hello everybody, so im just trying to get some opinions on this because im still thinking about what scope I should buy.
so I was planning on buying the WO pleiades 111 to use, because the f number seems so good on that ( and honestly I don't know many telescopes manufacturers). I will be using a qhy294M with Chroma filters (LRGBSHO) and im still thinking about later in the future to buy a Full frame mono camera( still deciding if from qhy or zwo) and everything paid up with the eagle. now In the future I want to do huge mosaics (that's why full frame later down the road), and in genera I like a more wider field than most people. now my question is, what would be better suited, the pleiades 111 or Takahashi? on paper i guess the Takahashi takes the place bc as I said I want to do mosaics and i can pair up the Takahashi with a reducer and get wider field with lower f. I want to know what your guys experience is with the Takahashi FSQ-85ED.
so I was planning on buying the WO pleiades 111 to use, because the f number seems so good on that ( and honestly I don't know many telescopes manufacturers). I will be using a qhy294M with Chroma filters (LRGBSHO) and im still thinking about later in the future to buy a Full frame mono camera( still deciding if from qhy or zwo) and everything paid up with the eagle. now In the future I want to do huge mosaics (that's why full frame later down the road), and in genera I like a more wider field than most people. now my question is, what would be better suited, the pleiades 111 or Takahashi? on paper i guess the Takahashi takes the place bc as I said I want to do mosaics and i can pair up the Takahashi with a reducer and get wider field with lower f. I want to know what your guys experience is with the Takahashi FSQ-85ED.
