Chance to spend a couple of nights in Bortle 1/2; what's best to focus on?

16 replies489 views
Rostokko avatar
My backyard is in a Bortle 6+ area; I will be on a bicycling trip at the end of the month in a nice, rural, Bortle 1 or 2 area - at an elevation of 2/3,000ft.
Of course I'm thinking of driving there with my equipment, betting on one or two good weather nights; but, considering the limited time I will have, I was wondering whether I should focus on galaxies or nebula. Which category will gain more quality in a low Bortle area compared to where I live?
If it affects the answer, I have an 8" SCT, either configured at full FL (typically for galaxies), or with Hyperstar (typically for nebula, or large galaxies).
Well Written Insightful Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
Broadband imaging, whether galaxies or diffuse galactic cirrus/dust/IFN is up to your preferences. I'd plump for the latter since B6/B6+ skies aren't that prohibitive for galaxies in my experience.
Oscar avatar
I would use the Hyperstar and go after some dark nebulae
Rostokko avatar
Thanks guys.
Marc V avatar
Dark nebulae here as well… from my Bortle 9 sky, I just dream about them …
Gilmour Dickson avatar
I would go hyperstar and go for dark/reflection nebula.  In other words targets that really benefit from dark skies.  Narrowband and galaxies I would not focus on.  What is the location?
Rostokko avatar
It will be in the Adirondacks, northern NY state.
Focusing on one or two dark nebula makes perfect sense; and using Hyperstar (f/2) does allow me to grab lots of short exposures.
Tim Hawkes avatar
Whenever I have been lucky enough to be in a similar situation (in my case from B7 at home to about B3 on vacation)  what I could image while away was still limited by  the weather.  So the imaging decision came down to sky position and  if the weather would hold out for long enough to finish anything off.  So I went for the galaxies in order to image their outer fainter forms so as to later combine these data  with images of the core taken from home. If I had thought about I also would have gone for some OIII narrowband of some of the fainter more interesting nebulae since that too is quite limited by LP.  Tim
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Rostokko avatar
While being able to capture the fainter parts of the galaxies was one of the reasons I asked this question to start with, I must admit that giving it a try to capture dark nebulae without the need of narrow band filters is alluring. That I know I will never be able to do where I live.
My understanding is that narrow band filters do cut out most light pollution anyway; so, I wouldn't expect a huge difference using them (other than thanks to "cleaner" skies, of course).
Tim Hawkes avatar
I think that OIII might be the exception there. At least where I am the LED lighting throws out lots of light in that band but not so much up at SII and HA.
framoro avatar
Rho Ophiuchi region
Rostokko avatar
Rho Ophiuchi region

Pretty low on the horizon for me (never > 20° or so), but I will surely keep that in mind - it does look beautiful; thanks for the suggestion.
Well Written Respectful
framoro avatar
Rho Ophiuchi region

Pretty low on the horizon for me (never > 20° or so), but I will surely keep that in mind - it does look beautiful; thanks for the suggestion.

An alternative can be the squid and bat nebula in Cepheus...
Rostokko avatar
Rho Ophiuchi region

Pretty low on the horizon for me (never > 20° or so), but I will surely keep that in mind - it does look beautiful; thanks for the suggestion.

An alternative can be the squid and bat nebula in Cepheus...

LDN43 is indeed at the top of my list at this point.
Well Written
Byron Miller avatar
Rho Ophiuchi region

Pretty low on the horizon for me (never > 20° or so), but I will surely keep that in mind - it does look beautiful; thanks for the suggestion.

An alternative can be the squid and bat nebula in Cepheus...

I did that in B6 with an OSC and a triband, i second shooting broadband and chasing after some dark/reflection nebula
Jon Rista avatar
I would target IFN regions and dark nebula. If you are really going to be under ~22mag/sq" skies, best time to go as fast as you can (f-ratio wise) with broadband filters and get as much signal as possible in these faint, hard to capture structures. There should be plenty of both up in the sky right now, now that we are into summer.

It is also not a bad time to capture some nebula as well. There is a lot going in in most nebula regions, and often things that narrow band filters can't pick up. Faint white and blue reflection nebula all over the place is a big one. Narrow band images just don't really capture these reflections as they are usually from light off the narrow band emissions. Imaging this stuff under 22mag/sq" skies would be pretty fun. LOT of brighter emission nebula often have a lot of these reflection nebula scattered all about, but its pretty rare to see them. They are not that easy to capture, and harder to capture well enough, with strong enough signal, to really show them off, and they pretty much always need broadband filters or OSC. Hyperstar would make these rarer sights even easier to capture. Could be quite an eventful couple of nights!
Helpful Engaging Supportive
Rostokko avatar
…I wish I could spend a few weeks there!
Great suggestions; now I can only hope the weather cooperates…
Well Written Respectful