Jerry Gerber avatar
Hello!

Tonight I went outside with my AM5 mount and the ASIAIR Plus.  I got a very accurate polar alignment, both axis within 1 arc-minute.   But a few hours later after experiencing a lot of frustration with autoguiding (the seeing was far poorer than I expected and could not get sharp stars in my guidescope) I went back to check the PA and found that it had moved substantially, at least 8 or 9 arc-minutes.   How can this be?  I made certain that I locked snugly the RA and DEC lock levers on the mount, and I didn't bump into the tripod.  This can't be a result of very poor seeing, I don't think.

Any ideas of what caused this?  I hope my mount is not defective!

Thanks,
Jerry
Well written Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
I suspect it has to do with the Alt-Az either bolts with large tolerances or slacks when tightened down or you're sitting the mount in soft soil so that some creeping settling down occurs (this happens very often in water-logged conditions). BTW, if you're guiding with a guidescope around 200 mm FL you should NOT be able to see the effect of variable seeing. I certainly don't with even longer focal lengths.
Jerry Gerber avatar
andrea tasselli:
I suspect it has to do with the Alt-Az either bolts with large tolerances or slacks when tightened down or you're sitting the mount in soft soil so that some creeping settling down occurs (this happens very often in water-logged conditions). BTW, if you're guiding with a guidescope around 200 mm FL you's should be able to see the effect of variable seeing. I certainly don't with even longer focal lengths.

Me too.  The tripod was on a solid wood deck, no movement there, and I did not bump into the tripod or mount last night.  I think either the locking bolts are faulty or some other mechanical problem is happening.

Bummer, another hurdle to learning astrophotography,,,
andrea tasselli avatar
Jerry Gerber:
Me too.  The tripod was on a solid wood deck, no movement there, and I did not bump into the tripod or mount last night.  I think either the locking bolts are faulty or some other mechanical problem is happening.

Bummer, another hurdle to learning astrophotography,,,


Since the mount isn't balanced (I assume) there is a lot more scope for these things to happen than in traditional GEMs.
Jerry Gerber avatar
andrea tasselli:
Jerry Gerber:
Me too.  The tripod was on a solid wood deck, no movement there, and I did not bump into the tripod or mount last night.  I think either the locking bolts are faulty or some other mechanical problem is happening.

Bummer, another hurdle to learning astrophotography,,,


Since the mount isn't balanced (I assume) there is a lot more scope for these things to happen than in traditional GEMs.

Perhaps, but I have seen great images taken with this mount all over Astrobin.   I wonder if my particular mount is defective...
Well written
andrea tasselli avatar
Jerry Gerber:
Perhaps, but I have seen great images taken with this mount all over Astrobin.   I wonder if my particular mount is defective...


Maybe but the point is that the design itself doesn't lend itself to sloppy mechanics, the more so for inexperienced beginners, as I assume you are.  I do have a similar issue (sloppy Alt-Az adjustment bolts/gears) in my GEM28 but since it is well balanced it doesn't move around at all. It still requires a re-adjustment in PA every now and then but not over the course of few hours. Unbalanced variable loading would make this behavior much worse.
Jerry Gerber avatar
andrea tasselli:
Jerry Gerber:
Perhaps, but I have seen great images taken with this mount all over Astrobin.   I wonder if my particular mount is defective...


Maybe but the point is that the design itself doesn't lend itself to sloppy mechanics, the more so for inexperienced beginners, as I assume you are.  I do have a similar issue (sloppy Alt-Az adjustment bolts/gears) in my GEM28 but since it is well balanced it doesn't move around at all. It still requires a re-adjustment in PA every now and then but not over the course of few hours. Unbalanced variable loading would make this behavior much worse.

I am definitely inexperienced in astrophotography but not in visual astronomy!  I will contact ZWO and see what they have to say..

