Looking for 6" refractors, what are your recommendations?

4 replies184 views
Which scope?
Single choice poll 8 votes
13% (1 vote)
0% (0 votes)
25% (2 votes)
0% (0 votes)
13% (1 vote)
50% (4 votes)
You must be logged in to vote in this poll.
tsk1979 avatar
I recently sold my Edge HD 8" (after making some nice-ish, and most not so nice-ish) images with it. As a travel astrophotographer, with no backyard setup, I discovered that the Edge HD was a very demanding scope which required perfection. i.e. good seeing, little wind, collimation, guiding… the list goes on and on. 

I used my Explore Scientific 102 essential triplet quite a bit more than the Edge HD even with a smaller aperture. 

Now I have decided I will sell my ES102ED too, and these two sales mean I can look at the larger refractors. 

I have the following candidates, and would love to understand your opinions

1. Astrotech 130EDT - This is the astrobin darling. < 2000$ brand new. I can even use my F/7 compatible reducer(0.8x) from my ES102ED setup. So all in all, buying this would give me money to spare
2. Sharpstar 140PH - This is bigger and has 6.5 focal ratio which becomes 4.8 with the reducer. New costs about 4200$ with reducer. This is stretching my budget, but it seems to be an awesome scope hardly anybody buys…?
3. ES ED152CF - 6000$+ scope, but I can find used ones for 4000$ or below. This is F/8 which requires a 0.7X reducer making it a 5.6 scope. Reasonably fast I would say. 

Then there are the 127 triplets from ES, and the Orion 130mm triplet too. 

So wondering… which of these would you choose? The Astrotech EDT seems like an amazing value, but I do have some users complaining about CA on this tripet. The ES air spaced triplets are usually well likes. And as for Sharpstar, its popular in Germany as TS Optics I believe?

As a travel photographer who sets up and tears down, having a faster scope is better. I would have gone with a fast newtonian, but the collimation nightmares are something I don't want to deal with.
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging
Jeff Bennett avatar
The best refractors are:
1) Astro Physics 130
2) Televue 127is
3) Takahashi 130
Ive never imaged with a an AP, but if you could get one……I have imaged with both TV 127 is and a Tak 130.  The TV wins in my view because of ease of use when adding adapters, FR's, etc.  The glass in all three is far superior to any others out there.  All three are over $6k each.
Ruediger avatar
It depends on your budget since quality reflects in price. If money is not the limiting factor, you should consider a TEC 140 ED or FL. Optically at minimum the same level as a TAK, but for sure much better focuser. AP, TAK and TEC play in the same league. Only draw back of the TEC is the delivery time. 
The other options are good too (I owned also an ES102), but definitely another quality range - but cheaper. 


CS 
Ruediger
Helpful Concise
Arun H avatar
AP and TEC are probably the cream of the crop. Stellarvue seems very good on paper as well and I have direct experience with their 80mm triplet and a colleague with their 102 mm triplet with lower costs and more reasonable delivery times than AP, TEC or Tak.
Bob Fields avatar
I have an FSQ 106 and Stellarvue 152.  Both are equally matched in quality so depends on FL you want etc. And the budget really impacts the entire picture.  Currently have been doing most of the work with Stellarvue.
Related discussions
80mm choice
New to Astro Photography…. need to choose between a triplet Explore Scientific or Astro-Tech. Does either have an advantage?
Discusses 6" refractors; directly relevant to triplet refractor selection.
Jul 31, 2020
Large / Fast / Diffraction-spike-less telescopes for ultra narrow-band ... do they exist?
Hi, I live in a Bortle 7 (SQM 18.7) city and I have limited imaging time due to light pollution and limited open sky. I own a C8-A XLT with a HyperStar IV and a 0.63x SCT Corrector IV. The Hyperstar gives me 394mm focal length and the 0.63x reducers ...
Discusses demanding scope requirements; author seeking simpler alternatives.
Apr 28, 2024
Any idea why celestron's been making new telescopes, but no new equipment for those telescopes?
Hi guys, I've been in search of a .7x reducer for my Edge HD 8 for a while, and I noticed that celestron's been making and shipping new full scope packages, but ZERO new accessories like reducers, and T-adapters for them. Any clue whats going...
Author sold Edge HD 8; discusses similar scope experience and accessories.
Feb 23, 2021
I Haven't Yet Mastered Collimation with the Edge HD 8
Using the OCAL 3.0 Collimator is proving to be more difficult than I thought. I have tried collimating with and without reducer, with and without OAG and with and without the 21mm filter holder. I cannot seem to get the red circle to line up with the...
Directly addresses Edge HD collimation challenges author experienced.
Jun 1, 2024
Doubled bhatinov spikes.
An interesting thing happened last night. I got double bhatinov spikes on my edge hd 8. my backspacing was previously 104-ish, and everything was ok for the most part but i figured i would try to increase backspacing to the more reported 105ish. To d...
Edge HD specific issue; relevant to author's scope experience.
Mar 22, 2024