 2tb SSD that is the image drive to sync



I wonder if putting a coarse screen around the vents on a PC would help.  Not small enough to restrict airflow but keep bugs out.  Wouldnt help with dust....

Also, might be more location specific of a problem to consider.  I'll be shipping my gear in a few weeks so last minute tweaks are happenin'.
Byron Miller avatar
Chris White- Overcast Observatory:
Byron Miller:
My little N100 runs TheSkyX,  Nina, Roof Control, Weather, ascom safety, OneDrive (it's how everything syncs back home), Astap, PHD2 and its dealing with frames from a 6200 

I used to use a full-blown PC, but dust and especially bugs were problematic for anything that needs forced air cooling.

Beelink's using NVME for OS helps drastically with general performance for astro imaging and I just have a 2tb SSD that is the image drive to sync



I wonder if putting a coarse screen around the vents on a PC would help.  Not small enough to restrict airflow but keep bugs out.  Wouldnt help with dust....

Also, might be more location specific of a problem to consider.  I'll be shipping my gear in a few weeks so last minute tweaks are happenin'.

I put my money i was spending on an observatory pc for performance into just making a beastly threadripper at home.

The only time I needed a beefy PC was one remote obs that used satellite internet and daily syncing got throttled but I just chose to find a place with gigabit since I don't want any data isolated from me since there will be an inevitable catastrophic loss of something exposed to the elements nightly.

If it means spending 176 bucks for the next generation model of a beelink PC every 2 years, then that's a lot less hassle than trying to proof up a PC that demands a lot more cooling, a lot more power and a lot more moving parts that can and will go wrong.

CPU Thermal paste? that will rot out and wear out in less than a year.
CPU fans? bugs, dirts and critters that make NESTS love those fins and will move in
PSU fans? dust suckers and dust blowers 
Case fans - ditto

With having gigabit internet, I can live stack remotely to see how things are going and its only delayed by a few seconds.  I also use tailscale, so heavier uses of the skyx such as exploring it like a planetarium software, i just have my miniPC reference my workstation PC as the planetarium over the tailnet 

oh, and as someone mentioned before, my UPS runtime with the N100 beelink is half a day for 160 bucks... it's weathered every storm and power loss without shutting down once where a full blown PC would have gone down in 5 minutes... and this power is shared with my roof controller, network/switch/router and the roof motor so i have plenty of power to always be within safety limits of whatever is necessary to react to any safety change.

i used to keep old laptops for this purpose but i find SBC's just do a lot better since laptops still have forced air and thermal paste and stuff like that
Chris White- Overcast Observatory avatar
I think DSP is using starlink (Jerry mentioned this site above) and so are a few other places that I looked into.  I ended up going with HCRO, which has high speed.  Good point on the UPS.  HCRO has generators that turn on pretty instantly, so UPS needs there are minimal. But not every site offers that.
Byron Miller avatar
all things considered, the experience of doing PixInsight, Siril and photoshop over RDP just stinks too, so +1 for local PC connected via tailnet so it all "feels local"