Thanks Andrea..
Andy Wray avatar
I've had nights like that where something moved in my setup and I never really quite worked out what what it was.  I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a problem with your mount.  Try again another night, be extra careful with how you set it up and polar align and you'll probably find it all works fine.  We all have nights like you have described.  FWIW:  I probably have that kind of frustrating night one out of every 5 nights when I have had to set up my kit from scratch.  Once it is working though, I try to leave it outside (weather-permitting) for as many days as I can without making changes to it and PA will then need no tweaking.
Helpful Supportive
Jerry Gerber avatar
Andy Wray:
I've had nights like that where something moved in my setup and I never really quite worked out what what it was.  I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a problem with your mount.  Try again another night, be extra careful with how you set it up and polar align and you'll probably find it all works fine.  We all have nights like you have described.

Well, I will try again when the seeing is better.  And you're probably right, maybe I did do something inadvertently that moved the polar alignment.    At least I got all my darks, bias frames, flat darks and flats complete!
Well written
Andy Wray avatar
Jerry Gerber:
Andy Wray:
I've had nights like that where something moved in my setup and I never really quite worked out what what it was.  I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a problem with your mount.  Try again another night, be extra careful with how you set it up and polar align and you'll probably find it all works fine.  We all have nights like you have described.

Well, I will try again when the seeing is better.  And you're probably right, maybe I did do something inadvertently that moved the polar alignment.    At least I got all my darks, bias frames, flat darks and flats complete!

I note that you mentioned taking darks, bias frames, flat darks and flats.  I would like to suggest that you drop the bias frames and just stick with darks, flats and flat darks.
Well written
Rick Veregin avatar
We have all had nights like this. I don't see how this could be a mount issue–unless the alt-az is not locking properly. This is purely mechanical, if you have everything locked down on your altitude and azimuth adjustments, and your tripod is properly locked, then there is nothing in the mount that would cause your polar alignment to drift. If you want, you could put a small piece of tape across where your alt and az rotate on the mount, if the tape gets pulled you know there was a shift there, so something wasn't properly tightened, or there is some issue preventing it to tightened properly. The dec/ra lock have nothing to do with polar alignment, unless they are not locked when you are actually doing alignment, but then your initial alignment would be poor.

One more point, make sure your tripod is really stable. The tripod needs to be properly tightened open so it can't move. And make sure the feet are well settled in place. A leg may get caught in a stressed position on setup and as the telescope slews that leg pops a few mm. I always take hold of the legs and give each a good shake after putting the feet down to make sure they are really in a stable spot. If your legs are 1 meter apart, then 10 arc-min is only 3 mm shift in the legs–if your legs move that little relative to each other it could explain the shift in alignment. Make sure your scope is balanced properly, if there is a lot of weight shifting around as the scope moves it can tilt you setup. I am not sure you can assume your deck is that stable, if you are standing on the deck next to your rig doing the polar alignment, then walk away, the deck can shift a few mm for sure. You can test this by doing polar alignment, then move to a different location on the deck and recheck, make sure as you walk around your alignment is not shifting. Also, with night cooling, contraction of wood can move things as well.
Helpful Engaging Supportive
Jerry Gerber avatar
Rick Veregin:
We have all had nights like this. I don't see how this could be a mount issue--unless the alt-az is not locking properly. This is purely mechanical, if you have everything locked down on your altitude and azimuth adjustments, and your tripod is properly locked, then there is nothing in the mount that would cause your polar alignment to drift. If you want, you could put a small piece of tape across where your alt and az rotate on the mount, if the tape gets pulled you know there was a shift there, so something wasn't properly tightened, or there is some issue preventing it to tightened properly. The dec/ra lock have nothing to do with polar alignment, unless they are not locked when you are actually doing alignment, but then your initial alignment would be poor.

One more point, make sure your tripod is really stable. The tripod needs to be properly tightened open so it can't move. And make sure the feet are well settled in place. A leg may get caught in a stressed position on setup and as the telescope slews that leg pops a few mm. I always take hold of the legs and give each a good shake after putting the feet down to make sure they are really in a stable spot. If your legs are 1 meter apart, then 10 arc-min is only 3 mm shift in the legs--if your legs move that little relative to each other it could explain the shift in alignment. Make sure your scope is balanced properly, if there is a lot of weight shifting around as the scope moves it can tilt you setup. I am not sure you can assume your deck is that stable, if you are standing on the deck next to your rig doing the polar alignment, then walk away, the deck can shift a few mm for sure. You can test this by doing polar alignment, then move to a different location on the deck and recheck, make sure as you walk around your alignment is not shifting. Also, with night cooling, contraction of wood can move things as well.

