Hello colleagues, hello
@Haakon Rasmussen I am sorry but I don't fully agree with some statements here above, especially the statement that says that a newtonian colimation needs a tilt ajustment for the focuser :
- either the colimation is done with primary and secondary adjustments
- either a sensor tilt is managed with a tilt device at the camera level
I have a Lacerta also and it took me some time and some understanding of "what is colimation with a newtonian" to understand that tilt adjustement at the focuser is not necessary, I thanks Towny Nawratil, Vic Mesnard and Jason Khadder for the time they took via mail or PM to explain me that.
The Ocal is for me the most precise tool that you can get for a daytime colimation, but you must use it for what it can give you and you must understand what it gives you: it gives you a very precise geometrical reference that you will use for the alignment of others axis.
For me, it is very unlikely that the screenshot of
@Emil Andronic comes from a sensor tilt, the most propable cause is that the
Ocal is not properly calibrated It is like when you use a chesire : you need a reference for the axis of the focuser and the center of the sensor is not precise enough.
First : the Ocal comes with a serial number that need to be used for getting seetings that are when the software is launched, did you use the right values ?
Second: if you want to get a better tuning of the "ocal center" you can use insert a M42 tube end use this a reference for the calibration of the center of the OCAL with the "Center Offset" feature
in the screen shot here under, I found that with -4 Vertical and 3 Horizontal, the rings are properly and better centered, you can see the internal thread of the M42 tube :

The OCAL is so accurate that you can see the differences that comes when you change something at the focuser level, the main reason for that is the accuracy of the "focuser axis", it is normal to see a difference after a rotation,
here after the difference that comes by changing the coma corrector with another :

the other reason is the flexion that you may have, here under is an animated GIF that shows a difference with and without a weight of 2 kg added on the focuser :

My advice would be to first check that you have a good and valid reference for the "center" that you will use for the axis of the focuser
all the best and clear skies
Jean-Baptiste