Hi all! I am very happy about the results of this tool. It has to be used carefully otherwise artifacts happen, but in my case, short exposures imaging (which gives very noisy results), it seems very useful. Are your opinion the same?
NoiseXTerminator
Thank you very much. I tried to find the specific topic but I couldn’t so I wrote this post.
Well Written Respectful
Interference-Style LP (Maybe even enhancement) filters, Fast Short Optics and the Problem with Long Period Variable Stars! Lesson Learned?
The following is something that I just posted with my last image, since it is relevant to the data generated and processed. I am partially reposting here, and changing where appropriate to those who may not see my image Rosette West Widefield - In OS...
Discusses data processing and artifacts relevant to tool usage concerns.
The need for REAL signal - Thoughts on true image quality
Having just been getting back into the astrophotography fray lately, after having been largely out of the game for a few years, I thought I'd start a discussion on the need for real signal. I kind of landed here, in 2024, right in the middle of t...
Addresses image quality and signal processing in astrophotography contexts.