Thanks for your reply, Rodney :-)
* About the blue cast: I think you are right :o The images were processed with GIMP. There was a background neutralisation during preprocessing which I think works well (see the
Ha/OIII only version, photometric color balance). But when after we added the RGB data into the mix we wanted to process is differently to get the current color temperature. I think we made the mistake of tampering with the temperature globally, and we only should have done so on the nebulous parts. Lesson learned

* The Ha/OIII data was taken during basically full Moon, right next to Orion... 30s @ISO 800 was as high as we could go without burning in too many pixels. (At this exposure only a handful of pixels were saturated.) With 120s @ISO 1600 we knew we would be saturating a considerable area (also, much more allowing filter) but we were hoping to capture more details (over 3 stops brighter exposure). So yes, idea was to capture higher dynamic range with the different exposure lengths; we were not trying to even out the different amount of brightness from the different filters (that would have required us doing the opposite, as our Ha/OIII filter is a lot more restrictive than the LP filter we used for the RGB). I like your idea of adding even more data, at shorter exposure; but that will need to wait until the winter, Orion is very low for us now
* The Canon 7DmkII we are using is a stock camera. We got it at a discount from eBay at 200k expos. Probably won't last forever, but it was a step up from the 400D for us
Again, thank you for your comments. Later I will RCC other images, I hope you will chime in
