Ocal Collimator used on TS-Optics Newtonian

Haakon RasmussenEmil AndronicJean-Baptisteandrea tasselli
34 replies1.5k views
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Here is the thing. I have collimated my Newtonian with the Ocal Collimator with various success. I have just found out that if i turn the collimator /camera) it goes of collimation immediately, if i turn it back, collimation is back. What is the problem? Is my focuser tilted, or the camera-sensor tilted, or is it something else? Help is very appreciated.

CS Haakon
andrea tasselli avatar
Usually is the focuser.
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Thanks  again, Andrea!
Brian Puhl avatar
Agreed.   Some focusers have tilt adjustment built into them….  personally I just shim the base in the direction I need.
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Thanks Brian!

Mine has a built in tilt adjustment. So i will get to work!

CS Haakon
Georg N. Nyman avatar
I have observed the same effect on my Lacerta Newton - collimation fine with OCAL and with Laser - rotate the devices - collimation off…. no tilt adjustment on focuser…. what a shame. I have to live with it I guess….

CS

Georg
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Hallo Georg,

you could shim the base, like Brian says above. I will do that on my telescope, because the adjustment screws does not really function.

CS Haakon
Emil Andronic avatar
I though I had a problem with the focuser too but I just tested the ocal and there's a massive tilt on the sensor.
Here's how it looks rotated at 180°
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Hallo Emil, 

do you mean the sensor of the Ocal camera?

CS Haakon
Emil Andronic avatar
Haakon Rasmussen:
Hallo Emil, 

do you mean the sensor of the Ocal camera?

CS Haakon



Yes, the ocal camera sensor.
I tested my farpoint laser collimator too and that's also out of collimation. No wonder I can't collimate my newtonian. 

Emil
andrea tasselli avatar
If you're testing it using the scope then you are not doing it right. You need an independent test (rig). Same applies to the Ocal. Conversely, if by other means the scope could be guranteed to be collimated it could be used to collimate the laser (not sure the Ocal can, though).
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Hallo Emil,

sensortilt would explain the problems i have getting good collimation using my IMX571 camera. My collimation was much better when i had the ASI294 McPro camera. Smaller sensor and bigger pixel. I do not have a test-rig, so i guess for me i would sell the Ocal and buy me an Autocollimator from Farpoint to be able to achieve better collimation. What do you think?

CS Haakon
Emil Andronic avatar
andrea tasselli:
If you're testing it using the scope then you are not doing it right. You need an independent test (rig). Same applies to the Ocal. Conversely, if by other means the scope could be guranteed to be collimated it could be used to collimate the laser (not sure the Ocal can, though).



I made a testing rig a while ago to test my laser and used it for the ocal too. I just attached a few M42 extension tubes to the camera so I can rotate it without changing its position. 

Emil
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Sounds good. Could you please provide a photo of this rig? I am not good at doing these things without seeing first. 

CS Haakon
Padraig Farrell avatar
Haakon Rasmussen:
Hallo Emil,

sensortilt would explain the problems i have getting good collimation using my IMX571 camera. My collimation was much better when i had the ASI294 McPro camera. Smaller sensor and bigger pixel. I do not have a test-rig, so i guess for me i would sell the Ocal and buy me an Autocollimator from Farpoint to be able to achieve better collimation. What do you think?

CS Haakon

It seems the Farpoint Autocollimator are hard to come by at the moment ?
andrea tasselli avatar
To test a laser collimator you would need either a lathe carefully set up, a flat mirror and a 10m baseline or a heavy V-block machined to very high accuracy (parallelism) and (at least) a 10m baseline. And a graduated target. That's the way I test my laser and the Farpoint one and the latter passed the test with flying marks. As for the Ocal what you have found is that isn't centered against the center of rotation of the rig you have used (as far as I understand from your post) but as far as the main Ocal function is concerned (centering the secondary) this isn't an issue.
Helpful Insightful Respectful
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Yes the Farpoint Autocollimator is sold out at the moment.
Well Written
Jens Leuteritz avatar
Just a hint from a beginner: Noctutec in Germany is one of the suppliers for the OCAL and on their website they mention that one shall not rotate the OCAL. I don't have one myself, I just read out. Reach out to Armin from noctutec, to find out why it should not be rotatet.

Clear skies! Jens
atlejq avatar
What type of focuser is mounted on your ONTC?
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
2" V-power from 2019. My telelscope is a UNC from TS.