Great advice, thanks Rick.  I will make sure I pay attention to all the things you said.  Your last sentence in the first paragraph--In a strain-wave mount like the AM5, there are no RA-DEC locks, it's not even possible to move the telescope manually, it's all done electronically.  Manual slewing isn't possible.  But it was suggested to me that I do a PA, then partially lock the ALT_AZ locks and do it again, and then lock them down snugly.  If the deck is the culprit I'll really have to re-think this because it's the only spot in my yard where I can plate solve and polar align. 
Andy Wray:
Jerry Gerber:
Andy Wray:
I've had nights like that where something moved in my setup and I never really quite worked out what what it was.  I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a problem with your mount.  Try again another night, be extra careful with how you set it up and polar align and you'll probably find it all works fine.  We all have nights like you have described.

Well, I will try again when the seeing is better.  And you're probably right, maybe I did do something inadvertently that moved the polar alignment.    At least I got all my darks, bias frames, flat darks and flats complete!

I note that you mentioned taking darks, bias frames, flat darks and flats.  I would like to suggest that you drop the bias frames and just stick with darks, flats and flat darks.

Yeah, my OCD kicked in so I did both bias and dark flats.  I'll find out through experience when I finally get some lights which work best with my camera.  I've read so much controversy about which works best, and that it doesn't matter whether dark flats or bias frames are used that I do what seems most practical--experiment and go with personal experience!
Jerry Gerber avatar
Oops! 

In my original post I said that I had locked my "RA and DEC locks." 
​​​​
This is wrong, I meant to write ALT-AZ locks! 

The AM5 is a strain wave mount and has no RA or DEC locks.
Well written Helpful Respectful Concise
Roger Nichol avatar
8 or 9 arc min is hardly likely to affect your guiding stats or resulting image. The guiding should easily compensate for the RA and DEC errors that will result from that much PA error. I used to polar align my mount (EQ6-R) on each usage, but it is permanently outside so I now align it just a few times per year when I move the mount to mow the grass that has grown long around its tripod's legs.  I have checked PA before moving and found it typically out by 10 arc-min or so, presumably due to the ground swelling and contracting as it dries out or gets wet.  My guiding is as good before and after re-doing the PA, typically 0.4" to 0.7" depending on seeing and altitude. I tend to do long (1200s) exposures, so there is potential for image rotation during exposure if the PA is way out. I have not noticed any sign of such rotation.
Well written Helpful Insightful Engaging Supportive
Jerry Gerber avatar
Roger Nichol:
8 or 9 arc min is hardly likely to affect your guiding stats or resulting image. The guiding should easily compensate for the RA and DEC errors that will result from that much PA error. I used to polar align my mount (EQ6-R) on each usage, but it is permanently outside so I now align it just a few times per year when I move the mount to mow the grass that has grown long around its tripod's legs.  I have checked PA before moving and found it typically out by 10 arc-min or so, presumably due to the ground swelling and contracting as it dries out or gets wet.  My guiding is as good before and after re-doing the PA, typically 0.4" to 0.7" depending on seeing and altitude. I tend to do long (1200s) exposures, so there is potential for image rotation during exposure if the PA is way out. I have not noticed any sign of such rotation.

That's encouraging to know, thanks Roger.  Can't wait to get outside again, raining for the next several days in San Francisco so more patience required!
Well written Respectful
Related discussions
Star Adventurer not holding polar alignment
Hi all! After one year of flawless use, I'm starting to have trouble with my Star Adventurer. On two of my last four imaging sessions, it's not holding polar alignment. I don't know what could be causing this, I follow the same workflow e...
Directly addresses polar alignment drift issue with similar mount equipment.
Jul 10, 2024