I'm looking to buy a refractor to dedicate to solar imaging (becoming hooked).
I'm using the Quark Chromosphere with the ASI432mm mostly. I'm looking for something in the 90-130mm aperture range and according to my estimates, the ideal is going to be around F8.
I've seen a lot of doublets in use with Solar imaging and wondering if that is because they are more affordable/lighter or is it because the blue wavelength where they typically struggle isn't as important with Solar?
Is there any reason a carbon fiber tube will do better in a solar imager than an aluminum one? or vice versa? Focusing for solar is a struggle to get really accurate so I'd hate to get a new scope that was going to make me do that more often over a session.
appreciate all the insight!
CS
Nick
I'm using the Quark Chromosphere with the ASI432mm mostly. I'm looking for something in the 90-130mm aperture range and according to my estimates, the ideal is going to be around F8.
I've seen a lot of doublets in use with Solar imaging and wondering if that is because they are more affordable/lighter or is it because the blue wavelength where they typically struggle isn't as important with Solar?
Is there any reason a carbon fiber tube will do better in a solar imager than an aluminum one? or vice versa? Focusing for solar is a struggle to get really accurate so I'd hate to get a new scope that was going to make me do that more often over a session.
appreciate all the insight!
CS
Nick