What is the main difference between the Skywatcher EQ-5 Pro and the Skywatcher EQM-35 Pro?

6 replies366 views
AstroTimZ avatar
So I am quite new to this hobby and started to look for an equatorial mount, I came across the EQ-5 Pro and the EQM-35 Pro but I noticed that both have the same weight capacity and both have a goto controller.

This got me wondering, what mount is better, the EQ-5 Pro or the EQM-35 Pro?
Well Written Engaging
dkamen avatar
Hi,

The EQM35-Pro  is modular. You can remove the DEC component and have a lighter, RA-only mount similar to the Star Adventurer (and better suited to cameras with smaller lenses). This is the main difference.

Cheers,
Dimitris
Well Written Helpful Respectful Concise
AstroTimZ avatar
Hi,

The EQM35-Pro  is modular. You can remove the DEC component and have a lighter, RA-only mount similar to the Star Adventurer (and better suited to cameras with smaller lenses). This is the main difference.

Cheers,
Dimitris

Thanks for the response,

Which mount is better for a telescope in your opinion?
dkamen avatar
As to your other question, the EQM35 is a newer model and has a more precise tracking mechanism. BUT the EQ5 is larger and heavier. Combined with its monolithic (non-modular) design, it should be sturdier. Especially at the upper end of the payload capacity.
Well Written Concise
Johannes Bock avatar
I own a EQM35 and it is the mount which surprises me very often. The payload is the same to the EQ5 but you can set up the maximum load capacity to the EQM35 with no impact on the guiding acuracy. I love the EQM35 and use it for mobile astrophotography. Really good tracking with a real payload capacity of 10 kg.
AstroTimZ avatar
I own a EQM35 and it is the mount which surprises me very often. The payload is the same to the EQ5 but you can set up the maximum load capacity to the EQM35 with no impact on the guiding acuracy. I love the EQM35 and use it for mobile astrophotography. Really good tracking with a real payload capacity of 10 kg.

Hi, thanks for the support.

Do you think the EQM35 is able to carry a skywatcher 150PDS (4,9KG) with an DSLR and still track accurately?
Johannes Bock avatar
Yes, definately. Perhaps you have to adjust the worm drive first. But if there is an issue with the adjustment you can hear it. The adjustment is easy to perform.
Related discussions
Goto mount recommendations
Hi everyone, I've been using a Skywatcher alt az goto mount that I think is pretty much designed for visual astronomy. It was all I could afford when I bought it a few years ago and got the job done (exposure times of ~30s). It's tracking has...
Discusses goto mount selection criteria relevant to comparing two goto mounts.
Jun 26, 2022
Sky-Watcher EQM-35 Pro Not slewing
Hello this is my first post here and I'm hoping you folks can help. If this forum is not for equipment discussions I completely understand and please delete it. I bought my EQM-35 Pro brand new April of 21. I used it with no issues several times....
Directly addresses EQM-35 Pro mount issues; relevant to one mount being compared.
Oct 2, 2022
Mount upgrade recommendations? From HEQ5 Pro
I've had an HEQ5 Pro since I started this hobby and it has just about managed my 8" Skywatcher 200pds, filter wheel, camera, OAG, guiding cameras etc.. It does struggle with DEC backlash even though I've belt-modded it and tweaked it. I ...
Discusses mount upgrade decisions; relevant to evaluating mount options for astronomy.
Jun 2, 2022
Skywatcher EQ5 Pro or Ioptron CEM25P EQ? Plus telescope choice.
Hey everyone! I am currently looking at going for a proper Astrophotography setup as apposed to my little DSLR lens and Ioptron Skyguider Pro setup. First things first is the choice of mount. I am tossing up between a Skywatcher EQ5 Pro or the Ioptro...
Compares Skywatcher EQ-5 Pro with another model; directly relevant to mount choice.
Jul 5, 2019