ES ED127 Users

8 replies254 views
Reg Pratt avatar
Looking for some feedback form anyone who does (or has used this scope). More specifically, those who use it with an APS-C sensor and field flattener. Which flatterer did you use? And how well did it correct field curvature? I'm in the market for a pair of 900-100mm refractors. In a perfect world of course I'd grab 2 TSA-120 but that's a bit out of my price range. It seems like the ED127 has a very good reputation I'd just like to hear some first hand experiences.
George C. Lutch avatar
I had the ES FCD100 ED127 OTA and really loved the images as well as the quality of the OTA.  I used the Hotech field flattener for the native focal length and the ES .7 Reducer\Flattener and these worked extremely well for me.
Patrice B avatar
Hi Reg,

i have an ed127 fcd1 (first price), which is a very good refractor achieving exceptionnal image quality for the price ($1500 in France)
At native focal length (952mm) the field is flat without corrector/flattener and so, for a aps/c asi2600mm cmos sensor.
i also use a 3 inches flattener/reducer ES 0.7 which is extremly well built and also really effective (perfect flat field). You should go and see pictures on my astrobin site taken with these setups.

Best regards and clear skies

Patrice Boyer, Cannes, France
Reg Pratt avatar
Patrice B:
Hi Reg,

i have an ed127 fcd1 (first price), which is a very good refractor achieving exceptionnal image quality for the price ($1500 in France)
At native focal length (952mm) the field is flat without corrector/flattener and so, for a aps/c asi2600mm cmos sensor.
i also use a 3 inches flattener/reducer ES 0.7 which is extremly well built and also really effective (perfect flat field). You should go and see pictures on my astrobin site taken with these setups.

Best regards and clear skies

Patrice Boyer, Cannes, France

Oh wow I had no idea it would be flat without a corrector with an APS-C sensor. Thanks for the info!
Patrice B avatar
Yes,
it’s not absolutely perfect but really usable even for good quality image
my ngc7635 widefield version is not cropped and also some others pic, it could givr you a good idea of the result expected.
Patrice B avatar
Sorry the ngc7635 is cropped, look at ic1396 which is nearly native aps/c (a few pixels cropped only for stacking)
Reg Pratt avatar
Patrice B:
Sorry the ngc7635 is cropped, look at ic1396 which is nearly native aps/c (a few pixels cropped only for stacking)

That's not too bad at all. I'd def get the flattener though if I do end up getting the scope.
Brian Meyerberg avatar
I have the ES127ed FCD-100 and I use the Starizona .65x reducer flattener with it. Here’s an image shot with the asi2600mc and not cropped much at all.

Rosette Nebula in SHO
Ahmed avatar
Hotech Flattener here, perfect stars on all corners. I also have ES .7 reducer and that also works just as well.

Good luck

Ahmed
Related discussions
TSA-120 and Full Frame sensor
Hello All, I've been looking at the TSA-120 a lot to use primarily for DSO imaging. As far as I can tell it will cover a full frame camera (using ASI6200MM) without some vignetting. Can anyone tell me what their experience has been or if there...
TSA-120 mentioned as reference scope; discusses sensor compatibility and flatteners.
Mar 12, 2023
Are Reducer/flattener "universal" for any refractor with the same focale length?
Hi all, I am on the point of buying a reducer/flattener for my 120ED refractor. My goal is to achieve F/D close to 5. I'd like to achieve a nice flattened image on an APS-C sized sensor. The reducer needs then to flatten the image correctly on a ...
Directly addresses reducer/flattener selection for refractors and field flattening performance.
Jun 29, 2023