CS Haakon
Jean-Baptiste avatar
Hello colleagues, hello @Haakon Rasmussen 

I am sorry but I don't fully agree with some statements here above, especially the statement that says that a newtonian colimation needs a tilt ajustment for the focuser :
- either the colimation is done with primary and secondary adjustments
- either a sensor tilt is managed with a tilt device at the camera level

I have a Lacerta also and it took me some time and some understanding of "what is colimation with a newtonian" to understand that tilt adjustement at the focuser is not necessary, I thanks Towny Nawratil, Vic Mesnard and Jason Khadder for the time they took via mail or PM to explain me that.

The Ocal is for me the most precise tool that you can get for a daytime colimation, but you must use it for what it can give you and you must understand what it gives you: it gives you a very precise geometrical reference that you will use for the alignment of others axis.

For me, it is very unlikely that the screenshot of @Emil Andronic comes from a sensor tilt, the most propable cause is that the Ocal is not properly calibrated 

It is like when you use a chesire : you need a reference for the axis of the focuser and the center of the sensor is not precise enough.

First : the Ocal comes with a serial number that need to be used for getting seetings that are when the software is launched, did you use the right values ?
Second: if you want to get a better tuning of the "ocal center" you can use insert a M42 tube end use this a reference for the calibration of the center of the OCAL with the "Center Offset" feature

in the screen shot here under, I found that with -4 Vertical and 3 Horizontal, the rings are properly and better  centered, you can see the internal thread of the M42 tube :


The OCAL is so accurate that you can see the differences that comes when you change something at the focuser level, the main reason for that is the accuracy of the "focuser axis", it is normal to see a difference after a rotation,
here after the difference that comes by changing the coma corrector with another :


the other reason is the flexion that you may have, here under is an animated GIF that shows a difference with and  without a weight of 2 kg added on the focuser :



My advice would be to first check that you have a good and valid reference for the "center" that you will use for the axis of the focuser

all the best and clear skies

Jean-Baptiste
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Thank you Jean-Baptiste. I will check again all my numbers. I always place the Ocal on my Coma Corrector with 55mm distance using the Wall of the Coma Corrector as reference for the center. I tried witout the CC and it got worse. Some say it is better to place the Ocal direkt on the CC without the 55mm. What do  you think? 

CS Haakon
Jean-Baptiste avatar
Hello Haakon

Personally, I think that the closer you are to your "astrophoto configuration" the better it is.
In addition, with the 55mm your sensor will be closer to the focal point.

In my case with  the coma corrector , the image is a little blury, so I may make the tuning without any CC ;-)

in all the case, the final steps is at night with stars : star test and if necessary final adjustment with Hocus FOcus that comes with NINA : the sensor analysis is a must for the last steps, be it colimation adjustments or tilt adjustments

CS
Jean-Baptiste
Haakon Rasmussen avatar
Do you use the camera for the Star testing? Like Tommy Nawratil? Or eyepiece?

CS Haakon
Jean-Baptiste avatar
The camera, all is in position, including the sensor for the acquisition
Related discussions
Need help
Hello . I have a problem with collimation or maybe backfocus but i dont think that is the problem . I forgot to keep an image of my defocused star but i Found something on Google to explain my problem . I use a quattro 200p . I did my collimation wit...
Collimation and backfocus issues with camera rotation affecting alignment.
Jan 6, 2025
Custom M54 tilt adapter to suit QHY CFW3M-SR & OAG-M system, fits within 55mm BF - Design Files Included!
Hello all. I have a QHY 294M-Pro, CFW3M-SR, and OAG-M fitted to my Vixen R200SS newt. I have been battling tilt with my 294M ever since I bought it, and have been stumped by the lack of suitable tilt adjusters available on the market (especially in M...
Discusses sensor tilt problems with camera systems on Newtonian telescopes.
Jan 1, 2025
Need advice for collimation of Skywatcher 200P
Hi, I've recently got a Skywatcher F4 200P reflector used but have some problems collimating it. I used ocal for collimation inside room, but after I take it out and put on the mount, I find stars are always not satisfying. I tried the next night...
Collimation problems with Newtonian reflector using similar collimation methods.
Jan 20, 2025
possible tilt problem Skywatcher 250PDS
Hi Guys! I hope you can help me with my problem on my Newtonian… Short explanation of my Equipment: - ZWO ASI 294MC Pro - Skywatcher Explorer 250PDS - Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro - ZWO ASI AIR - ZWO EAF I used this combo to photograph C27. The mount w...
Sensor tilt issue on Newtonian telescope with similar equipment setup.
Oct 24, 2024
Tilt
I have sensor tilt and trying to get rid of it. I am really unsure of how to physically adjust my camera (ASI2600MC) to fix it. The good news I think is tilt is right where the adjuster bolt is. I have taken 5 images of M44 and shared a picture of wh...
Directly addresses sensor tilt adjustment on camera systems.
Mar 16, 2025