Is it possible to image two different targets at once on the same mount?

5 replies299 views
Steve Ludwig avatar
Hi all,

My current setup is a 10" Newton on a EQ6-R mount which works perfectly well. Now, I'm wondering if it would be possible to attach my widefield setup (Samyang 135 + Nikon D3300) to the scope as well. So, instead of mounting only the guide scope onto the main scope, I could attach the Skywatcher L-bracket (that came with my Sky Adventurer) that could then in turn hold both the guidescope and the widefield setup. Even with that I would not exceed the 20 kg weight limit of the mount (but only by a few grams  smile ).

Assuming I had two cameras, could I (as an example) point the scope and the guidescope at the Orion Nebula, while my widefield setup images the heart & soul nebula region. Guiding should actually work for both objects and the Orion region should be the better target for the guidescope as it has a lower declination than the Cassiopeia region. So, one could image two targets in parallel like that.

Is it that easy or am I missing anything?

CS

Steve
Erlend Langsrud avatar
It is that easy.
Jeffbax Velocicaptor avatar
It is that easy as soon as you are very well in station on the pôle. If not, the field of the second target could rotate, specificly if you take long exposures. But with a few attention to this, no problem IMO.

Jf
Stefan Böckler avatar
Would the exposures on the two cameras be synchronized? Or would you dither on Orion while collecting light on the heart and soul? That might be a problem and you might have to dismiss some of your widefield frames.

CS
Stefan
David Redwine avatar
Synchronizing the dithers is not a problem if you use APT.  The biggest problem would be cone error which would cause field rotation.  I have a piggy-back set-up with an Apertura 60ED on top of an 8" Edge. The 60ED has about 20 arcmin more cone error than the Edge, and that is with both scopes polar aligned on premium quality rails (Primalucia)..  You can shim that out but it is a pain.

You would have to create a system that would move one scope relative to the other with the huge range you suggest.  Any small non-orthogonality between the the main pointing system and the offset mechanism could potentially cause several degrees of cone error.
dkamen avatar
The biggest problems I see are physical. Operating so close to your mount's weight limit. and aligning both targets accurately, especially the narrower one.

Usually people with 2+ cameras point them at the same object and image 2+ filters concurrently.
Related discussions
Trouble autoguiding (ST-4)
I am trying to autoguide with my EQM-35 mount. The camera is a ZWO asi178MC and the scope is a SVbony 60mm f4. The image camera is an Altair astro 294c and the scope is a Skywatcher 130 PDS. I'm not sure if I'm missing a step but I think I...
Autoguiding setup relevant to widefield astrophotography configuration.
Aug 5, 2022
Attaching DSLR to HEQ 5 pro GoTo
Hi everyone! I'm starting my first astrophotography setup and I'm going to start with a HEQ5 Pro GoTo mount. Since it is going to be a long time until I buy a matching telescope for it, I would like to know if there's any way I could dire...
Attaching DSLR to equatorial mount similar to author's scenario.
Mar 6, 2022
My experiences with MGEN3 guiding
I bought the MGEN3 for guiding with an Altair Astro 60mm guide scope on my Skywatcher 130mm and 20mm Newts. I had tried phd guiding but I had problems, probably because my laptop was old and underpowered. I also ran Cartes du Ciel and Sharpcap to con...
Guiding experiences with Newton reflector and guide scope setup.
May 5, 2022
EQ6-R vs CEM60 for an 8" Newtonian
Hi, so it's that time of year again, the nights are getting longer (in the Northern hemisphere anyway) and I am thinking about buying astro gear At the moment, I am using a 4" APO on an older NEQ6 - which works fine'ish, although I am ge...
Relevant - author planning parallel setup; directly addresses dual-target imaging on single mount.
Oct 17, 2019